GOP wants to end saying "pro-life"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/republicans-trying-term-pro-life-022721958.html

and start saying "pro-baybee" Although that could be countered with the real name of the game "pro-control"

https://news.yahoo.com/mexicos-supreme-court-upholds-abortion-214554094.html

Well, Mexico is progressing as this country is going backwards

That's good because pro-lifers are certainly not in favor of life if we're talking in terms of quality of life or life of the mother, which is always more important than that of a clump. Pro-baby sounds about right because all they care about is forcing unnecessary people to be born. But the second those women try to reach out for help for the kids they didn't want, the loudest and proudest pro-lifers are nowhere to be found because they're off harassing other vulnerable pregnant women into forced birth.

It should really be forced birth or pro-birth, because they don't give a shit what kind of life the kid has after it's born.

They want to punish women for having sex then force those women to give birth. If women have to do it in poverty, all the better.

Republicans are fond of a pliable, disposable workforce where people do not have access to unions or fair treatment.

This is why neither party wants to address the problem of illegal immigration. Who would watch their kids, clean their houses and take care of their lawns?

I never consider them pro-life. To me, they are anti-choice or pro-forced-birth. Take your pick.

They're not pro-baby, they are pro-FETUS. Point-blank period!

Quote
cinja
They're not pro-baby, they are pro-FETUS. Point-blank period!

They're not pro-fetus or baby. They're pro-control of a female body. Once the brat is born, they will fling baby AND mother in the dumpster and light the thing with a match.

+++++++++++++

Passive Aggressive
Master Of Anti-brat
Excuses!

They should refer to it as anti-women. This has nothing to do with babies other than they are the unfortunate end-product and unwanted in these cases. More than anything I think they like watching women "pay" for having sex and also watching them have all their free will stole from them, often devastating them financially and greatly curtailing their choices. Nothing does that better than forced births. Women have kids and there is huge list of restrictions on their lives: can't leave baby alone, kid must be in school, responsible for kid until 18, women are almost always the primary caretakers, no free time because kid must constantly be watched, very difficult to impossible to give up custody, severe cultural/familial backlash for not loving their mistake, etc.

This is why birth control/abortions/sterilization should be free. Any of these options are much cheaper than feeding and insuring a kid for 18 years.

not so much one up and one down (mexico, us) the powers that be thrive on third world conditions. easy to manipulate and then execute (china, russia ... killed millions... the inquisition doesn't hold a candle to their accomplishments)

two cents ¢¢

CERTIFIED HOSEHEAD!!!

No one is more arrogant towards women, more aggressive or scornful, than the man who is anxious (insecure..my word) about his virility. Simone de Beauvoir

people (especially women) do not give ONE DAMN about what they inflict on children and I defy anyone to prove me wrong

Dysfunctional relationships almost always have a child. The more dysfunctional, the more children. The selfish wants of adults outweigh the needs of the child.

Some mistakes cannot be fixed, but some mistakes can be 'fixed'.

People who say they sleep like a baby usually don't have one. Leo J. Burke

Adoption agencies have strict criteria (usually). Breeders, whose combined IQ's would barely hit triple digits, have none.