Reaction to magazine titleech cover

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding

It appears that we are not the only ones who do not like the magazine cover featuring the bare boob and titleech.

I am savoring every moment of the breeder vs. breeder (non-milkers vs. titnazis) battle yet to rage!

Yuck! Breastfeeding wouldn't even be an issue if these womben didn't insist on making spectacles of themselves. I consider it to be titstalking when they choose the most crowded places to feed their loaves. If you look, and a lot of times, moo is so in your face about it, you can't help but see everything, then your a perv. But if you show no interest, or God forbid, appear disgusted, then your a hateful asshole. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it acceptable to do in public.

That magazine cover is just gross, tasteless, and crude. The same goes for the Vanity Fair covers with naked preggos on them. Some things aren't meant to be seen by everyone.

A. it's a cover for a parenting magazine, they can put whatever the hell they want on it for all I care, I'm not going to read it.

B. For chrissakes, it's a freaking BOOB. It's not like they're showing a baby clawing it's way out of some moos crotch, or the activity that produced that sprog. Most women have boobs, so it's not like it's some bizarre thing no one's seen before.

C. These "parents" who object to a cover with about as much breast as you'd see at any awards show, um, well, have fun with those teenage years and seeing your kids become parents at the age of 13 because you can't deal with anything that might possibly be even remotely associated with sex.

D. Damn, if that much boob is so shocking, how the hell did these people become parents in the first place?

Feh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A. it's a cover for a parenting magazine, they can
> put whatever the hell they want on it for all I
> care, I'm not going to read it.

Amen!
This is about the only time I would think it would be appropritate to show what BFing looks like...on a PARENTING magizine; or in the case of showing how to use a breast pump; on the box showing instructions on how to use one (I was stocking baby shit all day at my new job at a chain department store because that's the biggest department there and my boss wanted someone who acually WORKS).
I personally don't see the big deal about breasts in general. It's the whole hypocrisy thing that pisses me off when it comes to women BFing in public. They'll want people to "deal with it" when they pull out their saggy, nasty, streached-out tits. But if someone like me wanted to walk topless revealing her perfect (but small) tits, then she would be offended.

Fattie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Feh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A. it's a cover for a parenting magazine,
> they can
> > put whatever the hell they want on it for all
> I
> > care, I'm not going to read it.
>
> Amen!
> This is about the only time I would think it would
> be appropritate to show what BFing looks like...on
> a PARENTING magizine; or in the case of showing
> how to use a breast pump; on the box showing
> instructions on how to use one (I was stocking
> baby shit all day at my new job at a chain
> department store because that's the biggest
> department there and my boss wanted someone who
> acually WORKS).
> I personally don't see the big deal about breasts
> in general. It's the whole hypocrisy thing that
> pisses me off when it comes to women BFing in
> public. They'll want people to "deal with it"
> when they pull out their saggy, nasty,
> streached-out tits. But if someone like me wanted
> to walk topless revealing her perfect (but small)
> tits, then she would be offended.


Amen.

---

lab mom

I don't know why these moos are crying foul over the breastfeeding cover...since most of them demand to lift their shirts and to the same in public. I nearly laughed when one moo griped how her husband was so offended and felt uncomfortable over seenig the magazine cover on the table at home. I bet Hubby did not feel "uncomfortable" during his pre-marriage days of sex with women and getting a look at their breasts as well as doing other things. I always have to wonder when a man claims that anything seems sexual to them is considered offensive. Many men feel that their wives' bodies belong to them and get jealous if the women are breastfeeding....feeling they are being left out. Well, these men should not have made these women into moos!

Exactly, or they should have used protection, or not have anything to do with moo, or 'kept it in their pants.'

---

lab mom

Why do people always have to mention they have perfect bodies, or body parts, anyway? Is it a superiority thing? I'm just wondering.

Anything is perfect next to a stretched out sagging boob.

Um, so why are some parents offended by things they are doing themselves? And why is the magazine cover worse than shameless Moos whipping out their tits in public to feed their screaming leeches? I'll never understand breeder logic. And I doubt that Moo's husband was offended by a swollen milk bag considering that's all he would have to look at anyway, unless he was smart and pulled out his stash of Hustlers when he had some time to himself.

Honestly, I don't give a crap what appears on the covers of parenting magazines. For all I care, they can show pictures of a woman receiving an episiotomy. I'm not going to pick up a parenting book and read it anyway. Still it's fun to see breeders bickering with one another.

Cambion, like you, I don't care what is on a parenting magazine cover or any other magazine cover. The Mommy Wars do get pretty vicious...much worse than trolls hassling the childfree.

This is so stupid. OK, let me see if I get this straight, moos: when YOU do it, it's the greatest fucking thing and perfectly natural and yadda yadda yadda. But when someone ELSE does it, it's gross? Make up your stupid minds!

And yeah, like duh was seriously "offended". I bet he was getting off on it and the bitch got jealous.

What the hell is that last post?

Wow, if the lactating moos are so obsessed with showing their tits, they would have LOVED Sturgis. There were tits everywhere. Everyone flashing for those cheesy metallic beads. And cops handing out tickets by the dozens for it.

You can bet your sweet ass that if a lactating moo saw this, she'd be mortified. But it's OK when they do it.

KFLL, women do the same in New Orleans during Mardis Gras -- flashing their t*ts to any nasty jerk for plastic beads. They love it when the press is their taping them as they pull their tops up. Their mums must be so proud of their daughters...

Wow I think the creepiest boob shot I saw was from a link on here about BFing. All these moos had pictures of tot and tit but the worst one had a moo (and I use that word strongly)with her udders dangling down like a cow and her tot playing with them while gazing at the camera. It really looked more like fucking porn then some moo and toadler moment. Nasty.

Mrs. Ogre Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anything is perfect next to a stretched out
> sagging boob.

AMEN!!!!

---

lab mom