Sherz - This is an article from my local newspaper. I do agree with you on the entitlement issue, but I have always believed that parents should pay more, if not ALL for educating their own children, including their transportation. I'll never understand why people without children are 'footing the bill.'
School busing fees nixed, again
By David Krongard, Community Reporter 5/5/2006
Marlborough – Thanks in large part to the substantial costs associated with implementation, school officials have again decided against charging students a transportation fee.
Discussed at length during several recent School Committee meetings, a transportation fee, if appropriately applied, could require a six-figure investment.
At a meeting of the Marlborough School Committee held last month, Assistant Superintendent James R. Jolicoeur told his colleagues that he believes it is too late to adequately implement the fees for next school year.
Citing the necessity for enhanced GIS mapping software, at a possible cost of more than $15,000, and ample time for communication with parents, Jolicoeur said that the district is simply not ready. Ultimately, his colleagues concurred.
The costly but necessary mapping software is essential to measure the actual distance from each neighborhood bus stop to the city's various schools. The precise mileage is necessary to be in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Education.
In addition to the cost of purchasing, installing and maintaining the GIS mapping software, Jolicoeur noted that the district would also have to invest a sizable amount of money in safety precautions necessary with a larger percentage of the student body walking to school. Increasing the amount of money paid to local crossing guards and other preventative measures could cost upwards of $50,000.
School officials also cited the need to hire an administrative aide if such a fee structure were implemented to assist with billing and collections.
The School Committee will continue to discuss the feasibility of such fees and even the possibility of implementing a transportation fee halfway through next school year.
Superintendent Rose Marie Boniface, set to retire next fall, told her fellow committee members other local districts that have successfully implemented transportation fees charge between $1 and $2 per day. Although such a fee structure could bring in a substantial amount of money, the Boniface cautioned against the proposal.
Also, Boniface warned the committee of the high default rate on such fees. According to Boniface, there's a 13 percent default rate currently with respect to kindergarten tuition and the collection of outstanding payments takes an enormous amount of time and consumes valuable resources.
"There's nothing creative about fees," Boniface said. "We're in the business of serving kids."
The district has been exploring creative ways to raise funds. School officials are excited about a potential partnership with a company called EdNets. EdNets will provide parents, residents and educators with a registered rewards card that will allow users to earn money for the schools while shopping at more than 250 online merchants.
In addition to the rewards card, EdNets will also provide the district and each of its schools with new Web sites.
Although school officials are optimistic about the EdNets venture and the prospect for additional, non fee-based fund-raising, the student activity fee remains in place.
The School Committee approved the $100 per year fee for all sports and many after-school activities. The fee cannot exceed $100, and covers all sports and activities that a student wishes to participate in.
Activities such as the Students Against Drunk Driving and the literary magazine require students to pay the fee. Some activities, however - including yearbook, band, student council, National Honor Society, peer mediation, Gay-Straight Alliance and the newspaper - do not require the $100 fee.
http://www.communityadvocate.com/html/marlboro_articles_4.html