In the 1970s, the late pediatrician Dr. Benjamin Feingold publicized his discovery of links between artificial colors (dyes) and artificial flavors in food and the dramatic rise in rates of hyperactivity in children that was becoming obvious then. As an example of his findings, he cited a case where a young child quickly became hyper after chewing
one stick of red-colored chewing gum. I myself have witnessed young children climbing the walls after being given Kool-Aid, which is nothing
but a package of artificial coloring and flavoring that you add sugar water to. Ugh.
He also found links between hyperactivity and chemicals related to salicylic acid that occur naturally in many foods; examples were most citrus fruits except grapefruit. For these foods he generally suggested that parents cautiously put them back in the diet one at a time after cutting out all the artificial stuff referred to above.
His research led to the "Feingold diet", which he said seemed to help about half of the children who had been diagnosed as hyperactive (today more formally known as ADHD), and he avoided making extravagant claims. When he died in the early 1980s, he was working on the idea that undiagnosed food allergies might be a cause of some of the other behavioral problems in children.
Dr. Feingold's point was this: children's biosystems are developing, and loading them with artificial chemicals in foods was having effects on those systems that nobody understood. (Note the recent publicity over lung disease in adults linked to artificial butter flavoring in microwave popcorn. That's just a small example of what we didn't know. At the company in New Jersey where many of these flavorings are made, employees in the manufacturing area often have to wear full "moonsuits" around those chemicals—and we happily eat that same dreck added to what we consume.)
Historically, the doctor noted, people ate more natural foods—not the highly overprocessed crap they eat today, especially as given to children by pahrents who can't be bothered to prepare a healthy meal for their sprogs. A diagnosis of hyperactivity was rare before the 1960s.
Changes in lifestyle play an obvious role as well, of course, as people including kyds became more sedentary in the 1970s. Also, schools began cutting out recess and unstructured recreation time, adding to the problem.
Many parents tried the Feingold diet with generally good success, but psychologists and others with a vested interest in pushing drugs such as Ritalin and Adderal harshly criticized Feingold and the notion that a dietary change could "solve" hyperactivity. In the meantime, the problem has gotten far worse as feeding chyldren junk has become even more the norm. It isn't unusual in my area to see welfare pahrents using food stamps to buy snack and junk food for their sprogs.
Feingold said that
modest sugar consumption was not a cause of behavior problems in children. I would submit that today he would be appalled at the sheer levels of sugar consumption in today's youth, not just in junk foods, but also in beverages including caffeine-laden sodas and energy drinks. When I was growing up, a soda was an
occasional treat; now I often see pahrents give infants Pepsi or Coke in baby bottles. And not the decaf version, either. As one critic said, pahrents need to think of soft drinks as liquid candy.
According to figures published in one of the newspapers I get, a
single 12-ounce can of regular soda has the entire maximum daily dose of caffeine for a 12-year-old chyld. What about these kyds whose parents let them drink several cans a day? Again, I suspect that Dr. Feingold would have had a few things to say about that. He probably also would have expressed alarm at pahrents taking the sprogs to Starbucks for a sugar-, fat-, and caffeine-filled jug of coffee.
And we cannot figure out why the little turds are obese, hyper, and can't pay attention? Duh...