This is outrageous. A court has ruled that a man with autism, who has impaired cognition and "cannot understand that a woman's consent is relevant in sexual situations, nor that attempting sex without consent is likely to be a criminal offense" has a "fundamental right to sex" so his care plan cannot prevent him from pursuing sexual relationships. He is classed as being a "moderate risk of sexual offending to women, particularly to those who are vulnerable" but the care plan was imposed in the first place due to his historic behavior toward women which "lacked appropriate social inhibition."
If that doesn't sum up rape culture in a nutshell. A vulnerable woman's right to not be raped ranks below a man's "right" to sex. And presumably the rest of us are just supposed to shut up and let people like this molest us in public? Because if he ever does assault someone, he'll no doubt get off on diminished responsibility. Oh, and the judge mentioned sexuality in the context of reproduction, as if the fact that bodies "want" to breed is supposed to justify any of this.