| Kidlesskim gets called out on a blog (Trisomy 18 Cow Moos and Lows)Posted by KABA
I will GIVE you a copy. ![]() ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- If YOU are the "exception" to what I am saying, then why does my commentary bother you so much? I don't hate your kids, I HATE YOU!
Give the Shark his own special autographed copy. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I have learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is easy and fun as hell" ![]()
The kyd's eyes lolling around in the sockets really bothers me. Really not much of anything going on in her head. I didn't read that tome of a blog, but it seems like the kid is age 4 if not 5 already. She's just now "starting" to crawl? I notice therapy is mentioned a lot. Wonder how much that therapy costs tax payers? I'm not sure exactly how this benefits anyone. What's she going to be other than a long time burden? The only thing I'm for is treatments for the cessation of pain in the kyd. It pisses me off there are people who are aware and can actually amount to something who are unable to get financial help for medical issues, when who knows how many thousands are put in to rehabilitating that breathing shell of a person. If she had the capability of thought, she'd probably wish she were dead.
yup, hundreds of thousands will be spent on therapy to reach the pinnacle of shakily standing while clinging to a walker, drooling, grunting and starting blankly into the void at 30. while still in diapers. what's the fucking point? who's going to take care of her when attention whoring moo can't?
Honestly, I feel so fucking sorry for that kid. She doesn't know much of anything, but I can guarantee that she knows the pain from all of these fucking treatments and surgeries. All her life consists of is rolling around, not knowing anything, then another fucking surgery or treatment that just brings her PAIN, and she doesn't have the brain power to understand anything beyond the pain. It makes me so fucking sick and angry. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Abstinence education You don't need to know. That's the beautiful mystery of sex. See, if I tell you about it, it won't be a mystery. It will just be a fact. An ugly, moist fact, squatting on your brain like an octopus. And you don't want an octopus squatting on your brain, do you? ... and that's where babies come from.
You know, I feel guilty enough for causing my dog pain when she was spayed. She didn't really understand what was going on. The nice doctor took her away from me, made her go to sleep and then she woke up in pain. That's about all the tritard knows. The doctors take her away from mummy, make her go to sleep and she wakes up in pain. the difference is that my dog only had to go through it once, and she got lots of nice treats afterwards. The tritard will end up going through it hundreds of time. I can never understand why the parunts don't feel guilty. Why don't they decide at some point that the kindest thing is to let the kid go. If my dog had to have hundreds of operations for any reason, I'd feel that it was time for her to leave peacefully rather that put her through hundreds of times of pain. I had an old dog when I was younger, we grew up together, but sadly, he got arthritis and his spine started crumbling (he was really old for a Great Dane!). We made the decision that rather than making him a little cart to walk around with, or putting him through countless surgeries to rebuild his spine and realign his hips, it was kinder to let him go. He went peacefully without pain - only knowing love and kindness at the end. Why don't the parunts care for their kids and think about them like most good animal owners do?
Because the parent-child relationship has a dark side to it that the saccharine, propaganda of breederism tries to cover up. Parunts own children. In the property sense. Profoundly retarded spawn define the greatest high-maintenance property. But they have their benefits too. Society gives lots of sympathy (which is usually better-you-than-me horror cleverly disguised). Being the parunt of a special needs kid in our times is as close as one can get to being a living saint. The long-suffering parunt is rewarded with attention and freebies while being excused from any accountability. That's why no one dares to tell them to let the tard go. They are simply not accountable for the pain and suffering they inflict.
For the same reason this paper on the Evolution of Childrearing was written? They just suck.
That anyone could post that sad and pathetic video and behave as if it's all an accomplishment of some merit and great news clearly illustrates several things regarding their mental status and emotional state, none of which are good. I am all "for" hope, but when there is none, and that's been medically proven time and time again, there comes a time when acceptance is in order. While I don't think there is or should be any specific time frame for acceptance to come and these heroic medical measures to cease, in general, the decision of the cessation of painful medical procedures designed to keep her "alive" needs to be made by the same outside sources that are financing it and providing the "care" that don't have an emotional stake in the outcome. As a society we have become way too emotional when dealing with hopeless situations like this with Terri Schiavo being one of the best and most publicized examples of a 15 year long death prolonged due to parents' emotions getting in the way. ![]() While I have mixed emotions about WHEN it's time to toss in the towel, I think if the "treatments" start spanning years, with no hope of any meaningful "recovery" possible, and the "village" is paying the tab that's well into the millions, that there comes a time when the decision needs to be made for them. If someone wants to prop up their brain dead loved one in the family den, continue to provide whatever care they are able, and continue to fool themselves on their own dimes, then as pitiful and abhorrent as that is, that's their own business. However, when Medicaid is footing the bill into the millions while other people, which includes plenty of children, who have a chance at a meaningful existence could be benefiting from those wasted resources, then society DOES and should have a say-so in it. I find it a slap in the face to everyone who needs medical care, and can't get it due to lack of funding, for videos of million dollar kids with rudimentary brain function to be plastered about on the internet doing nothing more than looking about with a blank stare, flicking their tongues like a wounded lizard, and rolling about at the age of 5 in diapers and with NO evidence of anyone being "home" inside their heads. ![]() Then, for their "progress" to be glorified for no other reason than their mom can't accept reality and let the poor thing go peacefully rather than forcing her to remain, "alive", so they don't have to plan a funeral and grieve as long as they maintain "hope" when there absolutely is NONE, is a preposterous waste of time and money. As long as the child is "alive", they don't have to face that "parent's worse nightmare", which in my opinion, became their CHILD'S worst nightmare from the moment of birth when they continued to resuscitate the baby over and over and over and force a critically ill, terminally diagnosed, child born with multitudes of painful defects and deformities to "live". I feel sorry for the child and sickened by the actions of the mother, but that makes me a mean and vicious childless woman in the eyes of a selfish woman like this poor girl's mother She is SO blinded by selfishness she can't even see what she's doing and has convinced herself she is a saint beyond reproach, when she is anything BUT. ![]() ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- If YOU are the "exception" to what I am saying, then why does my commentary bother you so much? I don't hate your kids, I HATE YOU!
I don't know about the whole paper, but this bit:
is WRONG. First of all, the famous Greek pederastic relationship (and we are talking about ATHENS greek, because there were huge differencies) didn't start till the boy was AT LEAST 12 (and often an year or two later. Remember, girls married at this age, back then). Second, it was most definitively NOT a sexual object. The point of the relationship wasn't sex but instruction on how to become a citizen, and the "powerful" party was DEFINITIVELY the boy, who had to show to be a prospective future good citizen by choosing the best teacher/lover among the -possibly- many that wooed him. This was essential, for a young man who choose wrongly showed lack of restrain and discernment. The man, once choosen, had to teach the boy everything on how to be a aner (a true man), and had to bring him to talk of philosophy and even to teach him politic and warfare.Often, the man would introduce the boy to his political ally. Third, the boy DID NOT leave his house! Also, the woeful confusion on the sexuality of roman and greeks is appalling for an historical paper! Romans had a sexuality defined "of rape". Men HAD to dominate (this in the first times, not later on). Greek were a lot more relaxed. And the paper forget completely the role of ethereia (the "companions", sort of geishas of ancient Greece). In short, even if it does raises some interesting point, base on those mistakes alone I am inclined to think some better research should have been made. End of OT, sorry, I had to take it out^^ _______________________ “I was talking about children that have not been properly house-trained. Left to their own impulses and indulged by doting or careless parents almost all children are yahoos. Loud, selfish, cruel, unaffectionate, jealous, perpetually striving for attention, empty-headed, for ever prating or if words fail them simply bawling, their voices grown huge from daily practice: the very worst company in the world. But what I dislike even more than the natural child is the affected child, the hulking oaf of seven or eight that skips heavily about with her hands dangling in front of her -- a little squirrel or bunny-rabbit -- and prattling away in a baby's voice.” ― Patrick O'Brian, The Truelove lib'-er-ty: the freedom given to you to make the wrong decision, based on the reasoned belief that you will normally make the right one.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum. |