"What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 26, 2013 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 26, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 5,716 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 26, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,437 |
Quote
Again, being young and naive and thoroughly exhausted from all the issues we were having with our newborn daughter's health, we gave in, and my husband had the procedure done.
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 26, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 4,176 |
Anonymous User
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 26, 2013 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 26, 2013 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,788 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 538 |
Quote
yurble
Quote
Again, being young and naive and thoroughly exhausted from all the issues we were having with our newborn daughter's health, we gave in, and my husband had the procedure done.
I think it's pretty unbelievable when you try to play the "young and naive" card when you're at least 28 years old (15 years getting on the pill, took it for 6 years, married for 7). It seems to be her perpetual state (I think she means "clueless" not "naive"), given that she's still like that in the next paragraph. When will she grow up and start taking responsibility for her choices instead of claiming others coerced her? Oh, right, never: she's in a perpetual state of childhood in her twisted relationship with her daddy God.
Anonymous User
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,437 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,437 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 672 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,469 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 2,212 |
Quote
stillwaters
Oh, good lord what a whiner! It sounds like she has had a defective loaf-maker from the start, but she's attempting to blame ebil science-y doctors for introducing Satan to her cooter.
Different BC pills work differently from each other. If you don't like the pill you're on, go back to the doctor and get try a different Rx. But this bimbo didn't know that because it sounds like she works terribly hard to not know anything about anything. She probably gets off on being a constant victim.
Also note how ms. fundy blames her marriage problems on her mood swings. While I have no doubt she was/is completely insufferable to live with, this just underscores how fundies expect women to be constant and happy servants to their men. My husband knows that there are mood swings when PMS comes around. He deals with it. While I'm sure it's not fun for him to live with, it's not fun for me either, and it's certainly nothing I choose to bring upon him or myself. Sometimes living with a woman means putting up with women hormones. Sometimes living with a man means dealing with man hormones, too. I'm not going to divorce my husband because he's not happy and accommodating all the time. And if he suddenly became a constant bitch to be around I'd suggest he go to a doctor, not resent him for being ill or having his hormones out of whack.
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,437 |
Quote
kidlesskim
Okie Dokie then. Like I mentioned in my commentary above, I looked up this, "Humanae Vitae" speech Fundie-Freida spoke of and learned it is Latin for, "Of Human Life" and was the title of a religious text( papal letter) written by Pope Paul VI and issued on 25 July 1968. It's subtitle was, "On the Regulation of Birth". It basically upholds the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church regarding married love, responsible parenthood, and the continued rejection of most forms of birth control. It says a lot of shit, of course, but below is what it says specifically which applies to our Fundie Friend and her cooter woes:
From the Pope's Papal Piehole
"...Every action specifically intended to prevent procreation is forbidden, except in medically necessary circumstances. Therapeutic means necessary to cure diseases are exempted, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result, but only if infertility is not directly intended. This includes both chemical and barrier methods of contraception. All these are held to directly contradict the "moral order which was established by God". Abortion, even for therapeutic reasons, is absolutely forbidden, as is sterilization, even if temporary. Therapeutic means which induce infertility are allowed (e.g., hysterectomy), if they are not specifically intended to cause infertility (e.g., the uterus is cancerous, so the preservation of life is intended). Natural family planning methods (abstaining from intercourse during certain parts of the menstrual cycle) are allowed, since they take advantage of "a faculty provided by nature...."
SO, her having taken birth control pills to cure her menstrual "diseases", directly and indirectly, and her husband getting snipped to avoid inpigness that may result in her death, and so is medically necessary for the preservation of life , are "okay" and "approved" by the pope himself who wrote the speech on it!!! Therefore, unless she's lying about her reason for having taken the birth control pills and/or about the true reason her husband got fixed, then WHAT is her problem? Do these people not even READ what it is they "believe" in and practice as a way of life? I'd suspect not since I have rarely met any church going Christians who possess even the slightest knowledge of The Holy Bible, let alone any of their own church-denomination doctrines!
This shit right here is one of the primary reasons I detest fundamentalists because they don't even know what it is they "believe in", don't appear to have even glanced over documents they uphold as sacred, yet continue on blabbering non-stop about it like this stupid woman.The vast ignorance, lack of basic common sense, unfounded sanctimonious attitudes, pious demeanor, and pure idiocy of religious fundamentalists is mind boggling to me and frustrating.:headbrick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanae_Vitae
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Quote
yurble
Quote
kidlesskim
Okie Dokie then. Like I mentioned in my commentary above, I looked up this, "Humanae Vitae" speech Fundie-Freida spoke of and learned it is Latin for, "Of Human Life" and was the title of a religious text( papal letter) written by Pope Paul VI and issued on 25 July 1968. It's subtitle was, "On the Regulation of Birth". It basically upholds the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church regarding married love, responsible parenthood, and the continued rejection of most forms of birth control. It says a lot of shit, of course, but below is what it says specifically which applies to our Fundie Friend and her cooter woes:
From the Pope's Papal Piehole
"...Every action specifically intended to prevent procreation is forbidden, except in medically necessary circumstances. Therapeutic means necessary to cure diseases are exempted, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result, but only if infertility is not directly intended. This includes both chemical and barrier methods of contraception. All these are held to directly contradict the "moral order which was established by God". Abortion, even for therapeutic reasons, is absolutely forbidden, as is sterilization, even if temporary. Therapeutic means which induce infertility are allowed (e.g., hysterectomy), if they are not specifically intended to cause infertility (e.g., the uterus is cancerous, so the preservation of life is intended). Natural family planning methods (abstaining from intercourse during certain parts of the menstrual cycle) are allowed, since they take advantage of "a faculty provided by nature...."
SO, her having taken birth control pills to cure her menstrual "diseases", directly and indirectly, and her husband getting snipped to avoid inpigness that may result in her death, and so is medically necessary for the preservation of life , are "okay" and "approved" by the pope himself who wrote the speech on it!!! Therefore, unless she's lying about her reason for having taken the birth control pills and/or about the true reason her husband got fixed, then WHAT is her problem? Do these people not even READ what it is they "believe" in and practice as a way of life? I'd suspect not since I have rarely met any church going Christians who possess even the slightest knowledge of The Holy Bible, let alone any of their own church-denomination doctrines!
This shit right here is one of the primary reasons I detest fundamentalists because they don't even know what it is they "believe in", don't appear to have even glanced over documents they uphold as sacred, yet continue on blabbering non-stop about it like this stupid woman.The vast ignorance, lack of basic common sense, unfounded sanctimonious attitudes, pious demeanor, and pure idiocy of religious fundamentalists is mind boggling to me and frustrating.:headbrick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanae_Vitae
I read it as her pills were fine but the vasectomy wasn't, so I wonder why she's saving her wrath for the pills. The pills were clearly "therapeutic means necessary to cure diseases" whereas sterilization seems to be forbidden even for therapeutic reasons relating to fertility (but not for therapeutic reasons unrelated to fertility). At any rate, her husband wasn't the one who was sick.
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,788 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 721 |
Anonymous User
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 27, 2013 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 28, 2013 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Quote
skyeyes
Roman Catholics, no matter how intensely they believe and practice their religion, are not "fundamentalists." In the Christian world, "fundamentalist" refers to a certain flavor of Protestantism that regards the Bible as inerrant. I know it's convenient shorthand to refer to all True Believers as "fundamentalists," but it's not accurate. The writer - a particularly annoying RCTB (Roman Catholic True Believer) - is a *Catholic*, not a fundamentalist.
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 28, 2013 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 75 |
Re: "What Almost Destroyed Our Marriage" (So Says a Fundie Blogger):rolleyes2 July 30, 2013 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,149 |