Kim, the relative I speak of here (a different one that the preg one i've talked about before) I had only met 3 times when she was a little girl. Her mother was training her in a life of become a welfare recipient and credit card fraudster.
Not only that, but the girl was involved with her mother in attempting to deceive me on many occaisons.
In other words, there was not even a hint of love there, just a GIMMMMEEEEEE.
So trust me when I say, I did not feel that I "owed" anything to her or her mother. What I did feel was an obligation.
I'm pretty certain my plan of help for this girl was a mere fraction of what you and the other cf folk here are now paying out in taxes to continue to support her lifestlye and her mother's lifestyle.
BTW, remember my preggo 21 year old relative? She just had her loaf not to long ago and all signed up with welfare and all? Well guess what, she hasn't been given depo provera or sterilized yet. Had there been no "social contract" to thwart what the family thinks is best for her, long term birth control or sterilization, we wouldn't have to be looking forward to more babies come the next year or two, which is exactly what is going to happen. My help would have been contingent upon depo provera or sterilization.
I don't owe either of the above relatives anything. Neither one is very nice to me. But I would have liked it better and they would have better help and a better life and maybe become better people had there not been an entitlement system to get in my way.
Why listen to nowhiggers when the taxpayer will just let you do whatever the fuck you want and keep rewarding you for being a goddamned irresponsible breeder and scammer?
I don't want to pay for Obama's relatives in Kenya. That's Obama's responsibility.
kidlesskim Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> nowhiggers,
>
> I am glad that you are posting your opinions
> because quite frankly, I am so embittered with
> some issues regarding famblee (distant in
> relationship AND geographically) who have tried to
> sink their paws into what I consider my modest
> earnings that I can really be narrow minded and
> quick to form opinions on this type of thing
> without knowing the facts. I think you are correct
> in that if he or his political groups, can be
> "for" throwing money away to terd worlders, then
> he can at LEAST make sure that his granny in a hut
> gets her needs met first. I think now that I was
> too harsh in my initial reaction and that granny
> at least deserves a decent home, food, and care
> befitting her grandson's position.
>
> I still wonder though, did Obama not know his
> grandmother was alive? He has had the means to
> check out his dead biological father's family and
> contact them if he had wanted. I can't help but
> think that he was angry that his dad didn't have
> any role in his life at all and he had every
> opportunity as Obama was 21 or so years old before
> he died. This is a sticky situation, to say the
> least. It could also be political murder if Obama
> doesn't play his cards right.