Waaahh! Facebook's removal of birf pictures is censoring women!:rolleyes2

Warning: gross naked moo/birth/loaf images - graphic!

Link

Lowing article about how Facebook shouldn't censor graphic pictures of childbirth in the way they do other forms of nudity, because it's natcheral and beautiful and we're disempowering women by not showing them these images.

FeMOOnism at its most idiotic. These exact people who think shitting a loaf=being feminist would be the same ones barking at the moon if there was a picture of, say, a bloke's man-sack, to raise awareness of testicular cancer. Predictably, there is the usual lowing about young women showing their boobs online (pre-loaf and pre-beefing, of course) never being censored, but nobody wants to see images of real women.

I do want to see images of real people online, but I'd prefer they didn't have their boobs or genitalia hanging out, in any context. There are some things that just should be kept fucking private. I'm all for Facebook applying the no nudity policy across the board, I don't really want to see any stranger nudity (or even the majority of my friends and family, thanks) but the idea that we should make an exception for loafing is just ludicrous.

Having a shit is natural, but that doesn't mean I want to post it on social media.

Keep your bodily functions to yourselves, disgusting moos.

Nudity doesn't bother me at all. However, boobs either are sexual or they're not. They're not any less sexual because there's a crotch dumpling attached to them. As if moos don't get enough special treatment.

I don't have low self-esteem. That's a mistake. I have low esteem for everyone else.
-Daria

If the mommies don't like FakeBook's policies, they are free to post their images to another social networking site. Or, better yet, start their own site, and permit whatever they want within the bounds of the law.

But this isn't about FakeBook and it isn't about childbirth. This is about these mommies insatiable need to attention whore.

I had a fakebook moo encounter too today. Seems some lowlife posted a nonsense ad for a Thanksgiving dinner in the local buy/sell/trade. Accompanied by a shot of some guys balls. I didn't see the ad, but some moo ran to the fakebook crime watch group for the county asking for a cop to find this guy and charge him with indecent exposure, and calling the poster a child predator, because won't someone please think of the children in the trade group?

I chimed in to ask the moo how long she had been on the internet if this was her first response to seeing balls. I told her the admins (they had removed it within 10 minutes) and fakebook would take care of something so trivial, not the local police. I then reminded her that children had no business in a trade group, trying to set up meets with random strangers from the internet, and I had no desire to deal with them because chances are, moo would come screaming about how I ripped bratlee off.

To top it all off, I reminded her that responsible parenting was the first step in preventing children from viewing pornographic materials.

The whole post was deleted before it could evolve into a real shouting match.
The unfunny thing is, I've seen this same hysterical moo discussing circumcision and breastfeeding on buy/sell/trade. WTF?

Naked tits and cunts are naked tits and cunts no matter what they are doing. If they post that shit then I can post a naked picture of myself deadlifting 150 pounds. And I know which picture I would find empowering.

Well, posting their creepy photos to a moo group just wouldn't be enough for them. They actually want to inflict their saggy milk bags and cavernous vagina-buttholes on folks that don't want to see them.

Of course, we all know there is nothing "feminist" about following the lifescript and reducing oneself to breeding stock. Feminism is suppose to be, in part, breaking out of those paternalistic roles that women had been shoved into for centuries. There's nothing brave, nor remarkable about breeding whatsoever.

I SHOULDN'T HAVE CLICKED THE LINK! ::brbl In the second picture, the loaf looks like it's about to drown. Empowering indeed.

It's a fallacy to say that "natural" = shouldn't be kept private. Fucking is natural too but when people post pictures of it online, it's porn. And if anyone got away with posting that on FB you know these moos would be the first to low about how it will affect the chyyyyyyldruuuun.

FB can prohibit whatever pictures they want. If Moolli Hill wants to post her stretched-out twat pics online she can start a website called Cuntbook and all the moos can post their OMG sooper speshul byrfin' photos there.

Feminism isnt about women simply grunting out brats. Its about being equal. Being equal implies SOME sort of dignity, unlike living on your back. I would love to post pictures of women giving birth and then an oddly similar picture of an animal doing the same thing. I wonder how pissed they would be then. If you want to be an animal, be an animal. But animals and humans dont necessarily mean getting the same treatment, so pick your social poisons now so later generations get to choke on it later.

Quote
rudeawakening
If Moolli Hill wants to post her stretched-out twat pics online she can start a website called Cuntbook and all the moos can post their OMG sooper speshul byrfin' photos there.

Can we mandate Moos to use this site and leave the rest of the social media sites for people who don't want to post such utter grimness?

Whilst I totally agree with Facebook and the last thing I EVER want to see on my feed is birfin' pictures, I do find it hypocritical that Facebook STILL doesn't take such a hard line against other types of graphic imagery...even now they have finally agreed that rape is not a "joke" there is still far too many images of violence against women on the site. As well as cruelty to animals, ISIS beheading videos, etc. All sorts of really nasty shit that should not be there. 4Chan already exists and I avoid that site for a reason.

All of that shit needs to be removed, including cunts n runts pictures. I appreciate Facebook must be hard to police because of it's size, but they are not making a proper effort. They need more people working for them who deal with this sort of stuff. They might be a business but they are such a massive one that they have a social duty to do so.

Quote
catharsist
I would love to post pictures of women giving birth and then an oddly similar picture of an animal doing the same thing.

There are types of frog (I think they may be extinct now but recently so and there are pictures) called gastric brooding frogs. They ate their eggs, and the tadpoles hatched and grew in their stomachs. When ready they would burp out baby frogs. You should post those. Not only would it be hilarious but it's far cuter than the regular way of birthing. It's like a little froggie Russian doll

Froggy Russian doll? That literally makes my day.