Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status

Posted by bell_flower 
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
October 02, 2017
Another day in America, another mass shooting. I was listening to the news this morning. The latest attack in Las Vegas happened about 6 hours ago. 50+ known to be dead and another 200 injured. I have been flipping back and forth between news stations. One of the bobble heads on Faux was actually asking these so-called "experts" whether any childruuuuun were there.

First of all, even though it happened at 10 p.m. on a Sunday (school) night, you know some irresponsible Breeder brought his/her kids to this event.

One of the bobble heads said, with an air of relief, that there didn't appear to be any children there when this happened.

I said to DH, well, isn't that happy news? Only 50+ adults dead.

Mark my words, if there are children or pregna-saurs or parunts among the wounded or dead, they will be front and center in our media.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
October 02, 2017
Quote
bell_flower
Mark my words, if there are children or pregna-saurs or parunts among the wounded or dead, they will be front and center in our media.

And the parental status of the attacker won't be in any headlines unless they can use "loner".
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
October 03, 2017
Apparently CBS canned a lawyer and senior VP who wrote on FB that she had "no sympathy" for the victims because country music fans are usually republicans and noted that they "didn't do anything when children were murdered**,." so she doesn't feel sympathy for them now.

**A reference to Sandy hook.

Hey, I'll be the first to admit gun policy in the U.S. is forked up, but she deserves to be fired because she's stupid. (And note to lurking Breeders, this is a rant page, but we draw the line at condoning violence.) She should feel equal compassion for all victims because adults or not, they were all innocent bystanders.

The daily fail captured pictures from her social media, where she proudly calls herself a mommy and displays her three crotch critters.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942160/CBS-lawyer-fired-saying-no-sympathy-Vegas.html

I thought being a Moo made you compassionate and wise?

ETA: And note the headline identifies her as a "Top CBS Lawyer," no mention of parental status of course, because she stuck her foot in it.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
October 03, 2017
Well, I am getting sick of references to Sandy Hook, as if children dying were somehow worse than adults dying. It isn't. People can't be slotted into a simple value equation of 1 year old > 10 year old > 20 year old > 30 year old > 40 year old ...

But most of the world is breeders, and most of the world thinks it is somehow worse when children die. (You sort of wonder why they created them, then, because we'll all die, someday. It's the inevitable result of living.)
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
October 04, 2017
Quote
yurble
Well, I am getting sick of references to Sandy Hook, as if children dying were somehow worse than adults dying. It isn't. People can't be slotted into a simple value equation of 1 year old > 10 year old > 20 year old > 30 year old > 40 year old ...

But most of the world is breeders, and most of the world thinks it is somehow worse when children die. (You sort of wonder why they created them, then, because we'll all die, someday. It's the inevitable result of living.)

Why they created them? To ponder that requires two braincells to rub together. Moos don't have that.

+++++++++++++

Passive Aggressive
Master Of Anti-brat
Excuses!
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
October 09, 2017
There was some nastiness toward Jason Aldean, they guy who was performing at the Route 91 Harvest festival. He ran off the stage when the bullets started. A few Twatter dipshits posted that he was a coward and he didn't 'warn people" before running off the stage. First of all I don't fault anyone for anything they do in a life-or-death situation, when they have seconds to react. The natural instinct is to run and I don't blame anyone for saving his/her own life. And even if he said, "hey, everyone get out of here" it would have caused more even more chaos because there wasn't a lot of room for people to exit and maybe more people would have been trampled.

Of course none of his defenders made logical statements. 99% of his defenders grasped the single-line-of-though, mouth--breathing standby

"I don't blame him for running--he has two kyds and another one on the way. "
"He has a fambilee to protect."

So I guess it's okay if people without kids are expendable in a situation like this?

Most of these idiots who started this deleted their tweets, but it was there.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
October 29, 2017
More evidence of treating Holy Moos with kid gloves.

Okay so about a year ago a Moo in Idaho packed her three kids in the car and drove them over a cliff in her pricey LandRover SUV.

It's been a year and authorities spent a lot of time and money before they finally concluded it was a deliberate act. (They even involved LandRover in the investigation to see if it was a "mechanical failure," even though witnesses reported she turned the car toward the cliff and sped toward it.) Note the tone of the article. Not once is the word "murder" mentioned, only that it was a "deliberate act." It doesn't even read that SHE killed them, only that it was a "family tragedy." There is a mention that other women have done this, but they were mentally ill and psychologically depressed. They even have the gall to mention Susan Smith, who was spared the death penalty due to trauma she experienced as a chhyyyyld. (Conveniently failing to mention that Susan Smith had a boyfriend who wanted her kids gone prior to her offing them and making up a story about them being kidnapped. )

Why can't we call these murderous acts what they are? The article does a lot of hand-wringing and asks why this happened. It does mention that she went through a divorce two years ago. It seems pretty plain to me that this was probably an act of vengeance. Killing yourself is one thing, but deciding to kill your kids seems like the ultimate Fuck You to the dud. She could have offed herself and let the kids be raised by the Dud, but then he would have "won."

Duds who kill their kids get a lot less leeway. Check out this article from June 2017, where a Dud killed his two kids and then himself on Father's Day. Although the headline does omit the word "father" and refers to him as a "California man," the article doesn't shy away from saying he killed them and it mentions a custody dispute and calls the act "murder suicide." and the kids are barely cold. Yet in the other scenario, a year goes by with all these alternate theories (that cost taxpayers a lot of money) and STILL they don't use the word murder.

Women are human. Some humans are murderers. Some humans are shitty parents. Some humans commit vengeful acts. But don't count on the media to not sugar-coat bad Moo behavior.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
November 06, 2017
Texass church shooting and here's a headline:

Relative: Pregnant woman, 3 children, in-laws slain in Texas

Just following the hierarchy: pregnant women are the most important people on Earth, followed by children, and the adults only get a mention of how they are related to the pregnant woman.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
November 06, 2017
The pregnant woman is worthless. Her UTERUS is what is important to the breeder readers.

+++++++++++++

Passive Aggressive
Master Of Anti-brat
Excuses!
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
January 03, 2018
I can't believe it is happening already. My home page on the computer is MSN and today on the news: A mom has twins 2 years after she had another set of twins. A Boston cop delivers a baby. Chip and Joanna Gaines are pregnant with a 5th kid (guess to show off his dick werks?), and just before New Years, a woman delivers a baby in a butcher shop and the butcher catches it. One good bit of good news: The first baby of the year didn't come until well after 3 am. I guess women don't like to have babies in hospitals anymore.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login