Flight Attendant Fired After Telling Moo To Cover Udders

FFS!!!!

http://stuckattheairport.com/2012/06/14/flight-attendant-fired-for-breastfeeding-cover-up-comment/

Maybe they need to approach it differently and instead of TELLING the Fat Cunt to cover her udders, they could say, "I just thought you should know there have been numerous customer-passenger-patient complaints that your fully exposed teets are offensive. Some people don't want their CHILDREN to see your bloated and leaking udders either, but the choice to continue making your fellow passengers sick to their stomachs is yours alone. I am just the messenger and am not telling you to do anything".

------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
If YOU are the "exception" to what I am saying, then why does my commentary bother you so much?
I don't hate your kids, I HATE YOU!

KidlessKim, people like that woman, who was breast feeding, will complain no matter what. The "customer is always right" would be thrown at the flight attendant no matter what. Flight attendant was doomed no matter what.

Bow to The Almighty Maker of Magical Tit Nectar To Produce Future Generations of Flawless Superhumans.

Moo should have been told to cover it's udders. If she had put a blanket over itself I wouldn't be offended. Too bad another passenger didn't come out and call her a filthy pig. I know I would have.

OMG.

I hope that cow feel guilty. But probably not.

That udder feeder is a fucken cunt. If I saw her in public I wouldn't be afraid to tell her off. She's just acting like an entitled attention-whore by exposing her gross bodily fluids.

nd the FA did it because customers were complaining. If she did nothing, she would have gotten it from both barrels from other customers.

I officially give all pervs carte blanche to stare, point, drool and whack it under the blankets....after all, it is natural!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From a bottle cap message on a Magic Hat #9 beer: Condoms Prevent Minivans
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tranquilizers work only if you follow the advice on the bottle--keep away from children.

I would like to see some really negative splashback on Virgin for firing that flight attendant.
Anyone more savvy than me on how to get something going on the internet /other media?

Here is how to contact Virgin
http://www.virginamerica.com/contact-us.html

I agree completely with Peace.

Quote

If showing tits isn’t a problem, then I’ll just pull be boobs out of my shirt and sit there naked. Wanna bet that I’ll be told to cover up? And my breasts are perky and tiny, too!

if it’s not right for me to sit there bare-chested, then it’s not right for a nursing mother, either! you have no sense of modesty and appropriateness!

Either a boob is OK, or it isn't. I'd rather not see one at all, but I think a plain, non-leaking boob is way less gross than one trickling bodily fluids with a parasite attached to it *vomits*

I kind of think the same logic applies to public diaper changing. If it isn't OK for a grown man or woman to have their nether-regions in plain sight, it's not okay for a damn baybee, either. Genitals are genitals, no matter how old they are.

I feel bad for that poor flight attendant who was just doing her job. This attitude of "the customer is always right" has got to go! As a veteran of the service industry, I can tell you with absolute certainty that the customer is not always right. But of course when they're behaving badly and an employee tries (even tactfully and politely) to ask them to behave in a civil manner, the corporate bigwigs almost always cave and let them have their way at the expense of a poor employee who was only doing their job (in this case, responding to several other customers' complaints). I personally don't want to see titfeeding, either. There are so many ways to do it modestly, but these modern-day moocows want everyone to see their pendulous udders. I hear some older women who raised kids talk about how gross it is and how they'd be mortified to be seen with their tits hanging out in public and how they always found ways to cover up when they were titfeeding back in the day. But most people have lost the concept of shame and modesty.

I don't think she should have been fired. As she pointed out, her training as an FA didn't give any instructions as to how to handle a situation like this. Was she supposed to just ignore all of the other customers just to that moo wouldn't feel embarassed?

The comments are really getting me steamed up.....some of them are well thought out, while the babbling titfeeders are just going on about how everyone else should just back off and let moooo do her thing.

I am especially angry that this cost a woman her job. I suppose mooo's right to titfeed not only trumps other flyer's rights for personal comfort and safety, BUT it also trumps another person's right to be EMPLOYED??? GMAFB.

What about the duh getting all mad? What...? He likes it...probably gets all turned on knowing his wife's tit is hanging out for everyone else to see. I'm sure his little tiny boner went down when the flight attendant asked her to cover up...nobody else wanted to see "the show."

I hate titfeeders, and will do whatever it takes to make them feel unwelcome and uncomfortable in my presence. Whether I'm in a plane, train, bus or shopping mall. These women are molesting the law, just like they fucking molest their own kyds. Who knows? Maybe they were going to pull out a goddamned Rabbit vibrator on the plane and join the Mile-High club while they were all turned on by the exhibitionist suckling.

Quote
navi8orgirl
nd the FA did it because customers were complaining. If she did nothing, she would have gotten it from both barrels from other customers.

I officially give all pervs carte blanche to stare, point, drool and whack it under the blankets....after all, it is natural!

Here, here!! I wholeheartedly concur with this idea! Maybe then they would get the hint that their saggy, floppy tits are turning on some perv. Then again, they would probably love that!

No one would complain if the average titfeeder and her chest thumping spouse did not behave like primates in a zoo. But that is too much to ask.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From a bottle cap message on a Magic Hat #9 beer: Condoms Prevent Minivans
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tranquilizers work only if you follow the advice on the bottle--keep away from children.

What really steamed me about this whole thing is that there were other passengers that were made to feel uncomfortable and they voiced this to the attendant. The attendant, thinking of the majority, asked her to cover up (not STOP - just to cover) and she gets FIRED. Basically - fuck EVERYONE else and how they feel - one moo dictates and rules and woe to anyone who suggests otherwise.
Stabby!!!

Quote
Shiny
I agree completely with Peace.

Quote

If showing tits isn’t a problem, then I’ll just pull be boobs out of my shirt and sit there naked. Wanna bet that I’ll be told to cover up? And my breasts are perky and tiny, too!

if it’s not right for me to sit there bare-chested, then it’s not right for a nursing mother, either! you have no sense of modesty and appropriateness!

Either a boob is OK, or it isn't. I'd rather not see one at all, but I think a plain, non-leaking boob is way less gross than one trickling bodily fluids with a parasite attached to it *vomits*

I kind of think the same logic applies to public diaper changing. If it isn't OK for a grown man or woman to have their nether-regions in plain sight, it's not okay for a damn baybee, either. Genitals are genitals, no matter how old they are.

It turns out that some airlines have a no breast policy

No Jugs on SW

It turns out that some airlines have a no breast policy

No Jugs on SW[/quote]

Sorry to thread derail, but in what universe is the cleavage woman's outfit considered FASHIONABLE? That getup is truly appaling.

Quote
CatsPajamas
It turns out that some airlines have a no breast policy

No Jugs on SW
Sorry to thread derail, but in what universe is the cleavage woman's outfit considered FASHIONABLE? That getup is truly appaling.

ITA! I thought the same thing....Ugh. Who would wear such hideous garb? Why are they calling said hideous garb cute? Someone needs to call the Fashion Police!

This shit it waaaaaaaay out of control, to the point to where its costing someone their job enough is enough. Tit feeders should not get to run everything and force their ways on others. Nobody should have to be forced to put up with that shit. As far as i'm concerned breeders have too many fucking rights as it is. Who the fuck do they think they are to make people and businesses accept this kind of behavior. fuck them and their leaky ass udders they are not the center of the universe and its time more people told them so. Spoiled ass mother fuckers.

:

your children are overrated and overvalued, and
you've turned them into little cult objects. George Carlin

Not a single gram of fuck shall be given today

Quote
CatsPajamas
It turns out that some airlines have a no breast policy

No Jugs on SW

Sorry to thread derail, but in what universe is the cleavage woman's outfit considered FASHIONABLE? That getup is truly appaling.[/quote]

and certainly CHEAP looking. ugh. Hippies!!

Quote
CatsPajamas
It turns out that some airlines have a no breast policy

No Jugs on SW

Sorry to thread derail, but in what universe is the cleavage woman's outfit considered FASHIONABLE? That getup is truly appaling.[/quote]

Dawg the Bounty Hunter's world. We sure that isn't his wife?

_______________________________________________
"I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery

It is a hideous outfit, by most standards. Point being, however, is that this level of breast is not ok. I think that tit-feeding shows a lot more.

That outfit is tacky and clearly done for attention. Southwest is known for kicking people off for being inapproriately dressed. While I am not an SWA fan, I agree with them here.

Jezebel is wrong (Kyla Ebbert was going commando in a skirt that was clearly too short...a passenger mentioned getting a cooter shot when she was putting stuff into the OH bin. On TV, she was clearly pulling it down though she flashed her panties when she sat.)

But the original thought...a tit is a tit regardless of whether there is a kid attached. Either they are okay bared or they are not. Period.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From a bottle cap message on a Magic Hat #9 beer: Condoms Prevent Minivans
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tranquilizers work only if you follow the advice on the bottle--keep away from children.

Quote
navi8orgirl
Jezebel is wrong...

I can't disagree with you there. While I read Jezebel mostly for the snarky political comments, it is pretty breeder-friendly.

Quote
navi8orgirl
But the original thought...a tit is a tit regardless of whether there is a kid attached. Either they are okay bared or they are not. Period.

This was the point I tried to in-eloquently make, and failed... Hell, I don't even care if someone HAS to feed their brat on a plane to keep it quiet, but would it KILL you to use a pashmina?

(We already know the answer to this - yes, it ruins their chance to gross us all out.)