http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/8/20/were-child-free-not-childless.html
I ran across this article the other day and thought it was a basic informative type article that was written by a childfree editor of US News. I saw nothing particularly controversial, abrasive, or accusatory about it, but rather it was just one writer's opinion. Then I glanced through some of the reader comments and was appalled and taken aback at some of the downright RUDE and OBNOXIOUS comments. These people clearly hate the childfree and I found some of their comments to be aggressive and hate filled. For the life of me, I can't understand WHY so many people give a damn if other people voluntarilty reproduce or not, but they do and many take it personally. You can click on the link above for the entire article and all 38 comments, but I am going to list excerpts from some of the comments that I found especially offensive.
Well, childless does mean without children. The way you are stating it, you're making it sound as though children are a burden and people wish to be free of them...Wow. It almost sounds as though you have a contempt for humanity. Also, you better hope we start accepting more immigrants and they in turn have more children. Favorite programs that you support, such as Medicare and Social Security, depend upon having more people paying in than people taking out..."
"... There seems to be much more non-heterosexual behavior than there was. Many young men/women may never have enough interaction to date, have sex, marry(maybe in that order, maybe not). Many are children of divorce so they are afraid to committ. After all the pill was well established 30 years ago so you can reasonably say that significant decreased levels of childlessness correspond to decreased levels of procreational sex"
(blame it on gay people, divorce, the pill? Why can't it be that some people JUST don't want kyds?)
"...You are ridiculous. Your obvious insecurity with your childlessness and resultant defensiveness come through in every line of your seemingly elitist rant. I use the term "seemingly" because a lack of understanding of the common meaning of words and a hysterical attachment of personal baggage to the use of those words are hardly representative of behavior by genuine intellectual elites.
This comes from a humble, male public school teacher who is so bored with the self-proclaimed elites of the media, male or female, who need to go back to some English Language basics and read something more than each other. Your incestuous intellectuality is so provincial..."
d "...You dishonor your parents, and all your ancestors, by placing in jeopardy the legacy of generations whose culmination you are--and whose final end will be in you because you selfishly denied them the opportunity to continue their existence through the DNA they bequeathed to you. You are the worst kind of spendthrift wastrel, squandering not merely an inheritance of money, but an inheritance of all that you ancestors meant and all that they accomplished. Ultimately, on earth we are nothing more than what life we live behind. You have chosen to live nothing behind, and you have betrayed all who gave you breath....
...The economic value of women who bear and raise children is literally incalculable, is absolutely essential to the continuation of human life...
Friedan claimed that it was the housewife who was the "parasite," but in fact it is the non-child-bearing-and-rearing woman who is a parasite, feeding upon the millennia of human development and evolution while doing her best to bring it to a complete stop.
...Those who follow her extinguish themselves, and endanger the rest of us. They are stupid, destructive and dangerous, worse than morons playing with matches in a field of hay that surrounds the wooden house in which we all live...."