Moo Holds Stillborn During Its Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 754 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 2,761 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,774 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 18 years ago Posts: 9,970 |
Anonymous User
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 361 |
Quote
Cambion
Love the comments...yeah, he's real beautiful and cute, being all dead and bruised and stiff. The very definition of beauty. Must be Moo didn't have the money to do any embalming because I know dead loaves can be embalmed just as much as dead adults. Either she was too broke or she wanted to have a natchural funeral in which people not only see a dead baby, but a dead rigor mortis baby that probably also smells.
Wonderful. Hopefully she didn't force anyone to hold it.
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 20, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 6,607 |
Quote
kidlesskim
http://www.cafemom.com/group/110162/forums/read/15402503/At_his_service
Jeez, and she included a picture too and the baby looks like a hideous little man. It's probably bruising or decomp on his face, but it looks like a beard.:smn
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 21, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 2,761 |
Anonymous User
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 21, 2011 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During Its Funeral November 21, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 4,998 |
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During Its Funeral November 21, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Quote
myrna minkoff
"I got to hold him throughout the whole service. That was the last time I held him. When I left I stood at the door and blew him a kiss."
ok, that wasn't for the dead kid, it was for her, so everyone could see it and she could milk this for even more attention. jeebus, these women seem to think their lives are a lifetime television movie.
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During Its Funeral November 21, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 5,275 |
Anonymous User
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During It's Funeral November 21, 2011 |
Quote
starlady
They gave it a whole name (first and middle) and had to buy a plot and a casket and invite the whole freeking fambly. I told my father that I was NOT going to something like that. Found out later that my cousin's whole freekin church was there... over 70 people.. in a cemetary at a funeral for a loaf that was shat dead.
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During Its Funeral November 21, 2011 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 741 |
Quote
kidlesskim
Quote
myrna minkoff
"I got to hold him throughout the whole service. That was the last time I held him. When I left I stood at the door and blew him a kiss."
ok, that wasn't for the dead kid, it was for her, so everyone could see it and she could milk this for even more attention. jeebus, these women seem to think their lives are a lifetime television movie.
It's like when they posts letters and comments to the deceased on facebooger and other sites. Our local paper runs a full page memorial thing around Valentines days and there are countless, "We miss you Emily and will see you again one day!!" and, "Mom and dad won't EVER forget our angel baby Horace, Born 2-2-08/died 2-2-08, RIP LITTLE ONE, Love, Mom, Dad,Justin, Sandy, Mike, and baby Grace,!" types of nonsense. Neither Emily NOR Horace will see those messages, so what's the point if not for attention? I can understand something along the lines of a simple, "In loving memory of Tyler", but these public "messages" to the dead are preposterous, IMHO.
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During Its Funeral November 22, 2011 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Quote
surfinbird
Quote
kidlesskim
Quote
myrna minkoff
"I got to hold him throughout the whole service. That was the last time I held him. When I left I stood at the door and blew him a kiss."
ok, that wasn't for the dead kid, it was for her, so everyone could see it and she could milk this for even more attention. jeebus, these women seem to think their lives are a lifetime television movie.
It's like when they posts letters and comments to the deceased on facebooger and other sites. Our local paper runs a full page memorial thing around Valentines days and there are countless, "We miss you Emily and will see you again one day!!" and, "Mom and dad won't EVER forget our angel baby Horace, Born 2-2-08/died 2-2-08, RIP LITTLE ONE, Love, Mom, Dad,Justin, Sandy, Mike, and baby Grace,!" types of nonsense. Neither Emily NOR Horace will see those messages, so what's the point if not for attention? I can understand something along the lines of a simple, "In loving memory of Tyler", but these public "messages" to the dead are preposterous, IMHO.
Exactly. It's not about the baby, the family or grieving, it's all about MOO.
I hate those fucking messages in the paper. It's so ridiculous. American death culture is ludicrous as it is, with us practically throwing concerts and poetry readings at people's funerals, but then to go every goddamn year and plaster pages and pages of "memoriams" in the newspaper is just stupid, IMHO.
I'm not saying that these people should just forget their beloved dead children, but the 5000 word, 250 line memoriam about what a beautiful baby Jayden Justice was is completely attention whoring. And it's not just for kids, I feel the same way when grieving family take out half page obits for adults, as well. There comes a time when the dead have to live in our hearts.
Re: Moo Holds Stillborn During Its Funeral November 22, 2011 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,033 |