Breederbitching about Dan Radcliffe nude in Equus

Some British and American breeders have their knickers in a knot because Daniel Radcliffe is appearing nude in a London stage version of "Equus".

Where in the hell do these fucktards get off dictating what roles an actor might play just because he plays a FICTIONAL character in a series of movies that have appeal to their shithead brats? Just playing Harry Potter does not mean Dan Radcliffe's career has to stall permanently in juvenile mode or in G-rated crap!

While I was in a Starbucks this morning, I overheard some moo behind me bitching about the "nude Harry" on the internet. I could not resist, so I turned around to her and said, "You do realize that he is an actor playing a fictional part, don't you? Or were you too stupid to miss that?" She looked at me and started spewing all of the crap about role models, etc., and before I could say something else, a woman behind me rolled her eyes and said to the moo, "Honey, you are supposed to teach your kids that it's just a story. If they are supposed to follow your example, you're not a very good mother." The moo stepped out of line and went off with tears in her eyes.

Hopefully, it woke the stupid bitch up about her brats and their expectations. The stupid bitch needs to get a grip.

This is exactly what pisses me off about breeders and Harry Potter. As an adult fan of the series, I understand that little Harry is going to grow up. My question to her is, has she read the books? There's some seriously dark stuff in the fifth and sixth volumes, and who knows what kind of shit is going to hit the fan in the last one. Don't even get me started on fundie breeders who think Harry Potter is satan incarnate...

Furthermore, Dan Radcliffe is a teenage boy-so by definition, he's not a little angel! If anyone here caught last Sunday's "Extras" on HBO, you know what I'm talking about!

Yeah, I heard about this on another board. People are so stupid! First of all, Daniel Radcliffe is an actor! He is NOT Harry Potter! Harry Potter is a storybook character. Plus, Daniel, like all human children, has grown up and has reached sexual maturity. Get over it!

Honestly, what will these breeders do when their kids turn 17? Still treat them like children? Forbid them to date?

And what about that moo who is trying to ban Harry Potter from her school system.

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metro/gwinnett/stories/2007/01/26/0128gwxmallory.html

Honestly, if anything, the Bible is more violent and inappropriate for children than any Harry Potter book. Think back to the story of Joseph. You have a guy who has about 10 different wives. His daughter gets raped. The perp wants to marry his daughter so the guy says ok, but you and your tribe need to get circumsized. They do but while they're recovering, the sons decide to kill them all. And some time later, they throw their little brother down a well and sell him to slavery. Yup, I want my kids reading that cause this story teaches great morals...

The horror! THE HORROR!! An actor?! Appearing NUDE?!!! OH! MY! GOD!

Seriously, it's not like he's in a porno, or really in anything that the CHYLLLEEDDRRRUUUUNNN have any sort of access to. I mean, he's appearing ON STAGE IN ENGLAND (so go check out his junk, Merc, and report back!), and I'm pretty sure they aren't going to be letting anyone under the age of 15 in.
And if someone could explain why he's being a bad role model by appearing in a serious stage production, where he happens to be nude, that sure would be helpful. It's not like hes a talentless, perpetually wasted celebutard who's flashing her junk every time she exits a car.

Aren't you legally an adult at 16 in Great Britain? Therefore, Dan can bare all.. Feh, I intend to fly over there as as a birthday present this spring and see the play - and I will report back! Another joy and reward of childfreedom..

yes, your a legal adult at 16, you can marry, have gay sex, smoke,join the army but not drink.. he is probably going to be in london, about 250 miles from where i live.

but theres been no real shock here

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=432493&in_page_id=1773 theres some pictures of him on that link near naked.. for your enjoyment ladies and gents if thats your thing.

theres no real problem so far..

I cant believe the comments coming from these parents. At the end of the day Daniel Radcliffe is a 17 year old young man. He can't stay in Harry Potter mode all of his life. If he is to have a sucessful acting career he needs to try out diffent things and the stage certainly hasn't harmed the careers of other big stars.
If parents are not happy for their children to watch him in nude sex scenes then they simply don't take them to see the play.

- L Knight, Gibraltar

Surely any parent who is concerned will have the commonsense not to take their children to see the play- thats called free will! Whatever the complaints from others- congratulations Daniel, you're a great actor and should take a variety of roles, wish you massive success.

- Dawn, England

only one person said a negative, that it was somehow child abuse.. 17 is an adult..i say go for it,


and if you have seen the prices for the seats £63 or $126, what parent would pay for a kid to go see it..

*********************************************************************************************************************************
I just post the stories, for interest.. for everyone

Lord, what fools these mortals be!
- A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Act III, Scene ii

Voltaire said: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."

H.L.Mencken wrote:"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. Albert Einstein

Yes folks, once again, let's foam pad the entire world so the ccchhhyyyyllllddddrrruuuunnnnn don't have to look at anything that might scar their pweshus little psyches.

Maybe breeders want to go back to the old days of castrato boy singers. God forbid a male actor should grow up and grow chest hair and stuff.

mercurior Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------


> and if you have seen the prices for the seats £63
> or $126, what parent would pay for a kid to go see
> it..

The same parents who spend $300 for a Nintendo Wii or Sony Playstation; the same ones who buy Sprogleigh and Brattina a brand-new luxury car for their 16th birthdays; the same ones who throw massive birthday parties for their sprogs, invite 300 people, and pay for a catering hall and top-of-the-line entertainment like hiring a petting zoo, clowns, the Wiggles, and a moonwalk.

where i live it costs about $100 to travel to london, plus its at night so you would have to stay over nite minimum of $100, for a lot of people london is another country. i have been to london, 3 times, in my life, and all 3 times i stayed less than 1 hour (it was a change to another train or coach.)

its slightly different in the UK we dont generally do stuff like that

*********************************************************************************************************************************
I just post the stories, for interest.. for everyone

Lord, what fools these mortals be!
- A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Act III, Scene ii

Voltaire said: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."

H.L.Mencken wrote:"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. Albert Einstein

Given the ticket prices and how fucking cheap most breeders are, few, if any of them, will ever take their brats to see the play. At least that is one thing that will keep the assholes away from the theatre to allow Dan Radcliffe to give a good performance on stage without all of the indignant, self-righteous and hypocritical breeders interfering.

To any asshole breeders lurking: It is YOUR responsibility to teach your brats what is fantasy and what is reality. If you can't handle the job, put your twatrockets up for adoption and shut the fuck up already.

Yet another bible thumper with their own agenda. I live in Arkansas (I moved from a more enlightened universe - CALIFORNIA!), and a few years back some fundie illiterates tried to ban Harry Potter books from an elementary school in Cedarville, AR (a town with not much of a population).

To cut to the chase, the fundies lost, but the school district had to pay both of the parties' court costs. (The fundies at a subsequent school district meeting had the ludicrous idea of the district just not paying the money! Dumb asses, you don't say "I'm not paying" to Federal Court!!!!

I thought the fundies should have been charged with payment. Talk about your morons.

There are a lot of RELIGIOUS nuts in Arkansas. I have seen very few Christians, however. And they would probably fight to the death (I wish!) if someone tried to restrict their reading. But again, that's a lot of the religious loonies agenda - they tell everyone what to think, what to do, what to read. Their followers aren't smart enough to think for themselves.

Childfree and intellectual freedom FOREVER!

Here are some pics... Come sit on my lap any time!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/276311a13656.html

As utterly toothsome as that boy-man has grown, the audience is in for a dreadful shock during that nude scene. Sure, it felt lovely when her mouth was in his, but when he realized that the horses were looking on in disapproval, the solution was not to have sighted horses.

I can't recall if it was an icepick or a hoof-pick. All I know is that a herd of horses was brutally mutilated (blinded) by one loved and was loved by them. Explain that, breeders, and make it seem worse than the sight of a nubile young torso and pelvis.

"Equus! Thou seest...NOTHING!"

Cristabel.

That is the problem of attaining stardom as a child. The parents of the young movie or telly watchers do not want the actors to "grow up". Even when the male or female actor is in her 20's, s/he is still expected to play babyish roles to appease these moos.

At least, the Harry Potter guy is able to grow into adult roles rather than be a "has-been" due to only being seen as a childhood hero. Many of the former child stars do have major problems because they cannot morph out of their old roles from their youth.

Britney Spears is an example of the above paragraph. Her fan base got older so "bubblegum pop music" was no longer on the agenda for her. She marries that guy with a name like FedEx after a five-minute drunken marriage to a high school sweetheart. All she can do now is flash her cunt and ass while out on the town wearing no underwear or fall asleep at 'da club to get PR.

"FUCK WORK"

Annie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> There are a lot of RELIGIOUS nuts in Arkansas. I
> have seen very few Christians, however. And they
> would probably fight to the death (I wish!) if
> someone tried to restrict their reading. But
> again, that's a lot of the religious loonies
> agenda - they tell everyone what to think, what to
> do, what to read. Their followers aren't smart
> enough to think for themselves.
>
> Childfree and intellectual freedom FOREVER!

Annie, you are 100% how most religious people cannot think for themselves! Banning reading material is the first way to control the people. Of course, Christians and other religions use the mega-breeding with their anti-contraception/abortion attitudes to keep the "faithful" in line. After all, it is hard for a woman to think for herself if she has a passel of children, toddlers, and babies to look after. Hell, she cannot even leave an abusive spouse knowing she cannot support herself since she has been so indoctrinated to do as her church and husband tells her to do.

"FUCK WORK"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=436762&in_page_id=1773

The bare facts are: Radcliffe's a revelation
by BAZ BAMIGBOYE - More by this author »

Last updated at 13:16pm on 17th February 2007
Daniel Radcliffe on stage in Equus

It wasn't a question of horsing around when Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe took to the London stage in all his glory. The 17-year-old truly impressed with a bravura full-frontal display that earned him a standing ovation.

For his first leading role in the West End, Radcliffe chose Peter Shaffer's 34-year-old play Equus, where he plays a stable boy being treated by a psychiatrist for blinding six horses with a hoof pick.

*********************************************************************************************************************************
I just post the stories, for interest.. for everyone

Lord, what fools these mortals be!
- A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Act III, Scene ii

Voltaire said: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."

H.L.Mencken wrote:"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. Albert Einstein