Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Talking about feminism

Posted by yurble 
Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Started as a splinter of this thread. I'm going to dig up some of my early posts about feminism and childfreedom when I get the chance, but in the meantime I would love to hear your views.

I am probably close to first-wave. I was raised by a first-wave feminist and to be honest I have never understood what the different waves are supposed to be (I never took women's studies). Fundamentally, I believe feminism is about equal rights and responsibilities for men and women. That means equal opportunities, but also equal punishments/sanctions. I don't see the empowerment of pole dancing although I'm not anti-sex. I also don't think 'equal opportunities' means artificially boosting women up to compensate for the choices they make which set them back.
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Quote
yurble
I am probably close to first-wave. I was raised by a first-wave feminist and to be honest I have never understood what the different waves are supposed to be (I never took women's studies).

The Three Waves of Feminism
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Ah, I always thought of the suffragettes as being, well, suffragettes, not "first wave feminists." So I guess I was raised by a second-wave feminist. I think I've opted for the buffet. I agree with the premise of equality but I don't think the right to vote goes far enough. I don't think that the world would magically be a better place if women were in charge, or that women have some inherent nurturing quality. I don't believe in 'sisterhood'; women can be assholes too. But as I said, I'm also not keen on pole dancing as a form of empowerment.
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Yurble, about the "pole dancing = empowerment" idea - about ten years ago I read E*rica J*ong's F*ear of Flying trilogy (from the late 70s-early 80s). I couldn't believe that it was considered a feminist novel, seemingly just because she wrote graphically about her sex life, and that wasn't common in its time, or at least in the way she wrote about it. In the book, she cheated on her husband with some stranger, got bored with him, and at the end of the first book ended up going back to him because she obviously needed a mayun to take care of her. Then, in the next book she ends up cheating on him again, leaving him for a younger guy and having a loaf "because it's what you do". Yeah, really feminist eye rolling smiley But she is considered some kind of feminist hero for her works, so I don't know.

IMO it's one thing to be comfortable with your sexuality but I don't like the idea of oversharing about one's sex life/organs = empowerment. Saw this ad recently and it made me cringe - there are people saying it is "empowering" for young girls but I think it's gross and inappropriate:

http://www.policymic.com/articles/57277/the-tampon-commercial-you-wish-you-d-seen-as-a-kid
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
I believe, like most movements, the origins were good, but eventually became corrupted by those who wanted to use it for their own agendas. When feminism first came about-actually long before the 60's-women could not vote, own property and were restricted to certain jobs. Overall, they were pretty much objects that could be owned. The idea of women being equals to men was not a new concept-celtic society made little to no differentiation between a man and a woman: they both could rule and go into battle, for example.

The concept has moved however from having rights and being seen as equals to men to getting more rights because you have tits and a vagina and to condemning any woman who does not believe that the first and foremost considerations one must have as a woman are birth control, abortion and lesbianism. I am all for women being equals to men, but I do not think I should get a job over a man who is more qualified simply because I am a woman. I'm a person, not a quota percentage. And I think, while abortion, birth control and gay rights are important and worthy of debate, I find it very insulting to think that I am called "less of a woman" because I believe in things such as my having second amendment rights to defend myself against rapists and abusive boyfriends or because I am concerned about the effects on my ability to get healthcare from an administration that thinks I do not need mammograms and pap tests regularly in order to detect cancer or other medical issues.
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Quote
yurble
Ah, I always thought of the suffragettes as being, well, suffragettes, not "first wave feminists." So I guess I was raised by a second-wave feminist. I think I've opted for the buffet. I agree with the premise of equality but I don't think the right to vote goes far enough. I don't think that the world would magically be a better place if women were in charge, or that women have some inherent nurturing quality. I don't believe in 'sisterhood'; women can be assholes too. But as I said, I'm also not keen on pole dancing as a form of empowerment.

I don't view that movement as separate from the one in the later 20th century, but the whole thing as a continuation-as women gained one freedom, they sought to gain others. In the 1940's, women were allowed to hold jobs and participate into things that were traditionally filled by men because the men were off fighting WW2. Many actually liked doing that work and were not keen on getting out of it. I think the suffragettes and the "rosie the riveters" set up the wave of feminism in the 60's and 70's.

Just for the record, I still think sexism exists. I think there are still glass ceilings and I still think women get different treatment from men on many things. But I think that there is an active obfuscation going on about what is "feminism" and "women's rights"-the same groups that cry about Rush Limbaugh's verbal attacks on Sandra Fluke think nothing about a mayor or a governor conducting sting operations with private investigators that targetted women and minorities buying guns at gun shows, on the misguided belief that both MUST be doing strawman purchases for criminal men (I'm talking about Bloomberg especially).
Anonymous User
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Oh! Here it is.

Feel free to delete my post in the other thread. Here's a reposting of my reply to you.

Quote
lilin_unite
Quote
yurble
I'd be curious in knowing where you depart from first wave feminism, if you don't mind sharing (perhaps in another thread). So few women that I meet want to be seen as feminists, which makes it difficult to have a conversation on the subject.

Those that do want the label of feminism actually mean femoonism (all they care about are breast-feeding anywhere they like and increasing the number of perks that moos get) or the advertiser's vision of feminism wherein any choice made by a woman is feminist because a woman made it (these are the kinds who want all the rights and none of the responsibility).

Mostly, just updating it for the modern issues and areas of inquiry that currently exist, which are more sociological in nature. So it's a completely different *platform* than original first-wave feminism, but it's the same fundamental ethos underlying it, which I feel has been lost from modern mainstream feminist (and most of the fringes too).

Yes. This wave of feminism is all about "mooism" and "everyone gets a gold star" (if a woman does it, it must be feminist and good). It find it intellectually insulting to everyone, honestly. It reduces women to children themselves, who can't be expected to understand things like common decency or public manners. In some cases, like divorce/custody court, it makes men responsible for these helpless women, and erodes their own right to their own lives.

I want nothing to do with it.

Basically, I relate to first wave's culture of action and accepting consequences of their actions (such as suffragettes asking to be arrested when they protested illegally like a man would be, when women normally weren't arrested in those times). Not so much the "morally superior" thing and all that -- that's just a product of the times and the tendency to try to make everything fit in new and shiny biological boxes, I think.

The message was more about women being fully sentient beings, and less about giving women a head pat for everything they do.
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Quote
Ketchup
Yurble, about the "pole dancing = empowerment" idea - about ten years ago I read E*rica J*ong's F*ear of Flying trilogy (from the late 70s-early 80s). I couldn't believe that it was considered a feminist novel, seemingly just because she wrote graphically about her sex life, and that wasn't common in its time, or at least in the way she wrote about it. In the book, she cheated on her husband with some stranger, got bored with him, and at the end of the first book ended up going back to him because she obviously needed a mayun to take care of her. Then, in the next book she ends up cheating on him again, leaving him for a younger guy and having a loaf "because it's what you do". Yeah, really feminist eye rolling smiley But she is considered some kind of feminist hero for her works, so I don't know.

I read the first book and I dunno, maybe it was empowering at the time, but there's no way it can compare to something like The Well of Loneliness. The character was all Me Me Me and I couldn't connect with her at all, despite the fact that I am in favor of knowing what you want sexually and seeking it.

At the same time, I couldn't get behind Dworkin and her whole idea of it being a form of oppression.

I think Ariel Levy provides a sort of middle ground; Female Chauvinist Pigs put into words what I think is wrong with many of these recent ideas of (certain type of) male-fantasy focused sex acts as subversive empowerment.
Anonymous User
Re: Talking about feminism
August 04, 2013
Quote
yurble
I read the first book and I dunno, maybe it was empowering at the time, but there's no way it can compare to something like The Well of Loneliness. The character was all Me Me Me and I couldn't connect with her at all, despite the fact that I am in favor of knowing what you want sexually and seeking it.

At the same time, I couldn't get behind Dworkin and her whole idea of it being a form of oppression.

I think Ariel Levy provides a sort of middle ground; Female Chauvinist Pigs put into words what I think is wrong with many of these recent ideas of (certain type of) male-fantasy focused sex acts as subversive empowerment.

I agree, and I've only recently figured out how to articulate exactly why. I found my words in a discussion about porn and whether it's inherently oppressive to women.

To say that industries involving sexuality are inherently oppressive to women implies that women have no agency in choosing them, and also that women couldn't possibly enjoy sexual work, which is kind of an outgrowth of this "women as non-sexual beings" meme.

It's part of the "poor little women" mentality, which was originally a facet of patriarchy, and has now been adopted by the modern feminist movement as well.

Some women choose those professions because they enjoy them. Some simply don't mind it, but love the money. That doesn't make them feminist or not feminist for doing so, but women are choosing these professions, and some of them actually do enjoy it.

Rather than spending our efforts trying to eradicate them, and implying that women are both helpless and non-sexual, we should be spending our efforts on things designed to ensure women enter these professions fully voluntarily and have adequate protection while on the job.

Certainly, there are cases of oppression and coercion in sexual work, but that isn't necessarily an inherent characteristic of the job; it's a characteristic of the situation.
Re: Talking about feminism
August 05, 2013
Quote
lilin_unite

Some women choose those professions because they enjoy them. Some simply don't mind it, but love the money. That doesn't make them feminist or not feminist for doing so, but women are choosing these professions, and some of them actually do enjoy it.

Rather than spending our efforts trying to eradicate them, and implying that women are both helpless and non-sexual, we should be spending our efforts on things designed to ensure women enter these professions fully voluntarily and have adequate protection while on the job.

If adult women choose to get into the business that is their choice, but there is no need for specific protections for them, and that actually does imply that they are helpless and in need of specific oversight. If it is across the board for all porn actors (I do think most is acting, so women in the business don't have to be sexual or enjoy the acts, they just have to pretend to be) then that is fine but it should be standardized within the industry. They do get tested and such now but with all the amateur porn and weird stuff coming out people are choosing to take significant risks to get the most hits. That's their choice and it's a shame if anyone is being exploited, male or female.
Anonymous User
Re: Talking about feminism
August 05, 2013
Quote
blondie
If adult women choose to get into the business that is their choice, but there is no need for specific protections for them, and that actually does imply that they are helpless and in need of specific oversight. If it is across the board for all porn actors (I do think most is acting, so women in the business don't have to be sexual or enjoy the acts, they just have to pretend to be) then that is fine but it should be standardized within the industry. They do get tested and such now but with all the amateur porn and weird stuff coming out people are choosing to take significant risks to get the most hits. That's their choice and it's a shame if anyone is being exploited, male or female.

Not in the least, when you consider that the sex industry generally has lazier oversight than any other. There's more laws in recent years, but most of them are easy to sort of fudge around.

Also, I think there's a difference between saying women can't make choices at all, and saying that they she have protections enforced while actually on it. Every industry should have that, and have it enforced. In such an employer's market as we have now, there's plenty of exploitation going on even in non-sexual work.
Re: Talking about feminism
August 06, 2013
I chose my job because I can do it from home and it doesn't interfere with my mental health. If I have to take a day off, it's okay. I knew in advance that it wasn't the greatest thing to do, but it was the best thing that I could do with my health considerations. Working from home offers many freedoms for me, and commuting on the bus has always been an issue for me. As far as I'm concerned, having a PSO job is better than having no job at all.

Over the years I've actually learned to enjoy my job. I don't get any sexual gratification from it, since it's all acting on my part. However, I've had the same clients for years and it's gotten easier over time for me to deal with the freakier clients. If it gets too much for me, I just schedule some time off. My boss is understanding and cool with it, as long as I let her know in advance.

I don't consider what I do to be particularly feminist, but I believe that it is the right job for me personally.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login