Anonymous User
Re: My Childfree Rules March 04, 2012 |
Re: My Childfree Rules March 05, 2012 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 168 |
Anonymous User
Re: My Childfree Rules March 05, 2012 |
Anonymous User
Re: My Childfree Rules March 05, 2012 |
I only speak "baby talk" to non-humans, for I love them to pieces, and they're sweet.Quote
juliewashere88
Quote
fade_to_pale
Julie, you are awesome. I've adopted most of these. Some others I will adopt when the final bits of my soul die from faking it to make it (which is unfortunately highly necessary, in some instances, which just absolutely kills me). I don't build bridges, but I don't want to burn any that might set me on fire, before I have enough time to get away. I've already said a lot about my CF status though, and I won't hide it, be ashamed of it, or let anyone try to make me feel ashamed of it.
You should post this on your office wall, lol. That would be a scream.
I certainly would, had I an office.
I've thought of another one. I will not use babbling baby-talk. Ever. The closest I come is talking to my dog in cheerful voice, but doing so in English.
Re: My Childfree Rules March 05, 2012 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,320 |
Re: My Childfree Rules March 11, 2012 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,320 |
Quote
juliewashere88
Whew! I finally posted my list. I wrote a lot more, I'm up to about 70 rules and that's after combining a few.
Check it out
Quote
person 1
This was great, except for the breastfeeding one, because, well, frankly, it sounds kinda prudish. I think Americans as a whole are pretty uptight about nudity. I think the fact that people get offended by tits in public is kinda offensive. Do you really get offended by a woman taking her tit out in front of you?
Call me crazy, but I'm not interested in viewing the leaking privates of strangers when I'm trying to enjoy a nice steak.Quote
me
Offended? No. Disgusted.
Quote
person 1
Julie, seriously, you’re “disgusted†when a woman takes her tit out? That’s a bit extreme, kinda like a hangup. What is disgusting about a breast? It’s how humans have fed infants since time immemorial (or at least until formula manufacturers screwed that up). Is it your aversion to female anatomy or is it your aversion to children. I’d understand the latter… the former is quite repressive
Quote
me
So it’s ok for a man to whip out his cock in public? On a playground? What, you don’t have any hang ups about human bodies or men, do you? It’s just a penis. Men have gone about uncovered since time immemorial until pants messed that up
Ok sarcasm off, do you have any idea how many children who would have otherwise been malnourished or starved are saved by formula? Do you know how many women are able to achieve more in life thanks to formula? Oh yeah, formula is the devil, right?
Quote
Person 2
Such an interesting list to read! We obviously differ in our views on quite a few things (I’m pretty community minded and don’t expect parents and children to regulate their behaviour all that much for my benefit, and I would never condone any kind of violence towards a child).
Quote
me
I’m community minded so I expect EVERYONE, without exception, to behave appropriately.
Quote
complete idiot 1
Your views on children are yours to choose but they are quite judgmental. You clearly find no problem discriminately against children and parents base on a prejudice. It’s discrimination you’re advocating and I hope you realize this.
Quote
me
Holding children and parents to the same standards as everyone else is discriminatory? How do you figure?
Quote
idiot 2
I think you make a mistake in assuming that there is a set of universal standards that applies to all people equally. Can you think of a time or place in history where this has ever been the case? Even theoretically, this doesn’t make sense. For example, if a man with normal cognitive faculties had a screaming tantrum in public because he didn’t get what he wanted, most folks would look down on that and not be very forgiving. However, if the same man had a severe mental handicap, we would probably be forgiving and try to be helpful.
It just is the case that we make different accommodations for different people depending on their individual situations. We codify it in our laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. We institute policies like affirmative action. And we have informal social contracts with each other that govern our treatment of people in different circumstances.
Quote
me
Neither being a child or being a parent constitutes disability. If a person, be they a child or adult behaves badly, they deserve to be called out on it.
If a young child not old enough to know better behaves badly, that’s likely the parents’ fault.
There is no excuse, for instance, for a child to run screaming through a Denny’s. There is no excuse for a parent to not only ignore that behavior, but to smile at me as if to ask “isn’t that cute?†No, it fucking isn’t. And I will say so.
If a person can not behave appropriately in public then they have no business being in public. Period.
Quote
idiot 2
>> If a person can not behave appropriately in public then they have no business being in public. Period.
With a statement like this you are indeed advocating for discrimination. This is pretty abhorrent. Who decides the standard? If someone is physically unable to meet that standard, should he effectively be in home confinement for his entire life? Does your personal desire to lead a public life unpolluted by the idiosyncrasies of others really trump the rights of others to be in public as well?
You may not want to have children, and that’s completely fine. I applaud you for public claiming so and describing rational reasons for feeling that way. However, you live in a society that includes children, and to some extent their limitations need to be accounted for in public life. The special needs of young children and their mothers needs to be accounted for, and if they are not that is indeed discriminatory.
Quote
hit and run poster
Thanks for letting us watch your descent from sane to crazy