Pro-liars get their way in Indiana
Posted by Techie
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana March 31, 2015 |
Quote
Techie
I did not expect this out of Indiana.
No? Are you being sarcastic? IN is pretty backward.
I'm happy that people are throwing shit fits over IN's new 'religious freedom' law. I especially liked this ~
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/30/rahm-emanuel-indiana-religious-freedom-restoration-act_n_6973806.html
Rahm Emanuel jumps in to try to lure biz's to Chi. Ha. He's such a sleazy guy
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana March 31, 2015 |
Quote
Zzelda
Quote
Techie
I did not expect this out of Indiana.
No? Are you being sarcastic? IN is pretty backward.
I'm happy that people are throwing shit fits over IN's new 'religious freedom' law. I especially liked this ~
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/30/rahm-emanuel-indiana-religious-freedom-restoration-act_n_6973806.html
Rahm Emanuel jumps in to try to lure biz's to Chi. Ha. He's such a sleazy guy
It's making other states pause on their own measures
GA and NC say "oops, maybe this ain't such a good idea after all."
I saw a headline where NC Republican Governor McRory declared elements of his state's version of such a bill "make no sense."
Smart fellow. McRory is aligned more strongly with business than religion. He's already seeing the dollar sign impact being wrought on Indiana. NC is slowly recovering from the economic crash, having been a state that attracted a lot of business from the '80s through the early part of 2000s. He wants to revive the state's attractiveness to business transplants.
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana March 31, 2015 |
Quote
Dorisan
Quote
Zzelda
Quote
Techie
I did not expect this out of Indiana.
No? Are you being sarcastic? IN is pretty backward.
I'm happy that people are throwing shit fits over IN's new 'religious freedom' law. I especially liked this ~
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/30/rahm-emanuel-indiana-religious-freedom-restoration-act_n_6973806.html
Rahm Emanuel jumps in to try to lure biz's to Chi. Ha. He's such a sleazy guy
It's making other states pause on their own measures
GA and NC say "oops, maybe this ain't such a good idea after all."
I saw a headline where NC Republican Governor McRory declared elements of his state's version of such a bill "make no sense."
Smart fellow. McRory is aligned more strongly with business than religion. He's already seeing the dollar sign impact being wrought on Indiana. NC is slowly recovering from the economic crash, having been a state that attracted a lot of business from the '80s through the early part of 2000s. He wants to revive the state's attractiveness to business transplants.
This is the first time I ever agreed with him on anything. Meanwhile, Mike Pence is doubling down and going full retard on his shiny new discrimination law. We'll see how dedicated he is to it when thousands of people are crying for his blood over Indiana's newly-denied business opportunities...
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana March 31, 2015 |
Quote
Dorisan
Quote
Zzelda
Quote
Techie
I did not expect this out of Indiana.
No? Are you being sarcastic? IN is pretty backward.
I'm happy that people are throwing shit fits over IN's new 'religious freedom' law. I especially liked this ~
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/30/rahm-emanuel-indiana-religious-freedom-restoration-act_n_6973806.html
Rahm Emanuel jumps in to try to lure biz's to Chi. Ha. He's such a sleazy guy
It's making other states pause on their own measures
GA and NC say "oops, maybe this ain't such a good idea after all."
I saw a headline where NC Republican Governor McRory declared elements of his state's version of such a bill "make no sense."
Smart fellow. McRory is aligned more strongly with business than religion. He's already seeing the dollar sign impact being wrought on Indiana. NC is slowly recovering from the economic crash, having been a state that attracted a lot of business from the '80s through the early part of 2000s. He wants to revive the state's attractiveness to business transplants.
If NC and GA pass any similar bills, they can say goodbye to all that film industry money.
------------------------------------------------------------
"Why children take so long to grow? They eat and drink like pig and give nothing back. Must find way to accelerate process..."
- Dr. Yi Suchong, Bioshock
"Society does not need more children; but it does need more loved children. Quite literally, we cannot afford unloved children - but we pay heavily for them every day. There should not be the slightest communal concern when a woman elects to destroy the life of her thousandth-of-an-ounce embryo. But all society should rise up in alarm when it hears that a baby that is not wanted is about to be born."
- Garrett Hardin
"I feel like there's a message involved here somehow, but then I couldn't stop laughing at all the plotholes, like the part when North Korea has food."
- Youtube commentor referring to a North Korean cartoon.
"Reality is a bitch when it slowly crawls out of your vagina and shits in your lap."
- Reddit comment
"Bitch wants a baby, so we're gonna fuck now. #bareback"
- Cambion
Oh whatever. Abortion doctors are crimestoppers."
- Miss Hannigan
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana April 01, 2015 |
Quote
Dorisan
Proof being that helmet hair harpy politician Sylvia Allen thinks that church attendance should be mandatory
Though she hasn't proposed a bill that would mandate such action, she does provide an "out" for us regenerates, I guess. According to this woman, who abides by the belief that the earth is only 6000 years old, people would be allowed to attend a "church of their choice."
Well, cool. That opens so many possibilities. Aside from the well-known worship of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, we childfrees could form our own worship. Those of us who are devoted to our pets could have our own church.
I bow to his holy meatballs! I shall rejoice as his noodles becomes the Messiah to the masses!
+++++++++++++
Passive Aggressive
Master Of Anti-brat
Excuses!
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana April 01, 2015 |
Didn't America go into Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban and liberate women, yet US states are continually restricting women's access to abortion? Talk about ironic. 
eyes2
eyes2|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana April 01, 2015 |
Quote
popcornculturejunkie
Quote
Peace
Quote
bershaw
Indiana's Religous Freedom Law is appalling.
Sentencing Purvi Patel to prison is justice. She attempted to abort her 6 possibly 7 month fetus using abortion drugs she bought online. Why? No place could legally peform an abortion for her at that point. That's not an Indiana thing.. for an elective abortion NO state would have performed one at that point.
Google the court documents.
You're a fucking moron. Why would you register on a childfree site just to troll? Don't you have a fetus to gestate, or a kid to take care of?
Go away, before we out you.
I second this statement...GTFO now, or get ready to be fucking barbecued.
mob+++++++++++++
Passive Aggressive
Master Of Anti-brat
Excuses!
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana April 01, 2015 |
Quote
bershaw
Indiana's Religous Freedom Law is appalling.
Sentencing Purvi Patel to prison is justice. She attempted to abort her 6 possibly 7 month fetus using abortion drugs she bought online. Why? No place could legally peform an abortion for her at that point. That's not an Indiana thing.. for an elective abortion NO state would have performed one at that point.
Google the court documents.
Oh, go fuck yourself blindfolded in a minefield, you weapons-grade thundercunt.
--------------
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who haven't got it."
George Bernard Shaw
"An oyster can play catch if u only give it the oprotunity"
Some random YouTube commenter
"hate comments will be deleted!! fuckers!"
Some random YouTube uploader
|
Re: Pro-liars get their way in Indiana May 01, 2015 |
The fact that the term "feticide" not only exists, but is apparently considered a crime makes me stabby. The suffix "-cide" usually indicates murder, and murder indicates a living, sentient, BORN person/creature. Infanticide, matricide, genocide, suicide, homicide, paricide, sororicide, etc. Notice how all those involve people who are already born. Feticide seems out of place. I'm of the mindset that, until it's officially born (not miscarried, but born born), it's a fetus and the woman can do what the fuck ever she wants with it. Clumpley can earn rights by coming out alive and staying that way for a while like the rest of us had to do.
The real crime here is that, due to cultural pressure and probably a lack of information, this woman had to do something dangerous to remove an unwanted fetus from her body. This is a developed nation and no woman should have to endanger her health like this. Yet she's treated as a criminal for forcing a clump out that was a few weeks past the legal elective abortion expiration date.
Yup, agreed. I'd get that fetus out of me one way or another if a doctor refused to. I figure if I wound up with something too large to be flushed, I'd burn the evidence out in the fire pit (one upside to country living is no one gives a fuck if you burn trash), chop/crush anything that didn't burn and either bury it or throw it in the river. Good luck putting all those puzzle pieces back together, pro-liars!
I understand that right after sluicing/miscarrying and proceeding to bleed out, a woman's head won't be all that clear, even if she's got a plan all laid out. The abortion slope becomes slippery legally once a fetus is close to or beyond 20 weeks, so it's good to have something resembling an idea of how to dispose of the remains should the woman have a successful home abortion past five months.
Soooo, they just think she used abortion pills and are charging her on this assumption when there was no evidence of the drugs in her system? That sounds totally fair.
r Pills for inducing abortion are only used during the first two months of pregnancy because the risk of using them after that is higher and/or the pills might just not fucking do anything at all. If a clump is too developed, abortion pills might just jump-start labor.
This is a pretty bleak case. Any woman could go to the ER for a miscarriage (induced or otherwise) or just plain heavy bleeding from endo/PCOS/fibroids and leave in handcuffs because someone feels that a fetus or potential fetus has rights. I also wonder if this lady would have faced legal repercussions had she been Caucasian. I don't know how racially diverse Indiana is, but I have a feeling that race may have played a role in this woman's sentence.
The real crime here is that, due to cultural pressure and probably a lack of information, this woman had to do something dangerous to remove an unwanted fetus from her body. This is a developed nation and no woman should have to endanger her health like this. Yet she's treated as a criminal for forcing a clump out that was a few weeks past the legal elective abortion expiration date.
Quote
Peace
I had often thought that if I became knocked up, I'd abort. If I couldn't get a legal abortion, I'd do a home-made one, take the expelled fetus into the woods and bury it. The Pinelands is a big region. Go there at sundown with a small shovel, dig a hole, and stick the dead fetus into the ground and cover it up. Go home, wash out the plastic bag the fetus was in, cut it into small pieces, bleach it, and throw the pieces into the trash. Done.
Yup, agreed. I'd get that fetus out of me one way or another if a doctor refused to. I figure if I wound up with something too large to be flushed, I'd burn the evidence out in the fire pit (one upside to country living is no one gives a fuck if you burn trash), chop/crush anything that didn't burn and either bury it or throw it in the river. Good luck putting all those puzzle pieces back together, pro-liars!
I understand that right after sluicing/miscarrying and proceeding to bleed out, a woman's head won't be all that clear, even if she's got a plan all laid out. The abortion slope becomes slippery legally once a fetus is close to or beyond 20 weeks, so it's good to have something resembling an idea of how to dispose of the remains should the woman have a successful home abortion past five months.
Quote
Article
Despite Patel's claim that she gave birth to a stillborn child, prosecutors argued that Patel gave birth to a live fetus and charged her with child neglect. Prosecutors also claimed that Patel ordered abortion-inducing drugs online and tried to terminate her pregnancy, but a toxicology report failed to find evidence of any drugs in her system.
Soooo, they just think she used abortion pills and are charging her on this assumption when there was no evidence of the drugs in her system? That sounds totally fair.
r Pills for inducing abortion are only used during the first two months of pregnancy because the risk of using them after that is higher and/or the pills might just not fucking do anything at all. If a clump is too developed, abortion pills might just jump-start labor.This is a pretty bleak case. Any woman could go to the ER for a miscarriage (induced or otherwise) or just plain heavy bleeding from endo/PCOS/fibroids and leave in handcuffs because someone feels that a fetus or potential fetus has rights. I also wonder if this lady would have faced legal repercussions had she been Caucasian. I don't know how racially diverse Indiana is, but I have a feeling that race may have played a role in this woman's sentence.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.