porn star titnazi? :wtf

this was in salon today. just so much fail.

http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/madison_young_2/singleton/

if this porn star wants to be publicly sexual, fine; if she wants to be a moo, fine; but she can't call herself a M-I-L-F, be photographed looking slutty with a kid attached to her boob and then be indignant when she's accused of sexualizing breastfeeding. if she wasn't making it sexual why announce she would be breastfeeding live at an upcoming appearance? of course she knows that will attract a certain type of pedo crowd. she is using this as an excuse to get publicity and yet gets pissed when it isn't the right type.

ugh. just so gross and so hypocritical. :eyebrows

The only difference between this exhibitionist and a regular Moo public tit feeder is she gets paid by the pervs for providing them with illegal and disgusting live child porn. That's the only difference I see, other than perhaps one is admitting her sexual perversion while the other pretends it's all innocent.

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
If YOU are the "exception" to what I am saying, then why does my commentary bother you so much?
I don't hate your kids, I HATE YOU!

It's definitely hypocritical and I'd consider it a form of child pornography. The loaf doesn't have the capacity to consent to this act that moo is choosing to sexualize, so in effect she's forcing her kid to partake in public lewdness. I hope CPS burns this bitch with the heat of 1,000 suns. :cen

Her face screams "DURR" more than anything I've seen in recent memory.

Quote
WHAT???
At the show’s opening, she served up self-made breast milkshakes and displayed a baby quilt made of burp cloths and “porn star panties.

Please tell me I'm reading this wrong.

::brbl

No words can express the degree of disgust I currently feel after having read this.

It's against the law to use children for any form of sexual entertainment. She should go to jail, because this is outright sexual exploitation of a chyld....it is NOT about feeding or nourishing the loaf....although I rarely believe it is.

Sadly, there are some creeps who find the act titfeeding a turnon, and they get sexually aroused by the idea of a woman being erg...suckled. It's sick and disgusting, and in NO WAY acceptable. She knows this and plans to capitalize on it.

Porno-Moo is using her loaf to get her "audience" turned on, and get them off....in other words, she's using her chyld for kiddie-porn. I hope her pathetic ass lands in a jail cell.

She's definitely a pedo and sexually exploiting her kid. Lock her up.

Quote
raindancemaggie
::brbl

No words can express the degree of disgust I currently feel after having read this.

My thoughts exactly.

---

lab mom

There are only two big differences between this moo and any other pedo moo titnazi. Instead of pretending it's "best for baybee" she's putting this on display and being honest about it. If she didn't look better than the average moo, this would never have seen the light of day.
If CPS stepped in it would solve all problems.

What really bugs me is how many idiotic commenters think this bitch's "Becoming M*I*L*F" BS is just fine.
Just because she's a goddamned moo, she can use her chyld to sell herself sexually. Wow.
Don't they know what that stands for? Moos I'd love to F**K. What the hell do they think she's profiting from? Moo-hood? I don't think so! She's exploiting her chyld, and using it to capitalize on getting pervs off with her titfeeding.

IOW she's an incestuous pedo-moo.

Quote
At the show’s opening, she served up self-made breast milkshakes and displayed a baby quilt made of burp cloths and “porn star panties.

Doesn't breast milk smell bad?

"I'm a whore, but no, no, no, my tits are NOT sexy."

eyes2

I'm not even going to look after reading the comments here

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke