Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 683 |
Quote
H.R. 358, introduced by Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Pa.), goes beyond the issue of taxpayer dollars to place actual limits on the way a woman spends her own money. The bill would prevent a woman from buying a private insurance plan that includes abortion coverage through a state health care exchange, even though most insurance plans currently cover abortion.
Quote
An even more controversial aspect of the bill would allow hospitals that are morally opposed to abortion, such as Catholic institutions, to do nothing for a woman who requires an emergency abortion procedure to save her life.
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,320 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 1,979 |
Anonymous User
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,034 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 683 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,320 |
Quote
LoveToLurk
Glad to see the TP-run house is focusing on the important issues, like the fact that the unemployment rate is still on the rise.
Obama better veto this shit if it ever makes it to him.
Quote
KitsNotKids
But no doubt they will be breeding ignorant fuckwit sproggins to replace them. That said, I'll laugh my behind off if a Duggar turns out to be gay.
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 391 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 683 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 391 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 683 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 741 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 759 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 5,567 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 423 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 683 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 18 years ago Posts: 9,972 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 5,716 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 423 |
Quote
Cambion
I suppose were this to pass (and I doubt it would), the next thing to get outlawed would be women being allowed to purchase supplements or receive prescriptions that have abortifacent properties. Would it be like how no one can buy more than one bottle of Sudafed now because needing more than one bottle could mean somebody's making meth out of their basement?
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 18 years ago Posts: 9,972 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 423 |
Quote
Cambion
WaterLily suggested vitamin B6 to bring on a late period to me once. I think it was two 100 mg tablets a day and within about three days I was bleeding. I don't know if that was a coincidence or not, but it appeared to work on my period that was three weeks late.
From what I know about vitamin C, it halts the production of progesterone (which I think is what one of the pills given for medical abortion does). But I've also read that once you get all the vitamin C you need for the day, your body will flush out the excess. So I often wonder how vitamin C can be an abortifacent when all the extra vitamin content just leaves your body. I also wonder if it'd be more effective if it were inserted vaginally.
Anonymous User
Re: Protect Life Act October 14, 2011 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 15, 2011 | Registered: 18 years ago Posts: 9,972 |
Re: Protect Life Act October 15, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,921 |