I don't know why you're picking this argument with me, because I don't even think we're arguing the same thing. I'm not lumping disability and breeder welfare into one boat, because it's simply incorrect to do that. They have vastly different standards for their benefits. I'm still going to go for the disabled person not reporting all their income, within reason, every time. Obviously if they're making thousands of dollars unreported, that's a whole nother animal.
If they made up enough of the population to make a difference, then maybe, but there are simply not a lot of them, way fewer than welfare breeders or undocumented folks. On top of that, there aren't enough of them working under the table that would bring down wages, like say undocumented workers do. Even if every disabled person were to work under the table, I doubt they'd have as much of an economic impact as undocumented workers or welfare breeders currently do.
"if you can WORK why are you on disability?"
This is pretty simple. Because being disabled is expensive, much more expensive that being abled, or being knocked up. It costs a lot, it won't end, you can't cheap out (like breeders) and you'll be dealing with it for the rest of your life. Then there's Work vs. work. I see Work as when you leave your home for X hours a day, and perform duties another person assigns under the conditions that the worksite has. Many employers are unwilling or unable to make the "special accomidations" a disabled person might need to perform job duties at a particular work site, or for x number of hours straight. Many employers are also unwilling to hire a person who may be out sick more often due to the nature of their disability, than a non-disabled worker. Most employers won't hire a blind, wheel chair bound person who can only work 2 days a week because they have to have dialsys 3 days a week, and may be out sick more due to lower immune function. However, that person may be able to perform work (small w) like functions where they earn money at home making braided hemp bracelets. Say they sell $550 dollars in bracelets, but are only supposed to make $500, or LOSE EVERYTHING, I have no problems with them not documenting that extra $50.
"A person on the dole who is working under the table will be able to undercut a full time taxpayer and especially a full time taxpayer with no deductions EVERYTIME."
And whose responsibility is this, really? If these people are working for employers, it is the employer's responsibility to accurately report employee wages. If they are not reporting all the wages they pay their employees, they are breaking the law. If an employer is willing to hire someone under the table, then it is the employer who is breaking the law. Simply put, if all the other whores are offering $20 hand jobs, and I offer a $10 hand job, that doesn't mean you have to take it.
"Disabled people are not always right, or sweet and innocent."
God, how I hate it when people do this. Did I say anything of the sort? No. Simply because I believe that a disabled person should be able to make a couple bucks over their paltry "alloted earnings", without losing EVERYTHING, doesn't mean I think ALL disabled people are great. Yes, I know there are assholes everywhere, I am very conscious of that fact. It truly is the one commonality that every designation of humans you can think of has, there's at least one asshole. It doesn't mean that I have to write off my humanity because of it.