Habitat for Breedermanity

Words cannot describe how much I HATE this organization.

Their only reason for existence is to put badly behaved breeders, who have a bunch of brats they were irresponsible about and could not afford, into quiet neighborhoods, in brand new houses, to encourage more irresponsible breeding.

This organization NEVER gives away a home to a single or childfree couple who has fallen on hard times, NEVER. They are worse than the fucking government when it comes to fucking over the childfree.

An old coworker of mine from some years back was single, disabled and in a wheelchair and applied for one of these homes. He was told no, and that the homes are for "families." I shit you not, that's what he was told when he applied.

That is exactly why I never supported the United Way when I worked for certain companies during their drives for this charity. Last I heard, the UW supports Habitat for Hos. You are right now a childfree or empty nester cannot get what almost amounts to a free house as there is no interest on the "loan".

I've said this before but will repeat myself. Back in 1997 when I worked weird hours in a call center as "0" operator for US Sprint, I was asked by one of the priests of my parish -- when I was still trying to be Catholic -- to help out by swinging a hammer for H-f-H on the one weekend a month I was off. No fucking way!

For one thing, I was not getting my ass out of the bed after working 'til 1am or so. Another thing, no one would pay MY medical bills if I got hurt working on this project for a moo who would not appreciate the efforts of the free labour. I am quite certain a person has to sign a liability waiver before volunteering for such a project!

These breeder cunts already get "my support" via my taxes to pay for schools and welfare.

Yet another charity to reward breeders for THIER poor life choices. I only give to pet charities! I would also give to old people if I had more money!!

This bullshit and the bullshit programs the gubbermint has where they give money to people to buy their first home. In my area there was just an article about this woman from some country, who came here in 2000 and got money to buy a beautifully restored row home in town. What's wrong with this picture? They act like this is a good thing. I don't know who I hate more, bleeding hearts or breeders.

KidFreeLuvnLife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know who I hate more,
> bleeding hearts or breeders.

I don't give a fuck who calls me a "racist" but I hate the bleeding heart Libs the worst because they pander to the illegal and other foreigner vote while just handing over our country to them. Eventually, the USA will be another Banana Republic Third World country. If you are white and work hard, you will bend over and take it up even further to pay for these breeders.

God, you know what would make my day?

To organize a protest made up of disabled folks and lower income childfree folks to protest outside of habitat for breedermanity house projects and their local offices.

You know a few people to stand around out front for a couple of hours a week with big signs that say stuff like:

"Habitat only rewards people who have had children they can't afford, no homes available for the single disabled or low income childless!"

I wouldn't mind hitting some other charities with protests like that either.

"Those who have children irresponsibly receive government benefits, plus benefits from _____ charity. The childless receive nothing!"

Help me think up some more good signs. lol.

Oh and Habitat for Breedermanity is supposed to be some kind of Christian organization.

Fucking Jesus himself WAS A CHILDFREE MAN, by every definition of childfree-- he, BY CHOICE, did not have children. And although Jesus said to bring the little children unto him, he also went around healing ADULTS and helping ADULTS.

Habitat for Breedermanity is not at all like the ministry of Jesus.

Amethusos said, "That is exactly why I never supported the United Way when I worked for certain companies during their drives for this charity. Last I heard, the UW supports Habitat for Hos."

A company I worked for used to push United Way too. I took offense at UW's practice in the 1980s of telling you how much you "should" give based on your income. Screw you—you get what I choose to give, as it's a gift, jerks. I noticed then the absence of animal charities and never did participate, as I had reached the conclusion then that people make their own problems for the most part. Then came the scandal involving the Aramonys' Concorde flights and other stolen perks, paid for by—you guessed it—suckers' donations...

We just got a bunch of homes built here by an organization like HfH (but it wasn't them). Not only were the six homes for breeders only, but you had to be a specific race in order to get them.

The only good news is that the homes are in a terrible neighbourhood.

Remember, kids, the tax system is designed to funnel money from those who make "wrong" lifestyle choices to those who make "right" lifestyle choices.

Acme Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Remember, kids, the tax system is designed to
> funnel money from those who make "wrong" lifestyle
> choices to those who make "right" lifestyle
> choices.

The "right" lifestyle choice being having a litter you cannot afford and are ill-equipped emotionally, mentally and physically to care for and the "wrong" lifestyle choice being those who wisely realized they were not equipped emotionally, mentally or physically and/or could not afford to support children, NOT HAVING ANY DAMN BRATS TO BURDEN EVERYONE ELSE WITH.

How fucked up our priorities are. How fucked up it is that not only our tax system but every goddamned "human" charity I've ever know of, except the ones giving out birth control and sterilizations, FAVORS and REWARDS
people who bring children into the world to suffer.

The next time I have to listen to some jackass, most notably, my NPR mealy mouthed relatives start preaching on "the less fortunate" and blubbering on about "helping" I'm going to ask them how they sleep at night knowing that what they do encourages more child torture and death.
Because I'd really REALLY would like to know how these people, fairly intelligent people BTW, cannot get from A to B on this issue and see how
everything they do is completely counter productive in terms of saving lives.

people forget that governments, are there to make money for the politicians.

so they take $50 from you, pay $20 to the breeder charities etc. because breeders vote more, and they are creating more voters.

and the government takes the rest for their own wages, unpopular wars, who are provided by weapons and others stuff by the very companies that the politicians own, there is no altruism when it involves the government, just how much money can we screw out of people, and how long can we remain in power.

this is the same with most organisations, they are only creating the next generation of mindless drones, to vote for who they say to vote for. this is all parties, all countries. its not about caring, its about money and power

*********************************************************************************************************************************
I just post the stories, for interest.. for everyone

Lord, what fools these mortals be!
- A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Act III, Scene ii

Voltaire said: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."

H.L.Mencken wrote:"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. Albert Einstein

BTW, I wanted to mention a funny little tidbit that has so far, supported everything I've ever thought in terms of how we SHOULD STOP REWARDING BREEDERS.

I'm currently taking a behavior analysis class, specifically, this class is taught to teach positive reinforcement and shaping techniques employed by psychologists dealing with children who have behavioral problems and adults with personality disorders and applies the techniques to teaching parrots. These techniques are widely accepted as solid behavioral science, employed by many in social services and so on and is considered the "gold standard" of behavioral modification.

It's a pretty complex class, but in a nutshell it goes something like this:

You ignore the behaviors you want to diminish and consistently reward the behaviors you want more of. Ok, that's a pretty simplistic explanation of it, there is a lot more, such as the specific identification of behaviors and their sources, figuring out what to reward, analyzing various scenarios, etc etc etc etc, but you get the picture.

And even more so since I have been taking this class I realize the breeders and their minions in government, social services, charity, are perpetuating a death and torture culture centered around children. Either that or they are so fucking blind and selfish that they cannot realize what they are doing.

Or, even more disturbing, as much as they like to accuse the childfree of being childhaters, they really have much more hate for children than I could ever conjure up on my own. Sure I hate kids! I hate the noise, the smell, the annoyance; but I don't hate kids enough to wish death or torture on any child, which is why breeding should not be an inalienable
right. Children's lives are more important than adults selfish, primitive need to breed. I guess that's what really makes me different from the breeders, I don't hate children the way they do. My hate is like the way I hate soggy corn flakes or broccoli. Their hate is death and destruction in order to fulfill a selfish want. Fucking sick ass shit, the fuckin' breeders.

k-man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> A company I worked for used to push United Way
> too. I took offense at UW's practice in the 1980s
> of telling you how much you "should" give based on
> your income.

Americans scream about socialism but these organizations and the head honchos on the job who want to look "good" act very socialist by stating what should be given based on earnings. Isn't that the idea of Socialism of how those 'in need' are able to take from someone who has more? I really need to read the Ayn Rand book I have in the house, Atlas Shrugged. The only people who want to benefit off of socialism in this country are the breeders.

nowhiggers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> How fucked up our priorities are. How fucked up it
> is that not only our tax system but every
> goddamned "human" charity I've ever know of,
> except the ones giving out birth control and
> sterilizations, FAVORS and REWARDS
> people who bring children into the world to
> suffer.

The Catholic Church has too much clout with our politicians. "Family planning" groups are denied federal funds if they talk about abortion when overseas dealing with third worlders. YES...our politicians and the Holy Babble Thumpers would rather see people suffer and die rather than prevent these births from happening.

> The next time I have to listen to some jackass,
> most notably, my NPR mealy mouthed relatives start
> preaching on "the less fortunate" and blubbering
> on about "helping" I'm going to ask them how they
> sleep at night knowing that what they do
> encourages more child torture and death.

NPR are also Poverty Pimps like the Roman Catholic Church and pro-lifers.

amethusos* Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> k-man Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > A company I worked for used to push United Way
> > too. I took offense at UW's practice in the
> 1980s
> > of telling you how much you "should" give based
> on
> > your income.
>
> Americans scream about socialism but these
> organizations and the head honchos on the job who
> want to look "good" act very socialist by stating
> what should be given based on earnings. Isn't that
> the idea of Socialism of how those 'in need' are
> able to take from someone who has more? I really
> need to read the Ayn Rand book I have in the
> house, Atlas Shrugged. The only people who want to
> benefit off of socialism in this country are the
> breeders.

Selective socialism, such as what we have in America to reward breeders who act irresponsibly and continue to act irresponsibly, dare I say, is not at all very different than the "National Socialism" practiced by Adolf Hitler in 1940s Germany.

BTW, I hate it when people start bringing Hitler up into any conversation, but, I just really feel that it's the best possible example I can give here.

"National Socialism" was essentially selective socialism. Eventually it devolved into genocide, but before the murdering really got started, the programs of National Socialism were specifically designed to reward the behaviors and races approved by Nazi ideology. If you were a white blonde breeder, even out of wedlock, you were set up for life.

Anyways, what I'm trying to point out here is that outside of Nazi Germany, America is the only nation in the world that practices "selective socialism." None of the other socialist-democratic socialist countries do this in the west. Everyone gets healthcare, education, job help and some bootstraps in the other countries that practice socialist ideas.

Now let me ask you this. You think the breeders in America would throw a fit if they thought that maybe they wouldn't be able to get expensive brand name drugs for bratley, but instead had to settle for generics, so that uninsured adults could have some health coverage? Oh fuck yeah the Nazis would throw a fit, you betcha!!!!

I don't know who these breeders think is paying for bratleys free health coverage, because with their child tax credits, it sure as fuck isn't them. You'd think they'd want to keep us as healthy for as long as possible so they could keep working us into the ground to support bratley n' fambly. What happens when more and more childless and childfree start dropping out of the tax system by virtue of disability from years of no health care? Talk about shortsightedness.

anyways, if we are going to have medicaid, everyone should be able to use it, not just the "select few" like we have now.

and another thing - as for "lifestyle choices" if we are going to have socialism then ALL lifestyle choices, including smoking cigs and having babies should be covered equally.

It seems like having children might just be profitable, and as a result, a good life choice. I mean, it's not like I'd actually have to do any work to raise them, most breeders don't.

Who's with me on the breeding money train?!! Whooohooo!
:sw
(sarcasm off)

"It truly is the one commonality that every designation of humans you can think of has, there's at least one asshole."
--Me

Here’s a sign idea:

Habitat for Humanity? Where' s the humanity? They build homes for humans who breed irresponsibly, including criminals.

My employer does fundraising drives for this charity (soliciting via email). I delete those emails so fast. I’m waiting for someone to mention it to me in person so I can bring up this case. Unbelievable!

I loath Habitat! They totally discriminate. Matter of fact, I'd love to try to apply and when I get turned down, tell them what I think.