I have seen and been involved with some of the troll wars that have/are gone/going on here on bratfree.
My personal opinion is to ignore these people. They have succumbed to the stockholm syndrome and/or have a severe case of crab in the bucket-itis. You cannot deter them with facts, opinions or anything of any intellectual value.
Furthermore (and I may add to this in the future) the sappy arguments trolls use just bolster my opinion that they are devoid of rational deductive reasoning. They cannot infer anything from what is said: they lack the ability to read between the lines. They are also famous for 'getting things wrong' totally and completely as well.
Their bingo argument (which sends us over the proverbial edge) is that we are jealous and cannot sprogg and just rant here for that reason. This reasoning is coloured by their own rationale which is rooted in their reproductive organs which is seemingly what they use to think with. Coloured: since we are jealous, therefore our anger and angst comes from this. Nothing could be further from the truth. We do not like kids. Some of us realize that as such (and many times for other reasons) we would NOT make good parents. To bring a child into a household with parent(s) who did NOT want kids, who did NOT like kids would be tantamount to shooting at dynamite. I do not want to wreck the life of a child, that is completely and totally unfair. I would NOT make a good parent in any way, shape, or form. Therefore I am smart enough to not have kids. I have thought about it from time to time. Most of us have: we usually just come to the same conclusion, we do not want kids.
To peg murders, kidnappings, etc of children to the sole province of the childfree is your typical breeder kneejerk reaction. Again, I point to my earlier comment, 'do not confuse breeders with facts'. The vast majority of the stories we read, the child dies at the hands of their parent(s), boyfriend, girlfriend either through deliberate action or deliberate (or not) ignorance or so called forgetfulness (child left to bake in a car for example). How many of these so called 'accidents' are not, only these perpetrators know. The 'system' seems to be unwilling to grill these 'grieving' parent(s).
What we seem to regard as 'quaint' tradition has, over my years of observation, been developed to primarily insure a child will have the best possible chance (and I do mean chance) at succeeding in life. From being adequately fed, housed, and clothed, to an ample education, a child is best served by an intact family. In their insane, greedy rush of "I want I want I want" baby rabies, even this simple dictum is cast aside to serve the mommies obsession with having her very own child to destroy. Men are not needed in her mind (although statistics and studies do say otherwise: even daycare is destructive), only the almighty child. This drifts into 'what is truly in the best interest of the child'. I repeat: the best interest of a child is served by an intact family, with a mom & dad. So, for you trolls who pat yourselves on the back that you have achieved superior status by merely producing your very own child (probably without benefit of marriage) think (if you can): are you truly behaving in the best interest of a child or just serving your own selfish whims. ....... Those of us who do not want our own kids would probably kill someone if they caught them injuring a child.
Conclusion: we are smart enough not to have children. You trolls: why do you have children. I doubt you can answer the question.
This will be subject to editing as I think of additional points.
two cents ¢¢
CERTIFIED HOSEHEAD!!!
people (especially women) do not give ONE DAMN about what they inflict on children and I defy anyone to prove me wrong
Dysfunctional relationships almost always have a child. The more dysfunctional, the more children.
The selfish wants of adults outweigh the needs of the child.
Some mistakes cannot be fixed, but some mistakes can be 'fixed'.
People who say they sleep like a baby usually don't have one. Leo J. Burke
Adoption agencies have strict criteria (usually). Breeders, whose combined IQ's would barely hit triple digits, have none.