Just what I luv about breeder parents. 'OH, save babbeeee at any cost..'
just so the little bugger can grow up and be totally aware that he/she is dying and understands the concept. how kind is that?
next door neighbors, really very nice people, had a child that, for whatever horrible reason, got (thru no fault of his own) one of those damnable heart destroying viruses. He was only about 2 at the time, or less. My opinion would be to let the child go while he is unwaware of dying. My belief where he goes he would be better off (funny how people talk about heaven, babies
are guaranteed it (I'll catch it for this remark) but will move heaven and earth to keep the baby alive. This kid has a transplant heart, is living a relatively good life, but most likely will not live a full life. (The heart will give out eventually.
This is what convinces me that having children and 'saving these little defectives' is all about the mother, rather than what is best for the child.
Sounds horrid, but if a baby is gonna die at 5 months, I'd rather see it go then, then live to 5 or so and be completely aware of it.
