The problems in your situation are: 1. you cannot give a description of yourself without outing yourself. If you say they were not accommodating of your disability and not following the law with respect to your disability***, they could probably figure out who you are and 2. you are still dependent on them for income. These other people aren't.
*** Because you work for a public entity, the laws are clearer as to how they must accommodate you.
"She said the reporter can investigate things. I told her I filed complaints with the equal opportunity commission."
You could direct them to information that is publicly available through a FOIA request. For example they could ask under FOIA how many people filed complaints with the EEOC, how many were validated, turnover rate, etc. (Of course, they may not answer truthfully or they could skew the numbers,etc.)
"Shawna said to watch the local paper, a story could come out soon. I guess that doesn't guarantee the shitheads will get in trouble."
I'm a long time public servant and I can say, this is sad but true. Generally not much will be done about bad management unless it crosses the line to non-production or criminal behavior.
I'm in favor of merit protected jobs for public employees because I've seen what happens when public employees aren't protected. I once worked in a city where the purchasing agents had zero merit protection--they could be fired at will. The city was rife with corruption. It kept happening over and over, and it went like this: A mayor would be elected. He would appoint his friends to jobs within his administration. Next thing you know, his side businesses and his friends' businesses would be getting contracts. Employees would blow the whistle to the press and after it became too scandalous or embarrassing for the city, the house would be cleaned. Because none of the politicians wanted to empower the employees because they benefited from the system, and because they thought they were lower than dirt, it would happen again. Lather, rinse and repeat.
Unfortunately merit protected jobs mean non-productive people are harder to fire because poor performers take advantage of the rules and nobody wants to to take the time to fire them.
Things generally have to cross the line into criminal behavior before people will be removed, such as mismanaging public funds or falsifying records. I just spent two years under a boss who was completely incompetent. He ran afoul of management, not because of what he was doing to his employees, but because nobody could ever find him and he was falsifying his time card. They finally had to deal with him and he gave them a reason to remove him.
But generally if people are treating their employees unethically, unethical behavior may not be too far away. Keep us posted. Should be interesting.