Female nipples censored at US arts festivals, due to you know what.

Quote
GoTopless.org
Members of the San Diego, CA Gotopless.org chapter visited the La Jolla, CA arts festival this past weekend and admired the beautiful artwork displayed everywhere, some being painted before their eyes as chalk artists were reproducing classical masterpieces on the pavement.

What surprised them was hearing that the art festival does not allow any female nipple shown on any art pieces, including the classical masterpieces (the artwork must be altered to comply with the censorship!) to allow the event to remain "family friendly". Have we lost our minds??? During the Renaissance, nipples were family friendly, church friendly... and in the 21st century they have suddenly lost their noble status, at least in America since this female nipple banning rule seems to apply to all Art festivals around the country.

Quote
Zzelda
How does this sync with teat feeding Cows swinging their ta tas everywhere?

Hypocrisy much?

You know what would be the ultimate irony? Some dangling teat drips onto one of these artworks landing right in the middle of a breast, thus creating a 'nipple'. And then the artist is jailed forever and ever for committing an act of domestic terrorism.

Quote

Well, exactly. How fucking long are we gonna let them get away with this double standard? Either a tit has to be covered up, or it can be poking out for all the world to see.

Quote
Banshee
If a baybee isn't hanging from a tit on the artwork, then the tit is obscene. eyes2

Quote
Zzelda
How does this sync with teat feeding Cows swinging their ta tas everywhere?

Quote
DivaLasVegas

Quote

Well, exactly. How fucking long are we gonna let them get away with this double standard? Either a tit has to be covered up, or it can be poking out for all the world to see.

This exactly. Stupid moos cry over the whole titfeeding thing, saying it's naychurahl and will flop it out for the world to see. Yet when it it comes to art, they get their panties in a wad over a painting or sculpture of a naked woman. Stupid hypocritical cunts.

Quote
fade_to_pale
Of course, if attractive women with perky bewbs were allowed to show theirs, WITHOUT A KYD ATTACHED, that would just twist those knickers even tighter than if public breast-feeding were permanently banned, everywhere. You know it's true.

Quote
lonecretin
http://gotopless.org/news.php?extend.26.1

Quote
GoTopless.org
Members of the San Diego, CA Gotopless.org chapter visited the La Jolla, CA arts festival this past weekend and admired the beautiful artwork displayed everywhere, some being painted before their eyes as chalk artists were reproducing classical masterpieces on the pavement.

What surprised them was hearing that the art festival does not allow any female nipple shown on any art pieces, including the classical masterpieces (the artwork must be altered to comply with the censorship!) to allow the event to remain "family friendly". Have we lost our minds??? During the Renaissance, nipples were family friendly, church friendly... and in the 21st century they have suddenly lost their noble status, at least in America since this female nipple banning rule seems to apply to all Art festivals around the country.

Quote
yurble
I'm not sure that it is the same moos who are braying that "Breastfeeding is nawtral!" who think that breasts in art are filthy. Just as there are some people who identify as CF whose main purpose in life appears to be to let breeders know how much they love sprogs, breeders can fall into different camps. I expect it's the "earth mother" types who want to let it all hang out and don't mind nude statues, while it's the repressed anti-sex ones that breastfeed in private who want to photoshop fig leaves on classic paintings.

At least, I hope it isn't the same people who are pro public breastfeeding without a drape, and who are also opposed to nudity in any other context. That would be pretty fucked up.

Quote
zatoth

Quote
yurble
I'm not sure that it is the same moos who are braying that "Breastfeeding is nawtral!" who think that breasts in art are filthy. Just as there are some people who identify as CF whose main purpose in life appears to be to let breeders know how much they love sprogs, breeders can fall into different camps. I expect it's the "earth mother" types who want to let it all hang out and don't mind nude statues, while it's the repressed anti-sex ones that breastfeed in private who want to photoshop fig leaves on classic paintings.

At least, I hope it isn't the same people who are pro public breastfeeding without a drape, and who are also opposed to nudity in any other context. That would be pretty fucked up.

chances are-it is the same.

Quote
yurble

Quote
zatoth

Quote
yurble
I'm not sure that it is the same moos who are braying that "Breastfeeding is nawtral!" who think that breasts in art are filthy. Just as there are some people who identify as CF whose main purpose in life appears to be to let breeders know how much they love sprogs, breeders can fall into different camps. I expect it's the "earth mother" types who want to let it all hang out and don't mind nude statues, while it's the repressed anti-sex ones that breastfeed in private who want to photoshop fig leaves on classic paintings.

At least, I hope it isn't the same people who are pro public breastfeeding without a drape, and who are also opposed to nudity in any other context. That would be pretty fucked up.

chances are-it is the same.

Well, it's quite possible--people are capable of an unbelievable lack of self awareness.

Quote
Snark Shark

Quote
CrabCake
But...shit like this is a-okay in their pea-brains:

http://www.us101country.com/pages/madison.html?article=9729100

baby_nipple_hat.jpg

Hippocrits (intentional misspelling and no offense to hippos)!

call that babby a TITHEAD!