Not the Mama Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ewww, I can't stand seeing public breastfeeding,
> let alone on a magazine cover with an overexposed
> moo-lebrity! There are already people lauding her
> for being a symbol to "promote" breastfeeding. Big
> WTF? I didn't even know that drooping udders in a
> cootch-muffin's mouth was going out of style
> enough to need celebrity endorsement!
>
> Here's an interesting fact: Angelina said once
> that she NEVER wanted to give birth biologically,
> she only wanted to adopt. That is until she met
> her a mayyyun (B.Pitt) that changed her mind. Yet,
> she's supposed to be a charitable humanitarian,
> apparently without caring one whit about
> overpopulation and the overuse of natural
> resources. Prime example of how moohood kills any
> sense of logic and practicality.
Yeah, the tired, "...love of my life, we wanted to create a blending of ourselves" defense. These two won't even be together in a few years in all likelihood. Parenthood is selfish on so many levels it's ridiculous. This idea that parenthood is selfish is clearly supported by the "issues" which crop up after the baybee cuteness, the dressing the little replicas in matching moo-daughter outfits, and the toddler stage is gone. Once the little bastard starts exhibiting it's own personality and personal likes, dislikes, and opinions, and they don't match up with moomie and duddy's, the fun is over and Chuck E. Cheese has left the building. Being a celebrity on the "beautiful crowd" circuit is completely meaningless and worthless once the new wears off and their uterus has to be tacked up or removed so they can walk without their fallen twat bouncing against their upper thighs.