i agree most dont do anything, but there are some that are exceptions. i live in england where sizes are different altogether so marilyn monroes size is our size really sorry if i confused things. so the size here is different to there. yoyo dieting can screw up a metabolism. its well known
but is it right to lead a kid down to anorexia/bulimia route all for the sake of being thin. and we have all heard of people dying of anorexia/bulimia, the only death i heard of is one where they said the kid drowned in her own fat, but she had a glandular/genetic problem so there has to be a middle ground. between healthy and fat and thin
1% of teenage girls, and 5% of college-age women become anorexic or bulimic.
Anorexia has the highest mortality rate (up to 20%) of any psychiatric diagnosis.
Girls develop eating and self-image problems before drug or alcohol problems; there are drug and alcohol programs in almost every school, but no eating disorder programs
this is a good site
http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=071403A
Myth Three: Those who virtuously eat less or who diet will be slim.
Facts: This may be the biggest -- and most dangerous -- myth of all.
Weight loss diets have been around at least since the 1830s with Sylvester Grahams preaching the sins of gluttony, they started to become a national mania in the mid-1960s. Fatness had become medicalized, and a rapid succession of weight loss products ensued, from various diet pills to diets such as Atkins to full-fledged diet programs such as Weight Watchers. Weight loss measures grew extreme by the 1970s with such high protein diets as Robert Linns liquid diet and the Complete Scarsdale Diet. By the end of that decade there were more than a hundred different diet programs, mostly hosted by doctors, and those numbers had tripled just a few years later. Today, there are literally thousands.
The diet advocates have continuously claimed that by eating less, and less fatty foods, we could all be slim. Americans listened. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, total caloric intake, as well as total fat intake, steadily decreased from 1965 to 1990. During this period, obesity increased dramatically, Steven Blair, P.E.D., president of the Cooper Institute noted in a February 2002 Mayo Clinic Proceedings. The prevalence of obesity, he concluded, is unlikely to be due to increases in daily energy intake.
Were not the only nation to realize that weight gain cant be explained simply by how much people eat. Between 1980 and 1991, the number of heavyweights in England doubled, while Britons were eating 10 percent fewer calories, according to their government.
But American women appear to have been most affected by admonitions to watch what they eat. Before the diet mania, the average American woman took in 3,000 to 5,000 calories a day; today that average woman eats less than 1,600 calories daily and is on some type of weight loss program, according to Frances Berg, M.S., in Women Afraid to Eat -- Breaking Free in Today's Weight-Obsessed World (Healthy Weight Network, 2000).
Yet, studies published in peer-reviewed journals from researchers including R.J. Tuschl, Reinhold G. Laessle and Jane Wardle, have found that women who watch what they eat and are light eaters, or who have dieted, actually weigh more than those who dont restrict the foods they eat -- even though theyre eating about 620 calories less a day! Many fat individuals have spent their lives restricting what they eat, with valiant willpower and self-control; they just dont look like it