Oh noes, mommies don't like boobies if there's no brat to be fed :td

Quote
Peace

Quote
screaming sausage
Interestingly, Facebook is the other way round- they allow plenty of borderline pornographic photos to be posted but delete breastfeeding pics (where the nipples are hidden by a sprog's head), pics of mastectomy scars (where the breasts aren't even there, and photos of body art (where the breasts are covered by tattoos or body paint), tasteful artistic nide photos, etc. Their view is that female nudity is only acceptable if it's sexual and can give men a boner, otherwise it's icky and wrong. People need to act with a bit of consistency here! Boobs are either bad or they're not!

Oh really? You've never seen the Fb page The Leaky B@@b , now have you?

FB removes what they feel are nudity or semi-nude photos, EXCEPT the udder feeding photos, because in the past they caught hell from a moo group for deleting titfeeding photos.

That moo group was raising hell around the time one of my oldest friends got oopsed and sprogged. I remember because my feed filled up with his wife's tit and, "Take THAT FB!!!"

Good luck getting some imaginary world standard on bewbs. I recommend Nat'l Geo standards, let em free! Piss off moos mightily, then we'll have some entertainment!
Suddenly they'll realize that they are actually ageist and no bewbs under 32 years old should be shown, in the hopes that everyone gets oops'd or heads for their bellybutton by then.

I can still pass the pencil test, and I'm 36 and have gained and lost more than your average fatass moo's "baby weight". Since my mom's would like to meet her bellybutton, I can only assume the most damage is caused by breastfeeding or the drain on bodily resources that a parasite causes.

Quote
screaming sausage
Personally I don't mind GQ- I'll read it in the hairdresser's because the articles are sometimes good and the women's magazines are mindless and unreadable, plus there are FAR worse men's magazines out there. That said I still think a copy of GQ is a totally inappropriate free gift as there are plenty of people who wouldn't want pictures of naked women sent to their homes for various reasons. The problem I have here is that the "...but I'm a MOOOOOO and it might warp Bratley and Bratlina's fragile little minds" seems to be treated as the only valid excuse for not wanting to see naked women- every other woman is "just JELUS" or "a feminazi who wants to spoil things for the men".

Some people would rather not see any breasts. Personally, I think if men are allowed to go topless, women should be allowed to as well. I loathe breastfeeding campaigns in part because they never want to fight for the right of women to go topless without a baby attached (and the same people tend to whine massively when someone does show her breasts like that), although the bodily fluids thing bothers me as well.

Fortunately I live in (mainland) Europe so nobody will bat an eye if I take off my top at the beach, and I'd get strange looks if I went into the sauna clothed. When I see breastfeeding it's not so obvious and is clearly done with the intent of feeding the infant rather than showing off. The attention-whoring with breastfeeding seems to go hand-in-hand with a highly sexualized view of breasts which I observe primarily in the anglo-saxon sphere.

Quote
Presto
I can still pass the pencil test, and I'm 36.

I still pass it, and I'm 51. Not baking a loaf has its advantages.

Quote
crazy old crone
These moos, don't they realize that their baybay 14 year old sons are probably over at their buddy's house pouring over the good, dirty magazine's he pilfered from his Dad or older brother? Teenaged boys can't have changed that much since I was a kid.

showing your age here, he's probably seen higher-res video clips of girl-on-girl action on the iPad in his bedroom,it's not like BNP actually moniter internet usage, and most kids have their own devices nowadays. Even modern smart phones have pretty good screens now