Another spare behind the royal heir September 12, 2017 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 2,064 |
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 12, 2017 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 344 |
Quote
cfdavep
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/people-aren-apos-t-happy-191604232.html
Apparenly Kate begged for heir # 3 and some commenters are saying to f^$& off with the over breeding already.
That Kate seems to do little in life except live in luxury and breed like a high end pure bred horse
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 12, 2017 | Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 9,199 |
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 12, 2017 | Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 2,064 |
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 12, 2017 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 344 |
Quote
bell_flower
Look at what happened to Princess Masako, who was hassled endlessly to produce a son after she had one daughter. (Japan is very sexist and the succession laws were not changed--her female child will be passed over for the throne and it will go to her male cousin instead.)
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 12, 2017 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,713 |
Quote
cfdavep
Being in England myself, I think the main reason for all the Kate hate is because of the recent cap in child benefits (After April 1st 2017, breeders can't claim child benefits for more than 2 children. There are some exceptions however, like if you're expecting your third child before the cap came into place, of if you can prove your 3rd pregnancy was a result of sexual assault - why you'd wanna keep it in that case I have no idea).
Don't get me wrong, I'm not too chuffed about it myself, because it means another year or so of royal baby news being on the front page, but at least Kate's third child is unlikely to grow up to be a worthless, drug-dealing, entitled scumbag like most bred-for-more-welfare-money kids are.
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 13, 2017 | Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 353 |
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 13, 2017 | Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 146 |
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 13, 2017 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,434 |
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 13, 2017 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 344 |
Quote
yurble
Rich people think overpopulation doesn't apply to them. Their kids use more resources than plebs.
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 13, 2017 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 3,978 |
Quote
lurker-derp
Quote
yurble
Rich people think overpopulation doesn't apply to them. Their kids use more resources than plebs.
Yeah, but at least rich people can pay for their own spawn. People can shout 'eugenics!' at me all they like, the fact remains that you shouldn't have children or pets that you can't afford to look after on your own dime.
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 13, 2017 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,713 |
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 14, 2017 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,434 |
Quote
lurker-derp
Quote
yurble
Rich people think overpopulation doesn't apply to them. Their kids use more resources than plebs.
Yeah, but at least rich people can pay for their own spawn. People can shout 'eugenics!' at me all they like, the fact remains that you shouldn't have children or pets that you can't afford to look after on your own dime.
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 14, 2017 | Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,713 |
Quote
yurble
Quote
lurker-derp
Quote
yurble
Rich people think overpopulation doesn't apply to them. Their kids use more resources than plebs.
Yeah, but at least rich people can pay for their own spawn. People can shout 'eugenics!' at me all they like, the fact remains that you shouldn't have children or pets that you can't afford to look after on your own dime.
In one sense, yes, people who are wealthy aren't requiring tax money to pay for their offspring. In the other sense, we all pay for it. Destruction to the environment affects us all, and the richer a person is the more their children will consume. That's why I don't think it is a personal choice, any more than it is a matter of choice to dump raw sewage in the ocean or to play with matches in a dry forest.
This is why I loathe the hypocritical Al Gore, who also didn't need tax money to help his ridiculously large brood.
Re: Another spare behind the royal heir September 18, 2017 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,304 |