Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay June 16, 2018 | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 651 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay June 17, 2018 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 344 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay June 17, 2018 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,735 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay June 17, 2018 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,713 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 10, 2018 | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 651 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 10, 2018 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,835 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 10, 2018 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 344 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 10, 2018 | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 651 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 12, 2018 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,713 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 12, 2018 | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 651 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 13, 2018 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,367 |
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 16, 2018 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,713 |
Quote
kman
If you read the rest of the story, several people are still wringing their hands about whether the statue was really worth the claimed amount and why it was unsecured. Breeders... The story doesn't mention whether the family will be liable to the city for the $25,000 deductible. I hope moo and duh are.
Re: Kid ruins artwork statue and Moo doesn't want to pay July 27, 2018 | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 651 |
Quote
kman
The family's insurance company paid:
https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article214450329.html [9 July 2018]
"Overland Park has been reimbursed for the damage that a 5-year-old caused to a $132,000 sculpture on sale at a community center, city officials say.
"The city received a check for $107,000 from the insurance company of the boy’s family, city spokesman Sean Reilly told The Star. That check reimbursed the city for all but the $25,000 deductible in the city's insurance policy."
If you read the rest of the story, several people are still wringing their hands about whether the statue was really worth the claimed amount and why it was unsecured. Breeders... The story doesn't mention whether the family will be liable to the city for the $25,000 deductible. I hope moo and duh are.