http://crooksandliars.com/2014/03/paul-ryan-kids-getting-free-lunches-dont
While I think this guy and most of his statements and philosophies are asinine, I took delight in the hoopla he created among breeders and WIC-Welfare Whores over his most recent commentary regarding free lunches. Below are his comments followed by the angry mob of comments with my thoughts in red:ObamaCare Discourages Millions from Working(Says Ryan)Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) asserted on Thursday that liberals did not understand that kids who got free lunches at school did not have parents who cared about them at home. Speaking to the Conservative Political Action Conference, the former Republican vice presidential nominee argued that conservatives should let Democrats be the "party of personality," while "we will be the party of ideas.""I'm optimistic about our chances because the left, the left just isn't out of ideas, they're out of touch," he explained. "Take Obamacare -- not literally, but figuratively here, okay? We now know that this law will discourage millions of people from working. The left thinks this is a good thing."
Obama Care is a lot of shitty things, but that it will discourage millions from working isn't one of them. That's why Medicaid, WIC-SNAP, Kiddie Crazy checks, Section 8, and Cash Aid to Baby Daddyless Single Moo Kids was invented.m:bayybee:bayybee:bayybee
Free Lunch=Parents Who Don't Care(According to Ryan)Ryan insisted that liberals were only offering people
"a full stomach and an empty soul."He then told a story of a "young boy from a very poor family" who received free lunches at school "from a government program.""He didn't want a free lunch," Ryan insisted. "He wanted his own lunch, one in a brown paper bag, just like the other kids."
"He wanted one, he said, because he knew a kid with a brown paper bag had someone who cared for him. This is what the left does not understand."
As fucked up as this may sound, I "get" what he's talking about. Back in the 70's when people still had personal pride and a sense of shame and"free lunch" tickets were bright pink as opposed to the paid(by the parents)green lunch tickets, I knew MANY kids who hid their pink tickets and paid cash for their lunch they earned from baby sitting or grass cutting. Everyone knew the green ticket holders and the brown baggers had moms to pack and/or pay for their lunches. Now though, with 75% or more of kids in public schools getting free or reduced lunches and so many restrictions on what CAN(and can't) be taken to school for lunch, I think the stigma of the "free lunch"is gone. While his commentary and stance is quite dated, it's still entertaining to witness all the public outcry about it. Therefore, for entertainment and fodder purposes I present you with the breeder outrage fallout:Breeder Comments1)I have had people send their kids over to our place right around dinner time. We knew why. Glad to help when I can, but sometimes it was we adults that gave up our meals for someone else's kid's meal. Does Ryan have any idea how little self respect you can retain when you have to do that to your kids' friends?
SURELY he isn't advocating "the village" take in neighborhood strays who knock on our door at meal time? Although I am not certain of the exact circumstances, I have had two separate cases of neighborhood kids in two different areas between 1990 and 2000 actually come to my door and ask for food and/or something to drink on more than one occasion. It was a very awkward situation, to say the fucking least! My mother would have freaked out had we done that.2)Gee, when you take away their food stamps, their unemployment insurance, and God know what else, how in heck do you expect the parents to prepare a brown bag lunch? Seriously? Is this guy TOTALLY out of touch with reality.....apparently so!!
Such horse shit. No food stamps or unemployment compensation has been "taken away", unless he's referring to the lessening of the time benefits can be paid from a year to 6 months or maybe the slight reductions in food stamp eligibility, like ONLY for five years in some states instead of for life. Regardless, if they can't even send a fucking cheese sandwich for lunch and a quarter for a carton of milk then WHY do they keep pumping out kids?3)Do any of these assholes have any idea how difficult it is for families -- of whatever configuration -- to deal with job loss, poverty, and hunger without the oh-so-convenient and probably apocryphal "shame" stories? Or do they simply not give a flying f*ck -- revealing themselves to be the sociopaths that they are? (that was a rhetorical question)!
Do any of these assholes realize Un-childed people deal with the same shit and live in the same economy and do NOT get free lunches? Impoverished people shouldn't have babies! WHY would someone subsisting in abject poverty themselves even WANT to subject a kid to that lifestyle?4)Here's a more practical consideration. Most schools don't have refrigerator space for kids, so sending meat / cheese / mayonaise / cream cheese products invites food poisoning. This rules out most leftovers, so I would have to buy special food just for school lunches...as well as brown paper bags, plastic utensils, lots of ziplocks or other food containers.
It's not like sending food from home is free. Schools ban peanut butter because another child can have an allergic reaction to the presence of peanut butter in the room. Our schools are now banning lots of junk food items, even if brought from home. If I needed to send food to school on an ongoing, daily basis, I'm not sure what I would actually be able to SEND beyond raw fruit and vegetables.
This one here misses the whole point. It's also not like the "free lunches" are actually "free" either.5)I have got a "libertarian" at work who thinks that way. He got where he is today because of the GI bill, but thinks that the Gov't is hurting people by feeding them or helping in any way.
The GI Bill has NOTHING to do with free lunches, at all. These people keep confusing the perks of working, like with comments about this and unemployment compensation, with government hand outs for breeders and their kids. Apples and oranges.6)Yeah, cause poor loving parents would prefer their kid goes hungry at school. Bastard!
No one wants your kid to go hungry, we just want YOU to feed your OWN kids. A "loving" person wouldn't keep creating children they can't afford to feed7)How souless must someone be if they want children to starve? How evil?
No one wants the little bastards to starve, they just want YOU to feed your OWN kid! They always pipe up about how everyone wants their kids to starve when it's THEIR fault the kid is even here in the first place AND hungry.8)Is something wrong with Ryan? Is he on drugs or something? He must know that the reason some kids get free lunch is because their parent can't afford it and instead of given the family enough money to buy the food needed to make lunch they decide to feed only the children. The parents love their children they just can afford to feed them.
That's because it's proven over and over again if you give the parents cash they will spend it on themselves! That, and EVEN WHEN they get SNAP and WIC they STILL apply for and get free breakfast, lunch, snacks and dinner in the government subsidized after school programs! NO KID in The United States goes without food unless the parents starve them while they are at home and/or are too lazy to fill out the free lunch forms. WHAT are they spending their WIC-SNAP on if not for cheese sandwiches and carrot sticks? A loaf of bread cost 89 cents, a pack of sliced cheese $2, bag of carrots 99 cents, a dozen apples is about $4, and a pack of 100 brown bags is about $1.29. SO, for $10 they can send their kid to school, on the SNAP dime, with a fucking brown bagged lunch and money for a carton of milk ALL WEEK, with shit left over for snacks and week end lunches! Cut that cost in half or more if they also get WIC because the cheese, bread, carrots, and apples are free:sbx
9)This is a terrible argument. You never attack children and their parents.
Geeeeez. NO ONE is "attacking" children, they are simply saying parents should be able to feed their own kids or STOP reproducing. VERY rare is the kid on a temporary "free lunch" program. The typical is 3 or more siblings in the same famblee on the "free lunch" program grades K-12! This common breeder mentality is since we have CHHYYYLDREN, we are beyond reproach and unworthy of any criticism, as if irresponsibly spawning gives them a lifetime get out of jail free card regardless of their careless actions and free loading life long lifestyle choices10)Does Congressman "Heartless Fuck" Ryan have dead-daddy issues? I mean, he went to college because of Social Security survivor's benefits after his dad died.
Again, social security benefits have NOTHING to do with WIC-SNAP and free meal programs. One was earned and the other was not. There are lifer WIC-Welfare whores with 3 or more kids and counting who NEVER worked, and never intend to, and neither did her Moo ever work! These fuckers need to learn the difference between earned benefits and freebies.:headbrick
11)The elementary kids in my school probably have no idea they are on free or reduced lunch since the parents fill out the paperwork during enrollment and the kids just go through the line like anyone else. Their names are in the computer and their purchases are recorded there. It is people like Ryan who stigmatize these students and he should be ashamed. Why does Paul Ryan hate innocent children? If the parents hated their kids they wouldn't sign them up for school lunches. They would let them starve. So called Christians like Ryan turn my stomach.
Like I already mentioned, the stigma is now gone. They don't even have to use food stamps anymore, instead they just swipe their EBT card AS IF it's a debit card with cash balances they earned. More of he "hates innocent children" when that has NOTHING do to with the issue. I don't want kids to go hungry, I want their PARENTS to pay for their food! They make me sick how they pull out the kid card and claim everyone hates their kid, when in fact if they have kids they knowingly can't afford and keep having more, few actions illustrate a lack of love more than that!------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
If YOU are the "exception" to what I am saying, then why does my commentary bother you so much?
I don't hate your kids, I HATE YOU!