A few quotes from leaders of the National Parenting Association who were bashing statements in Elinor Burkett's book, The Baby Boon...
"This is pernicious, it's brand-new, it's gaining traction," she bristles, as she proceeds to take "Baby Boon" apart fact by fact. Yes, there is a new per-child tax credit, she says, ticking her objections off on her fingers, but that paltry $500 hardly "redistributes the nation's wealth to those with children," as Burkett claims. "The fact is that our tax code has tilted in favor of those without children," she counters, and because the standard dependent deduction has decreased as a percentage of income, parents are getting far less help from the government than they did a generation ago.
"That deduction," she fumes, "is one of the things she (Burkett) harps on because it's one of the few things you can hang your hat on because it's one of the few things parents do get." But look at the cost side of the balance sheet, she says. She points out that a two-parent household with an income of up to $62,000 a year will spend about $160,000 to feed, clothe and shelter a child until the age of 18. "And this figure doesn't even include college tuition," she adds. It also doesn't include income lost by women who have children. Quoting data from a 1998 study, Hewlett says that childless women now earn 90 percent of what their male counterparts earn, while mothers earn only 73 percent.
Me: Well, whether or not the tax credit has decreased over time is irrelevant. Burkett's point was that parents shouldn't be getting ANY special tax perks because they CHOSE to breed and we, the CF, shouldn't be paying for their CHOICE. Idiot.
***
Lisa Benenson, the editor in chief of Working Mother magazine, agrees: "The vast majority of people in this country do not have flex time, do not get to go home early." As for benefits packages, she says, childless workers are not alone in not using all available benefits. "Do you deny someone a benefit just because you can't take advantage of that benefit? Do you deny someone mental health coverage because you don't need mental health coverage? If the person at the desk next to you gets cancer, do you think of them as 'earning' more because their health dollar costs are higher?"
Me again: Ummmmm, again, it was a CHOICE to breed. Last I checked, I don't think many people CHOOSE to be mentally ill, or get cancer. Do these people have brains? Talk about warping reality to make a case for a pathetic cause.