I assume the only reason landlords won't rent to welfare recipients is because there is the probability that the tenants won't be able to afford rent. I don't know about the UK, but if someone in the US decides to squat in a property, it can be a bitch to get them out. I also imagine people on the dole can't afford the thousands of dollars landbastards require for all the various deposits just to move in.
I think at least some places in the US allow landlords to discriminate on the basis of income, and so if someone lumbers up with their government money, they may very well get turned away. Even in places where it's illegal to discriminate, landlords will still do it and just not be outright about it. Breeders in general often have no respect whatsoever for other people's property and I'm sure plenty of landlords have horror stories about renting to breeders and having to do thousands in repairs after they leave.
I also question why these fucktards decided to go and get Moo up the duff when they're already getting benefits. Like are you not poor enough, lady? Or did she get knocked up again to get more benefits? That's certainly not unheard of. I honestly do not understand why "don't breed if you're broke" is such a difficult concept to grasp. Do people think having a brat is like having a houseplant and they can just leave it on a windowsill most of the time? If you can't afford contraception, then either be celibate or enjoy sexual activities that don't involve a penis entering a vagina.
Also, if this woman keeps on getting rejected over her income, why doesn't she just not mention she's on benefits? Is there some legal requirement saying she has to disclose that information during those initial meetings? Because if there's not, I don't know why she isn't just keeping that information to herself. It seems to be not working in her favor to mention it.