There have also been reported cases of superintendents encouraging certain kids to
stay home on mandatory test days, so as to not lower the scores of their school.
Schools seem to have the attitude that they don't have to fix their problems, just wait long enough and someone else can deal with it. Elementary school kids having a tough time with reading? Not a problem...they can offer extra tutoring in middle school. Weak middle school math program? Hey, they'll deal with it in high school. Kids can't read critically by the end of high school? That's what college is for.
As part of my mandated teacher inservice training, I had to sit through countless day-long conferences on all things educational. One year in particular, we had a presentation by a special ed mother who thought it was perfectly reasonable for schools to give her son (and all other special ed kids) all the time in the world to complete a given task, complete with repeating the instructions as many times as needed, and allowing kids to be late to school and skip altogether without penalty because
"schools prepare kids for working life, and that's what employers would do." She said this with a straight face, too. Personally, I do not know a single employer in the private sector who would tolerate this behavior from an employee if they were even remotely interested in turning a profit.
Before I was a math teacher I worked in private industry as a design draftsman, so my perspective of the working world was not completely shaped by educational bureaucracy. One of the things that always bugged me in listening to educators come up with ways to "help" kids always seemed like completely misguided efforts. The big push for having kids take more high school math classes was that favorite of educational phrases, "but math is a gatekeeper." Basically, employers and colleges were sorting applications by how many high school math courses a person had taken, to thin the applicant pool. So administrators thought they could magically level the playing field and empower all students by having everyone take three years of high school math. Well, of course that wasn't successful because they were putting kids into courses they couldn't ever do well in, so even for the kids that muddled through, the applicant pool was
simply thinned by a different criteria, but these policy geniuses could never seem to figure that out. Of course, they now also had the additional problem of a backlog of kids who couldn't pass those extra courses and weren't eligible to graduate, so administrators came up with a new trick--take a one year course and slow it down so that it lasted for two years, and tack on a year at the beginning, and call it a "Pre" course, like Pre-Algebra. Right number of credits, one year of material spread into two or even three. This was so ridiculous to me, that I got into a discussion with my building principal and asked her, point blank, if we were now going to let kids graduate with a math major for essentially completing a freshman Algebra course.
So, CrabCake, I've seen the system from the inside, and it is at least as horrifying as you describe.