Breederific movie plot lines

I don't think this even qualifies as a plot line, more like a veering off course for no reason. We watched "High Crimes" (2002) last night, with Ashley Judd and Morgan Freeman. Fairly suspenseful if predictable...a good diversion for an evening.

If you haven't seen this and want to....SPOILER AHEAD....you've been warned.

...










Anyhoo, Ashley Judd plays a high-powered attorney...with baby rabies. Early in the movie, they make it clear that she wants to breed when she sees a woman on the street holding a baby. "Baby alert!" she screams, and runs over to oooooh and ahhhhh over the loaf. PLEASE. Later, she finds out she's knocked up by her husband, who she's trying to clear of a murder charge. She's SOOO HAPPPPYYYY...until she gets beat up by some shady characters associated with her not-so-squeaky-clean hubby...and loses the baybee. The scene where she's in the hospital and finds that out is just vomitrocious. You'd think she'd just been told she had a fatal disease and just weeks to live. The SCREAMING!

WHAT is the purpose of including this? I suppose for most people it's supposed to induce sympathy for the character, but for me it's just fucking IRRELEVANT. I hate this shit!!

I thought the Kill Bill story would have been better without the daughter. Especially the whole puketastic "As soon as I found out I was pregnant my life became all about the baby" drivel that she spouts at the end.

Three Men and a Baby...yeah, it's really realistic that three bachelors who get a baby foisted on them would eventually miss caring for it and ask the moo live with the three of them so the baybee won't have to go. Bull-fucking-shit.

Some of my all time favorite movies have had breeder undertones, side stories involving spawn, or just outright revolved around breederism. I would have expected a bit more of that with the old movies, but I do believe that it's worse in more modern movies of the past 25 years or so when women were getting "equal rights", so called. Some of the breederific sub plots and undertones are so subtle that many people don't notice or it's so ground into everyones' brain, 'BREED BREED BREEEEEEDDDDD", that no one ever even thinks of any other options. Back to the Future, is a good example. If you strip the movie down to the main plot then it's basically about Marty trying to make sure that his parents have that first kiss at the dance or he and all of his siblings will just disappear from the picture, literally. Even at the end, the last thing professor says to them after having visited the future is, "It's your KIDS I am worried about!" or something like that. I remember thinking that maybe Marty and his girlfriend didn't WANT any kids. If I had been Marty I would have gotten into that Delorean and set it to 15 minutes before each conception and skipped sex that night, or something. Was I the only young person in the theatre who thought that way? Probably so, unless some of you happened to be there.

I think that one reason The Exorcist was such a huge box office hit is because it was a CHYLDD who Satan possessed. I doubt it would have had the same impact if it had been the girls'mother or even the priest. Same thing with The Omen and little Damien doing all of his demonic crap. Amityville Horror was surrounding a famblee as well as Poltergeist. The famous line, "They're heeeeere" wouldn't have been NEARLY as effective had it come from an adult's mouth. They also played up the mother-daughter bonding thing when moomie could feel her very soul pass through her like it was some sort of cosmic rebirth or something. I would have liked the movies had they done away with the brats, but possessed adults and adults in danger just don't appeal to public fear and sympathy like it does if it's a chylllld.

Classic movies like Madame X, Mildred Pierce, The Birds, Imitation of Life, Gone with the Wind, It's a Wonderful Life, Jaws, ALL of the Irwin Allen disaster movies of the 70's, and many more have breeder undertones and/or sub plots. I think that the attempt at mainstreaming blended famblees is the latest trend with familiar plots like a step mom/dad with a not so accepting step brats, go on a trip, something tragic happens, and then they are best friends once the step risks their life for said kid, there are TONS of those types. I think that the remake of Homeward Bound was COMPLETELY ruined by the new blended famblee sub plot as well as the remake of The Invasion of the Body Snatchers where Meg Tilley was the step moo, which was completely unnecessary to the storyline. Night of the Twisters had a blended famblee subplot as do numerous others and made for tv movies are among the worst offenders.

I REALLY hate the movies and shows where the main character is a staunch career woman and approaching menopause, gets knocked up and acquires a bad case of baybee rabies. Regardless of their accomplishments over the past 20 years or so, regardless of if they are married, they got knocked up by rape or by their best friend's husband, or their health isn't so good, they make the character center her WHOLE LIFE around the pregnancy and have her pretend she is estatic and happier than she has ever been in her life! The only thing worse, which they do quite often, is have the woman actually make an appointment at an abortion clinic and have a last minute change of heart and dramatically jump off of the table or hastily leave and decide to keep their baybee. I HATE THAT worse than anything because it is very unrealistic. They pulled that stunt on Nip/Tuck when Julia was divorced from Matt and got knocked up with the lobster boy baybee at 40+ years of age.

One of my all time favorites was (notice the tense) Parenthood. I've decided that I've probably seen that movie enough, anyway. It came out at a time when single motherhood was becoming more common.

Remember Joaquin (the ugly Pheonix who lived) as the "troubled young boy" who's single mother couldn't relate to him as he started to "become a man" and jack off to porn? Awww, he just needs a fah-ther figger! Good old Keanu to the rescue! Ugh... Then there was his sister, Julie, who was Keanu's girlfriend. Talk about the UGLIEST fucking actress! Bitch was in Goonies, too. I was going through a dorky, ugly time when I first saw it and I remember thinking, "How in the hell did that hideous whore get such a gorgeous boyfriend?!" And the skank gets knocked up, of course, 'cause that's the entire plot.

The message is the typical and disgusting, "No matter what (how they FUCK your life) it's aaaaaaaaaaaaaLLLLLL worth it!" Even if they can't stop gambling and show up on your doorstep again, this time with a son named "Cool" in tow. Then go on to blow your retirement on a losing bet, even after you offer him a good job at the fucking family business. Beautiful. Even if they're little you's...little rat-faced, stressed out, high strung pussies (Steve Martin as the dad), even if they fuck their boyfriends in their bedrooms and get knocked up, taking pictures of the event and getting those mixed up with yours.

At the end, all of the families have busted out another one and are thrilled. Especially ugly slutface and her Keanu. GAGs I think I'm over that brainwashing shit.

GREAT example, Seacreature. I had almost totally forgotten about that one....and I remember thinking the EXACT same thing... and really disliking that movie, although everyone else seemed to think it was swell.

I also remember thinking "yeah, THAT would be the day that I would get away with ANY of that crap"...I literally would have been thrown out of the house (after a decent beating, of course). I remember wondering if that was how "normal" parents reacted to things?! as my parents were really strict.

I am also really starting to believe that most people are just not as bothered by the drama/problems/situations that we here would find absolutely intolerable.

kidlesskim Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think that the remake of Homeward Bound was
> COMPLETELY ruined by the new blended famblee sub
> plot as well as the remake of The Invasion of the
> Body Snatchers where Meg Tilley was the step moo,
> which was completely unnecessary to the storyline.

I've been watching the TV series "Invasion" and it's the same thing - it took me forever to figure out who the parents of all the brats and half/stepbrats were. Seriously, what the fuck?!?

And it's still all about breeding, anyway. There's a creepy knocked-up teenager, and her baybees might be aliens or whatever. Reminds me of "V", from the 80s.

The ending of "Minority Report" was also puketastic, BTW.

Ugh. All the main hollywood studios have a vested interest in supporting the 'moral majority' and their idea of what's good and proper for other people to watch. You're supposed to get your heartstrings pulled whenever a kid is onscreen. And you're supposed to feel lots of sympathy for parents onscreen. Makes me laugh how that particular showbiz dust has absolutely zero effect on me, and I know I'm not alone in that notion.

The irony of the whole thing is that the ONE phrase which sends a chill down the spines of normal human adults -- CF or breeder -- is the icy cold freakish phrase: child actor. uuuuuuggggghhhh, its the most unnatural and revolting brand of living creature on the face of the earth. They jig around cutely in front of the cameras like Shirley Temple four hours a day or look into the lens and make 'meaningful' speeches scripted by adult screenwriters about deep feelings that children their age simply are not capable of having, they walk off the set and spend the rest of their freakish leisure time drunk, drugged, and being shagged by studio executives.

(Hey don't think I'm sick -- I've read enough hollywood exposes to know how these film industry fat cats treated their 'speshul little stars'!)

- - - - - - - -
"The death of creativity is a pram in the hallway"
- Cyril Connolly

Live action is not the only place to be breederific.

How about animated films like "Shrek"?

Shrek looked HAPPY being a loner. And then he met a human princess who eventually turned into a female Shrek (becoming an overweight moo, in other words) so he could mate with her. The donkey also mated with the DRAGON to spawn flying baby donkeys!

So - this is the message that love ALWAYS produces babies, no matter what.

That is why I LOATHED LOATHED LOATHED the ending of the first Shrek movie, BTW!:scr

Last nite, "Look Who's Talking" was on. Talk about breederific.

Seacreature Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One of my all time favorites was (notice the
> tense) Parenthood. I've decided that I've
> probably seen that movie enough, anyway. It came
> out at a time when single motherhood was becoming
> more common.
>
> Remember Joaquin (the ugly Pheonix who lived) as
> the "troubled young boy" who's single mother
> couldn't relate to him as he started to "become a
> man" and jack off to porn? Awww, he just needs a
> fah-ther figger! Good old Keanu to the rescue!
> Ugh... Then there was his sister, Julie, who was
> Keanu's girlfriend. Talk about the UGLIEST
> fucking actress! Bitch was in Goonies, too. I
> was going through a dorky, ugly time when I first
> saw it and I remember thinking, "How in the hell
> did that hideous whore get such a gorgeous
> boyfriend?!" And the skank gets knocked up, of
> course, 'cause that's the entire plot.
>
Not a fan of miss Samantha, huh? LOL

Ok, I've got one that's a little offbeat. Did anyone notice how obsessed Steve Martin's character was with his daughter's sex life in "Father of the Bride"? It got really weird.

I've got one: anyone remember that Rebecca De Mornay movie, The Hand that Rocks the Cradle?

Rebecca's character was the psycho-wannabe-moo whose ultimate goal was to take over the role of mom for another woman's kids. Her husband was a perverted gynecologist who got his jollies groping his female patients, and one of his patients presses charges. When the gyno realizes he'll have to go to court and that his life is pretty much kaput after this, he shoots himself. Rebecca's character is so distraught that she miscarries. After that, she poses as a nanny so she can gain access to the mom who she feels was responsible for her husband and baby's death.
She spends her time being buddy-buddy with the other woman's daughter, trying to win her trust and affection, and doing psycho moo things like breast pumping and feeding the other woman's infant. She spouts corny, breederific lines such as: "When your baby is hungry it's my breast that feeds him!" and other such drivel.

Rebecca acted the part well, and the character certainly came across as slightly smarter than the average moo - it was a revenge fantasy, but the entire underlying current is who gets control of the CHYLDRUN because they are the ultimate prize.

It has the corniest ending, too. (Uh...I guess don't read this paragraph if anyone doesn't want to be spoiled, but I doubt it. )

The family with the kids also has a retarded man that helps around the house doing yard work and such. The moo won't let him hold the baby because she's afraid he'll drop him. At the end, after the climactic final battle with Rebecca (dun dun DUN), the retarded guy holds the baby and shows that he was perfectly capable of defending it and holding it without damaging it. They all have a warm, chocolate-chip-cookie moment over the retarded guy holding the infant. AWWWWWWWW.

The messages of this film are threefold:

*Avoid creepy gynecologists

*Being a mom is the most important thing in the world; in fact, it's so important, that if you can't have one of your own, make sure you go out of your way to acquire one that belongs to someone else

*Retarded people are awesome, funny people who do excellent yard work and just want to make it in this mixed-up, crazy world, and even THEY can hold infants, god dammit

Rose, I DID notice that! That movie is a little too over-the-top.

Yea, "Father of the Bride" was a bit strange in that way. I think with a few tweaks and the focusing on the careers of both the bridge and groom, it could have been a more hip, childfree movie.

Of course Kimberly Williams is a breeder in real life, now.



Rose Red Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok, I've got one that's a little offbeat. Did
> anyone notice how obsessed Steve Martin's
> character was with his daughter's sex life in
> "Father of the Bride"? It got really weird.

Banshee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Live action is not the only place to be
> breederific.
>
> How about animated films like "Shrek"?
>
> Shrek looked HAPPY being a loner. And then he met
> a human princess who eventually turned into a
> female Shrek (becoming an overweight moo, in other
> words) so he could mate with her. The donkey
> also mated with the DRAGON to spawn flying baby
> donkeys!
>
> So - this is the message that love ALWAYS produces
> babies, no matter what.
>
> That is why I LOATHED LOATHED LOATHED the ending
> of the first Shrek movie, BTW!:scr


Shrek, an otherwise very entertaining animation, was RUINED by the ogre baybee rabies and the donkey/dragon baybee making side romance as well. That movie epitomizes the fairy tale fantasy of the typical childfree at heart father (who I happen to think MANY are) who is COMPLETELY against spawning to the point that he has nighmares about it. Then, once he is faced with his vulgar, stinky, projectile vomiting offspring it was all worth it, he is delighted, and he just naturally albeit it clumsily, falls head over hills in love with his love spawn monstors and fatherhood becomes second nature. This of course rarely ever happens and when it does, it's more of a defeat and acceptance thing than it is delight.

NOTHING can be shown on TV which doesn't revolve around kyds. There is a new and very depressing series on right now called, Breast Cancer Diaries. The first one had this young woman (a moomie, of course) who is scheduled for a double mastectomy with a follow up of chemo-therapy. I had to change the channel when it seemed the majority of her conversation was about how she had her kyd (s) to live for, how she had arranged for a sitter for Shitford while she was going through the chemo, (WHERE THE FUCK IS DUDDY?), and how the youngest bastard was having behavioral problems (she spelled out t-a-n-t-r-u-m-s) due to her illness, and the channel changer clincher; "...I put my career on hold to become a Stay At Home Moo, and now I have to put motherhood on hold to deal with this cancer".

PALEASE!!!!!!!I can not IMAGINE having that type of life threatening, deadly, and invasive cancer, a painful and disfiguring surgery lined up the next day, and on the forefront of my brain are those fucking kyds. If that doesn't prove that giving birth causes brain damage, mental illness, etc.......then I don't know what would. It is UNNATURAL to be whining about their moomiehood being curtailed when they are facing death. pain, and disfigurement. It's probably a coping mechanism of some sort to get their mind OFF the cancer horror and re-focused, but it sure comes across as bizarre behavior. Why don't they EVER depict or interview a CF cancer survivor? Are CF cancer survivors simply not as media worthy or possibly, could it be that fewer CF people get cancer OR do they statistically die from it in greater numbers? I have always wondered about that and think it's that there are less diseases in the CF as a whole than the childed. If it were for any other reason, then you can bet your ass it would be on CNN 24/7, "CF people twice as likely do die from cancer, so breeeeed, breeeeed, breeeeeed......"etc...

In fact, they are already trying to pull that stunt with saying that women who give birth are less likely to get breast cancer or cervical cancer. However, on every single documentary regarding a female cancer survivor, they ALL have kyds. If so many fewer of them even GET cancer than the CF, (like they claim) you would think they would have more CF represented, which is why I think it's bogus and a breederific tactic to denigrate us and sway fencesitters to breed in an effort to avoid cancer.

Try Disney's Cinderella for a start.

The king has SERIOUS grandbaby rabies. He doesn't care whether his son even wants to get married! Let alone have kids. On top of that, every woman who shows up at the ball is measured up as walking incubators!

Who cares if she's a horrid wife who abuses his son and treats him like crap? Just so long as she can pop a few grandkids out! ><

Soulie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Try Disney's Cinderella for a start.
>
> The king has SERIOUS grandbaby rabies. He doesn't
> care whether his son even wants to get married!
> Let alone have kids. On top of that, every woman
> who shows up at the ball is measured up as walking
> incubators!
>
> Who cares if she's a horrid wife who abuses his
> son and treats him like crap? Just so long as she
> can pop a few grandkids out! ><


I think that it's painfully obvious this is why Prince Charles married Dianna, only she was naive' enough, sheltered, young, and too caught up in the fairy tale herself to just say NO. I think this "Royal Famblee" nonsense needs to be completely done away with as it's very premise is so antiquated it's ludicrous. As long as the groundlings will line up in droves to catch a glimpse, touch a hand, and continue to idolize them they will ALWAYS have power over the masses. I think that their famblee fortune would have been spent and dried up a century ago if they didn't continue to get perks and payments from the government as well as their glowing support of the general public. Many celebrities living in The US have the same type of appeal and power and if it were not for the lower mentality minded who follow their every move as if they were famblee, pay for their shitty albums, movies, and concert tickets, then they wouldn't be living like royalty either.

> Seacreature Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > One of my all time favorites was (notice the
> > tense) Parenthood. I've decided that I've
> > probably seen that movie enough, anyway.

> > Ugh... Then there was his sister, Julie, who
> was Keanu's girlfriend. Talk about the UGLIEST
> > fucking actress! Bitch was in Goonies, too. I
> > was going through a dorky, ugly time when I
> first saw it and I remember thinking, "How in the
> hell did that hideous whore get such a gorgeous
> > boyfriend?!" And the skank gets knocked up, of
> > course, 'cause that's the entire plot.

> Not a fan of miss Samantha, huh? LOL

I think that ugly actress was Martha Plimpton.

Kim, my apologies if this is just a tad off the topic, but your comment reminded me of something.

You said: "In fact, they are already trying to pull that stunt with saying that women who give birth are less likely to get breast cancer or cervical cancer."

There are SO many women who have fallen hook,line, and sinker for this it's _ridiculous_! One of my childed friends managed to convince me to drive her to one of her pre-birth checkups. I got saddled with the oh-so-pleasant task of watching her other kids while she got checked out. Anyway, another moo was in the lobby with me and of course I started to get 20 questions. I tried to be curt enough for her to get the picture that I was not interested in conversing with her, but of course once she realized the kids playing on the floor weren't mine, I got the inevitable bingo: "So when are you having your own?" Before the sentence even got out of her mouth, I said "never". She audibly gasped and said, "But haven't you heard? If you don't have kids you will probably get breast cancer!" I said, "Yeah lady, I'm sure my tits are going to fall off tomorrow."
She looked like I'd just told her I ran down a pile of little old ladies. She put her hands up over her toddler's ears (like he was even paying attention to me) and moved to a seat on the other side of the room. It was great.

Yes, it was Martha Plimpton.

She frightens me.


allison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Seacreature Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > One of my all time favorites was (notice the
> > > tense) Parenthood. I've decided that I've
> > > probably seen that movie enough, anyway.
>
> > > Ugh... Then there was his sister, Julie, who
> > was Keanu's girlfriend. Talk about the UGLIEST
> > > fucking actress! Bitch was in Goonies, too.
> I
> > > was going through a dorky, ugly time when I
> > first saw it and I remember thinking, "How in
> the
> > hell did that hideous whore get such a gorgeous
> > > boyfriend?!" And the skank gets knocked up,
> of
> > > course, 'cause that's the entire plot.
>
> > Not a fan of miss Samantha, huh? LOL
>
> I think that ugly actress was Martha Plimpton.

kidlesskim Wrote:

> PALEASE!!!!!!!I can not IMAGINE having that type
> of life threatening, deadly, and invasive cancer,
> a painful and disfiguring surgery lined up the
> next day, and on the forefront of my brain are
> those fucking kyds. If that doesn't prove that
> giving birth causes brain damage, mental illness,
> etc.......then I don't know what would. It is
> UNNATURAL to be whining about their moomiehood
> being curtailed when they are facing death. pain,
> and disfigurement. It's probably a coping
> mechanism of some sort to get their mind OFF the
> cancer horror and re-focused, but it sure comes
> across as bizarre behavior.

Exactly, Kim. That's like the scene I mentioned in High Crimes. Instead of being grateful that she wasn't KILLED, Ashley Judd's character SCREAMS in agony over her lost zygote and practically needs restraints put on her hospital bed.

I guess this is what separates us CFs from breederbrains. We just canNOT begin to fathom the mentality behind this kind of absurd behavior. It does seem downright sick.

RatsNotBrats Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kim, my apologies if this is just a tad off the
> topic, but your comment reminded me of something.
>
> You said: "In fact, they are already trying to
> pull that stunt with saying that women who give
> birth are less likely to get breast cancer or
> cervical cancer."
>
> There are SO many women who have fallen hook,line,
> and sinker for this it's _ridiculous_! One of my
> childed friends managed to convince me to drive
> her to one of her pre-birth checkups. I got
> saddled with the oh-so-pleasant task of watching
> her other kids while she got checked out. Anyway,
> another moo was in the lobby with me and of course
> I started to get 20 questions. I tried to be curt
> enough for her to get the picture that I was not
> interested in conversing with her, but of course
> once she realized the kids playing on the floor
> weren't mine, I got the inevitable bingo: "So when
> are you having your own?" Before the sentence
> even got out of her mouth, I said "never". She
> audibly gasped and said, "But haven't you heard?
> If you don't have kids you will probably get
> breast cancer!" I said, "Yeah lady, I'm sure my
> tits are going to fall off tomorrow."


THAT'S exactly what I am talking about, it's a scare tactic. I am not certain of the motivation behind it other than it's another way to pound into the breederific, who are their target market audience, (hence it's money motivated) that breeding even prevents cancer, which is unfounded BULLSHIT. Their "studies" are highly inadequate to produce any credible results, to say the least. While my own obervations are'nt legitimate indicators of the childed vs the CF getting cancers because I simply don't know that many CF women, ALL of the women I have known to have a "female" cancer have ALL had kids! I have known SEVERAL women who have gotten breast cancer, some survivors and a few actually died, and each and every one of them had given birth to two or more kyds. I hope I don't jinx myself, but I am mid forties and never had a "female" cancer or any type of cancer, my 42 y/o childLESS sister never has had cancer, my 35 y/o CF cousin has a clean bill of health, A childLESS great aunt by marriage who is at LEAST 70 has never had cancer while her 70 y/o sister who had EIGHT kyds lost both breasts to cancer 15 years ago, a CF friend of my mothers who is nearly 70, again, CANCER free, and several others. However, off the top of my head, I have known 2 who died in their mid 30's of breast cancer and one had 4 kyds including a new baybee and the other had 3 kyds.

It's either I happen to know more childed women who happened to get cancer or CF women actually get less cancer, I am not sure. My guess is that it's the luck of the draw who gets cancer and who doesn't and has absolutely nothing to do with childed vs CF. These "studies" do nothing but provide false senses of security and therefore perpetuate the cycle of childed women perhaps not seeking treatment as soon because of it. I greatly resent this bullshit misinformation which is concocted to grease the breeder wheel of prolification, like it needs any grease.

RatsNotBrats Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've got one: anyone remember that Rebecca De
> Mornay movie, The Hand that Rocks the Cradle?
>
> Rebecca's character was the psycho-wannabe-moo
> whose ultimate goal was to take over the role of
> mom for another woman's kids. Her husband was a
> perverted gynecologist who got his jollies groping
> his female patients, and one of his patients
> presses charges. When the gyno realizes he'll
> have to go to court and that his life is pretty
> much kaput after this, he shoots himself.
> Rebecca's character is so distraught that she
> miscarries. After that, she poses as a nanny so
> she can gain access to the mom who she feels was
> responsible for her husband and baby's death.
> She spends her time being buddy-buddy with the
> other woman's daughter, trying to win her trust
> and affection, and doing psycho moo things like
> breast pumping and feeding the other woman's
> infant. She spouts corny, breederific lines such
> as: "When your baby is hungry it's my breast that
> feeds him!" and other such drivel.

I am very sorry to be sharing same name with that breeder wench. (Call me "Becca" instead!)

I bet none of that above actually happen in RL like a pervert doing himself in once he's caught, a woman losing her spawn if something happened to her perverted hubby, and hungering after another woman's spawn enough to actually murder. Let alone bare herself to a strange baby, too. Talk about baybee rabies!!!

Wonder what she looks like now? She'd be about 36 probably. I will check it out.

I too have known several women with breast cancer, and all of them had kids. You've probably heard about the idea that never having bred MAY increase your chances of getting breast cancer because during the nine months of pregnancy, your boobs aren't being bombarded with estrogen like they are when you are menstruating each and every month. Well, like you say, why do all these MOMS end up with cancer? So far, we haven't seen evidence of this in our daily lives, so it ends up looking very much like a scare tactic on the part of The Scripters.

As for cervical cancer, it's been proven to be a sexually transmitted disease, caused by certain strains of human papillomavirus, so the idea of breeding protecting you from it is unmitigated bullshit. In fact, that's a new one to me. What will they come up with next, that repugnancy protects you from toenail fungus??