Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status

Posted by bell_flower 
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
June 01, 2020
From the article:

Quote

Contrary to the conventional thinking that a major natural disaster would inspire Americans — suddenly sensing their own mortality — to grow their families, history tells us that the opposite is more likely.
According to Lyman Stone, a research fellow at the Institute for Family Studies, “events that cause a large increase in deaths tend to cause a large decrease in births nine months later.”
He cites natural disasters such as hurricanes and famines, as well as previous pandemics. Would-be parents may be traumatized by fear or concerned about how they would care for children during difficult and uncertain times.

Quote

The U.S. fertility rate still hasn’t fully recovered after the financial crisis of 2008. With millions of couples citing economic reasons for delaying pregnancy, there is good reason to believe that the post-corona birth rate will not follow the pattern of past pandemics.

You mean people are actually looking at the type of world this is before they bring kids into it? This is a reason for celebration, not hand-wringing.

As much as this would be good news, I am skeptical. There are PLENTY of morons who look at the world and say it's my right to have a baybee because I WANNA.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
June 01, 2020
Quote
bell_flower
From the article:

Quote

Contrary to the conventional thinking that a major natural disaster would inspire Americans — suddenly sensing their own mortality — to grow their families, history tells us that the opposite is more likely.
According to Lyman Stone, a research fellow at the Institute for Family Studies, “events that cause a large increase in deaths tend to cause a large decrease in births nine months later.”
He cites natural disasters such as hurricanes and famines, as well as previous pandemics. Would-be parents may be traumatized by fear or concerned about how they would care for children during difficult and uncertain times.

Quote

The U.S. fertility rate still hasn’t fully recovered after the financial crisis of 2008. With millions of couples citing economic reasons for delaying pregnancy, there is good reason to believe that the post-corona birth rate will not follow the pattern of past pandemics.

If the post-corona birth rate does not follow the pattern of past pandemics, and the pattern of previous pandemics is to decrease births, is the author suggesting that covid will result in more babies? Or is their brain too rattled with baby rabies to construct a consistent argument? drooling stupification
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
June 02, 2020
Unlike most other disasters where people might be confined indoors or need to seek out companionship more than usual, I don't think this one will result in a baby boom because people are realizing through isolation just how much they hate one another. People who may have been entertaining the idea of trying for a loaf are having second thoughts after spending a LOT of time with their partners. Parents with existing kids are probably thinking more about divorce than anything else and sex is likely happening a LOT less. And also due to isolation, horny married people who aren't banging their spouses also can't go fuck other people and make unnecessary kids that way either.

Meanwhile, when things start re-opening more and more, divorce attorneys and marriage counselors will be up to their eyeballs in business. I foresee a decline in the birth rate, but not so much out of fear as out of hatred for their kids and spouses after having to spend extended periods of time with them.

But, there will always be retarded people who will look at a world that's burning to the ground full of people dying left and right and go, "It is MY basic human right to have a baby!" because as we all know, breeders give zero fucks about the kind of life their offspring will have, just so long as they get to cuddle and coo over a cute baybee... and then have another one two years later when the first one has grown into an asshole toddler and is no longer cute.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
July 06, 2020
One of my interests is the science and business of rollercoasters. I was researching an accident that happened in Japan in 2007, where a young woman was killed when her train derailed and her head impacted a guardrail.

I was reading articles from the early days after the accident, and I came across this gem in the comments:

Quote


Anyone know how old the woman was or if shehad any children? I couldn't imagine how much it would effect a child's ability to get on a ride if their mom or any other relative was killed from it. Even if it doesn't mean much, my best hopes and prayers go to the family of the woman.

JFC, you’re reading about a woman who died when her head was slammed into a guardrail at 40+ MPH through no fault of her own, and this is your first thought?!?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
"Not every ejaculation deserves a name" - George Carlin
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
July 06, 2020
Quote

JFC, you’re reading about a woman who died when her head was slammed into a guardrail at 40+ MPH through no fault of her own, and this is your first thought?!?


WTF?

However, sadly, it's not that uncommon to read shite like this.

Violent shooting where people were killed? Never mind the dead people.....OMG did a chyld possibly see it? Was it near a skool that had to be evacuated?
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
July 10, 2020
Here's an infuriating video interview where a bunch of Moo-Cows are wringing their hands about having to watch their own brats during COVID and how Moos can have a kid or have a job, but not both. playing a violin bawling

I only lasted about two and a half minutes.

The ringleader who wrote the article is demanding "something needs to be done" to not "penalize" parents who cannot do their jobs due to their brats being home. She even suggests that employers not "penalize" moos who choose to homeskool their brats.

So, who does the work in that scenario? We all know: people who have not burdened themselves similarly.

And she's a fucking FOOD BLOGGER, i.e. someone who has not had to work a real fucking job in a long time. Why Ms. self-employed (likely supported by her husband) work-from-home person has dog in this fight is beyond me, other than our Breederific media gives her one.

She also moans about a woman who was fired because she could not conduct calls while her brat was screaming in the background.

WELL, DUH. It's called not performing one's job. Managers can fire people who don't perform, at least for now.

Job performance should be on the basis of PERFORMANCE, not whether one's uterus has had an occupant. These Moos are all about unequal treatment, when it benefits them and their kind.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
July 12, 2020
from what I've read elsewhere, a manager who fired a moo because of the screeching bag of pule? excellent.

two cents ¢¢

CERTIFIED HOSEHEAD!!!

people (especially women) do not give ONE DAMN about what they inflict on children
and I defy anyone to prove me wrong:

The selfish wants of adults outweigh the needs of the child.

If I want to hear the pitter-patter of little feet I'll put shoes on my pets.

Some mistakes cannot be fixed, but some mistakes can be 'fixed'.

People who say they sleep like a baby usually don't have one. Leo J. Burke

Entitlement, thy name is mooooooooooooooo

Adoption agencies have strict criteria (usually). Breeders, whose combined IQ's would barely hit triple digits, have none.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
September 02, 2020
I had to show up for my job as a legislator: MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Being an elected official is one job where you MUST show up to cast your vote. I don't know why this woman didn't get someone to watch her kid while she cast her vote. I guess exposing one's infant to coronavirus to get publicity is more important.

Predictably, there was OUTRAGE and lots of Mooing about how Moooooothers need to be able to vote by proxy.

It does seem to be a little ridiculous that virtual voting is not possible during COVID, and if it's extended to one person, it should be extended to anyone else who is high risk due to a health condition, not just for sprogging, which is a chosen condition.

In the meantime, know the requirements of the job and act accordingly. And if you cannot fulfill the job, let someone else do it.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
September 03, 2020
Waiting for the mombie brigade on this one:

https://www.ladbible.com/news/uk-landlady-bans-kids-from-pub-saying-parents-cant-control-them-20200902

or this one

https://www.ladbible.com/news/uk-pub-bans-under-25s-after-8pm-saying-theyre-impossible-to-control-20200709

_______________________________________________
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
September 11, 2020
So I was watching the national news tonight and the topic was the fires in Northern California and Oregon. The newscaster actually said,

"Several people were killed, including a one year old child."

Professional journalism has gone the way of the dodo bird. Several people?

JFC, if you are going to take the time to research the age of the crotch nugget who died, can you not take the time to at least accurately relay the number of people who lost their lives?

angrily flogging with a whip the world 'fail' on flames
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
September 11, 2020
Quote
bell_flower
JFC, if you are going to take the time to research the age of the crotch nugget who died, can you not take the time to at least accurately relay the number of people who lost their lives?

That, or just leave it at "several people died" or "X number of people of varying ages died." Singling out the kid that died implies that the loss of the child's life was so much more tragic that it deserved its own separate mention. Yeah that's not true - just about any loss of life is tragic and age doesn't magically make one person's death more or less important than another person's. I'm sure people close to the dead kid are heartbroken from their loss, but so aren't the relatives, friends and co-workers of the adult victims who lost their lives.

Child lives do NOT matter more than adult ones.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status
September 11, 2020
This brings up an interesting conundrum, considering that one of these fires was started by a gender reveal gone wrong. If that particular fire kills a kid, who gets the sympathy? The poor breeders who were just trying to celebrate their unborn baby’s genitals, or the innocent widdle child they killed? (Dead adults are an acceptable loss, of course.)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
"Not every ejaculation deserves a name" - George Carlin
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login