Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 22, 2014 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,706 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 623 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 2,308 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 88 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 2,308 |
Quote
tiredchicken
Doesn't sound like she really needed to "go" that bad if she had time to ask, get rejected, send her husband in to argue with them and wait until she finally gets her way.
Also, apparently she doesn't think that non-pregnant persons who need to go really bad should be "honored" by being allowed to use any restroom they please. I guess us non-inpigs can just hold it indefinitely.
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 88 |
Mature, well-adjust adults don't think that being allowed to use a restroom is being "honored," either! LOL. She must not be getting enough attention from her husband if she feels the need for the public to put her on a pedestal even when it comes to something as mundane as going to the bathroom.Quote
StudioFiftyFour
Quote
tiredchicken
Doesn't sound like she really needed to "go" that bad if she had time to ask, get rejected, send her husband in to argue with them and wait until she finally gets her way.
Also, apparently she doesn't think that non-pregnant persons who need to go really bad should be "honored" by being allowed to use any restroom they please. I guess us non-inpigs can just hold it indefinitely.
Sidebar note: Mature, well-adjusted adults do not go through life feeling the need to be "honored."
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 5,654 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 88 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 333 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 464 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 672 |
Quote
rudeawakening
She can't have had to go THAT badly if she had time to argue and then send in her husband to do the same. And she eventually got her way, yet she's still complaining! I only wish the restaurant had stood their ground, and then she pissed and shit her pants and got diaper rash (or should I say, maternity underwear rash).
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 23, 2014 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 2,308 |
Quote
stillwaters
Exactly what I was thinking. A Target bathroom is far from squatting over a hole in the ground and wiping with pine cones. Was she looking for a jewel-encrusted throne and a personal bidet?
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 24, 2014 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 1,227 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 24, 2014 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 201 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 24, 2014 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 579 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 24, 2014 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 379 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 24, 2014 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,735 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 25, 2014 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 260 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 25, 2014 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 2,430 |
Quote
redheadedharlot
What really gets my goat on this one is the comments about disability. Many posted that pregnancy is a choice and not a disability, yet several had to come back with "well, sometimes it's not a choice" - yes it is, abortion is still legal, as is effective birth control in the first place - and that it is like a disability, in that it causes all sorts of "side effects".
To that, I say that it still is a choice, it's pretty much common knowledge the "side effects" that pregnancy has, AND it is temporary. Not many times is the latter mentioned. Whether the pregnancy is "chosen" or not, it is temporary. The person in a wheelchair isn't going to be able to walk again in a few months, nor is the elderly person with a walker getting any younger.
This really chaps my ass. I didn't ask for the problems I have that limit my mobility. And I sure as Hell don't celebrate the root of them.
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 25, 2014 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 173 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 25, 2014 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 769 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 25, 2014 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 201 |
Re: Boo Hoo - restaurant not "honoring" inpignancy August 28, 2014 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 275 |