Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. March 31, 2016 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 4,998 |
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 01, 2016 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 172 |
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 01, 2016 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 5,632 |
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 01, 2016 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,304 |
Quote
randomcfchick
I read Watership Down when I was 12. I enjoyed it. My parents didn't really censor what I read, and I discussed the book with my mom a bit as I went.
I never saw the movie, but I am a total grouch about movies made from books because I've already cast and filmed it in my head while reading it, so of course any directors will get it "wrong". And don't get me started about cutting out sections and adding unnecessary material, either.
Every few years, it seems, Moms remember that Watership Down contains rabbits and therefore must be sanitized for kids. The internet explodes about it for a bit, then calms down for a while.
And a lot of moms DO seem to think that certain subjects are just naturally "kid topics" and no adult-only movies/novels/comics/art should be made about them, because kids will want to look at that movie/novel/comic/art. It's weird...it's not like the moms object to monitoring what their kid watches/reads...it's more like they just think that certain entire topics are kid-only. "If it has bunnies, it should be for kids and I shouldn't have to worry about it!" The world doesn't work that way, moms.
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 03, 2016 | Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 198 |
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 03, 2016 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 172 |
I'm so glad Beagle had control of the script so the film stayed very accurate to his book even with the compression of the story's events so the movie doesn't run too long, which could make the targeted audience, families, begin to lose interest watching.Quote
the noodler
The Last Unicorn was also adapted very well from Beagle's book.
Oh! I remember that site! I think the last time I browsed it out of curiosity was 2005 or 2006. I have no idea what the site was called.Quote
tea princess
There was actually a website where parents could check if the movie their kids want to see is recommended for kids of a certain age or not. (So that they won't have to watch it themselves.) Since the site was written by the readers, it was completely useless when you wanted to find out how much violence occurs in a movie -- when parents think of "not recommended for kids", they immediately think of The Evil Sex, and never of anything else. The first Terminator movie was not recommended because of the brief, not really explicit sex scene of Sarah and Kyle. Titanic was not recommended because of Kate Winslet's breasts. (Let's forget that over a thousand people died on that ship.)
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 04, 2016 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 5,632 |
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 05, 2016 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 3,576 |
Quote
randomcfchick
Hell, IMDB contains a thingy on each movie's individual page about whether it's suitable for children, listing off individual potentially-offensive events and themes, similar to what tea princess listed about Titanic. It's reeeeeeally easy to find out info like this nowadays. Or just stream the movie yourself and skim through it. Moms don't want to bother, and they feel that certain themes "belong" to children and should not be made into adult movies.
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 27, 2016 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 6,607 |
Quote
Netflix and the BBC are teaming up to ensure that no generation of children goes without the character-building experience of waking up screaming at the thought of being messily devoured by rabbits, or drowned in pastoral fields of blood.
Re: Watership Down on at Easter. Moos lose it. April 27, 2016 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 216 |