Sex on the beach + child watching = prison sentence

Both had to register as sex offenders because a child witnessed them having sex. Man is serving a 2.5 year prison sentence:


http://nypost.com/2015/07/07/man-sentenced-to-2-5-years-in-prison-for-having-sex-on-beach/

If moo isnt getting any no one is

I really don't see what's wrong with finding a secluded or semi-secluded place in public and banging away. How could a brat be scarred by seeing masturbation, thrusting, et cetera? So what?

I'm not saying it should be okay for anyone to whip out their privates at any time and do as they please to induce orgasm, but this is also a great overreaction, in my opinion.

Besides, if the turdling is under a certain age, they won't know what's happening.

Kids can ruin sex lives and the rush of being spontaneous.

Quote
videogamesforeverkidsnever
I really don't see what's wrong with finding a secluded or semi-secluded place in public and banging away. How could a brat be scarred by seeing masturbation, thrusting, et cetera? So what?

I'm not saying it should be okay for anyone to whip out their privates at any time and do as they please to induce orgasm, but this is also a great overreaction, in my opinion.

Besides, if the turdling is under a certain age, they won't know what's happening.

Kids can ruin sex lives and the rush of being spontaneous.

Engaging in sexual acts in front of a minor is sexual assault. Kids have the right to discover and explore their sexuality in privacy and at a pace that's comfortable for them. Forcing anything overtly sexual on them takes that away from them.
I don't see what's so hard about keeping it in your pants until you get home.

I think its unfair that the man is going to jail but the woman isn't for doing the same thing.

I know people that go fuck on the beach, they get a rush out of it, but they at least wait till night time, when it's less likely they'll be seen.

frankly if this beach was somewhere in Europe, that sight wouldn't be shocking, just some grandmoo getting her panties in a bunch over a couple having public sex.

frankly most couples I see out in public, that still have their clothes on, are practically dry humping each other with heavy petting and over enthusiastic kissing, they might as well be having sex in public while their at it, because its dam hard to tell if their not.

the only reason this couple got caught was because they had lesser clothing on like swim wear, making it easier to tell when they were engaged in more than just excessive fondling.

also, I don't give shit if couples chose to have sex in public, or regardless of the age of persons around them, so long as their bits n pieces arnt hanging out for show, the person their with is of legal age and its all consensual, if the people around them don't like it, those people should leave.

Sex is not appropriate public behavior. Neither is breastfeeding.

If you approve of either in public, but not the other, I don't think you can have it both ways.

Quote
StudioFiftyFour
Sex is not appropriate public behavior. Neither is breastfeeding.

If you approve of either in public, but not the other, I don't think you can have it both ways.

Yep.

People are trying so hard to devolve into animals. Watch the gorillas mating, watch the mama gorilla titfeed her baby. There are videos of people shitting in parking lots and on floors of public places. It's odd that it is a different crime if a brat sees it, but exhibitionists take that risk.

So what happens if a brat sees a loaf breastfeeding in public but was bottle raised, dose it make it indecent exposure or some kind of offence because the child was exposed to it publically without understanding what its looking at?

He had priors for cocaine trafficking and was belligerent to moo. That probably clinched it for him.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From a bottle cap message on a Magic Hat #9 beer: Condoms Prevent Minivans
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I want to pick up a bus full of unruly kids and feed them gummi bears and crack, then turn them loose in Hobby Lobby to ransack the place. They will all be wearing T shirts that say "You Could Have Prevented This."

Quote
exile
So what happens if a brat sees a loaf breastfeeding in public but was bottle raised, dose it make it indecent exposure or some kind of offence because the child was exposed to it publically without understanding what its looking at?

I'm sick of all of it. Beefing in public isn't about feeding or nutrition. It's about attention whoring. Having sex in public is the same thing. Both deliver some kind of thrill to the perpetrator but no one else wants to see it.

We live in a civilization and I'm fucking tired of people who are attempting to drag us back to a hunter/gatherer society. I'm with Blondie--we need to move past the idea that we're animals. If you want to behave like a beast, go live in the jungle. Titfeed and fuck in the middle of the rainforest. But you can't do it in polite society.

And I don't write this because I'm prudish. I'm fine with strip clubs, even swingers clubs like the former Plato's Retreat. But keep it out of the public eye.

Quote
StudioFiftyFour

Quote
exile
So what happens if a brat sees a loaf breastfeeding in public but was bottle raised, dose it make it indecent exposure or some kind of offence because the child was exposed to it publically without understanding what its looking at?

I'm sick of all of it. Beefing in public isn't about feeding or nutrition. It's about attention whoring. Having sex in public is the same thing. Both deliver some kind of thrill to the perpetrator but no one else wants to see it.

We live in a civilization and I'm fucking tired of people who are attempting to drag us back to a hunter/gatherer society. I'm with Blondie--we need to move past the idea that we're animals. If you want to behave like a beast, go live in the jungle. Titfeed and fuck in the middle of the rainforest. But you can't do it in polite society.

And I don't write this because I'm prudish. I'm fine with strip clubs, even swingers clubs like the former Plato's Retreat. But keep it out of the public eye.

I don't want to see that shit, either. Even though I'm a phone ho, talk is one thing, actually seeing it is another. If I were to see something like that, I would feel embarrassed and it would probably ruin my outing. Beefing and sexual intercourse should be done in private. Not on a public beach where anyone can walk by and see you.

I agree that some things belong in private. Today, the message is your whole life has be an open book for anyone to read it, there's no room for privacy or an inner life and if you want those things, you're something to be suspicious of. The phrase "none of your business" is a major red flag to many people these days.

I'm not prudish either in that I don't mind strip clubs, porn, etc., but I also want the option to not have to look at those things if I don't want to, so they should be kept behind closed doors.

Quote
ladybug2203
If moo isnt getting any no one is

No. People have the right to avail themselves of public areas without getting an unwanted live porn display whether they are an adult or a kid or a senior citizen. My tax dollars help pay the beach I have every right to use without having to avoid two morons who want to hump and pump but are too lazy to go home or too cheap to get a room or go to a private beach at, for example, a swinger's club where this behavior is perfectly fine.

There is no such thing as "private" public property. Part of going out in public is following the rules of where you live. While I would prefer people BF in private, at least a modest and respectful person can shove an infant up under their shirt. Nobody can screw without letting their genitals be exposed. Whether I'm "getting any" or not I expect to be able to use a public beach without seeing two people screwing. It is public space and that is an activity to be done in private or on private property whether kids are present or not. It's not my job to fund people's public fuck pads.

Quote
mumofsixbirds

Quote
StudioFiftyFour

Quote
exile
So what happens if a brat sees a loaf breastfeeding in public but was bottle raised, dose it make it indecent exposure or some kind of offence because the child was exposed to it publically without understanding what its looking at?

I'm sick of all of it. Beefing in public isn't about feeding or nutrition. It's about attention whoring. Having sex in public is the same thing. Both deliver some kind of thrill to the perpetrator but no one else wants to see it.

We live in a civilization and I'm fucking tired of people who are attempting to drag us back to a hunter/gatherer society. I'm with Blondie--we need to move past the idea that we're animals. If you want to behave like a beast, go live in the jungle. Titfeed and fuck in the middle of the rainforest. But you can't do it in polite society.

And I don't write this because I'm prudish. I'm fine with strip clubs, even swingers clubs like the former Plato's Retreat. But keep it out of the public eye.

I don't want to see that shit, either. Even though I'm a phone ho, talk is one thing, actually seeing it is another. If I were to see something like that, I would feel embarrassed and it would probably ruin my outing. Beefing and sexual intercourse should be done in private. Not on a public beach where anyone can walk by and see you.

Yes but you know "they" have decided only one of those things is perverted. Hell I'd rather see people having sex than sit next to a loaf sucking on a veiny pendulous tit, given a choice. I would be fine comparing the two, though. Manipulating body parts to release fluids. Other than nose blowing into a tissue, not cool in public. I hate public spitting too.

Quote
evilchildlessbitch

Quote
ladybug2203
If moo isnt getting any no one is

No. People have the right to avail themselves of public areas without getting an unwanted live porn display whether they are an adult or a kid or a senior citizen. My tax dollars help pay the beach I have every right to use without having to avoid two morons who want to hump and pump but are too lazy to go home or too cheap to get a room or go to a private beach at, for example, a swinger's club where this behavior is perfectly fine.

There is no such thing as "private" public property. Part of going out in public is following the rules of where you live. While I would prefer people BF in private, at least a modest and respectful person can shove an infant up under their shirt. Nobody can screw without letting their genitals be exposed. Whether I'm "getting any" or not I expect to be able to use a public beach without seeing two people screwing. It is public space and that is an activity to be done in private or on private property whether kids are present or not. It's not my job to fund people's public fuck pads.

Relax I was joking, just trying to lighten up the situation

Quote
blondie

Quote
mumofsixbirds

Quote
StudioFiftyFour

Quote
exile
So what happens if a brat sees a loaf breastfeeding in public but was bottle raised, dose it make it indecent exposure or some kind of offence because the child was exposed to it publically without understanding what its looking at?

I'm sick of all of it. Beefing in public isn't about feeding or nutrition. It's about attention whoring. Having sex in public is the same thing. Both deliver some kind of thrill to the perpetrator but no one else wants to see it.

We live in a civilization and I'm fucking tired of people who are attempting to drag us back to a hunter/gatherer society. I'm with Blondie--we need to move past the idea that we're animals. If you want to behave like a beast, go live in the jungle. Titfeed and fuck in the middle of the rainforest. But you can't do it in polite society.

And I don't write this because I'm prudish. I'm fine with strip clubs, even swingers clubs like the former Plato's Retreat. But keep it out of the public eye.

I don't want to see that shit, either. Even though I'm a phone ho, talk is one thing, actually seeing it is another. If I were to see something like that, I would feel embarrassed and it would probably ruin my outing. Beefing and sexual intercourse should be done in private. Not on a public beach where anyone can walk by and see you.

Yes but you know "they" have decided only one of those things is perverted. Hell I'd rather see people having sex than sit next to a loaf sucking on a veiny pendulous tit, given a choice. I would be fine comparing the two, though. Manipulating body parts to release fluids. Other than nose blowing into a tissue, not cool in public. I hate public spitting too.

same, i'd rather see public sex than public beefing any day, I was watching youtube in the privacy of my own home a few days ago, and every add for 2 hours was this add about breast feeding showing a close up of its sicking tit sucking, I had to click off the shows I was watching, I was eating lunch and was put off it by the second time I had to see it, I don't want to see that shit, not in public, not in my home, not at all, not to mention all the diaper adds with a clearly Satan toddler bouncing around voiced over with "when your toddler is ready" as if its a given that every person watching that add has or will have a baby.

i'd rather *nice babyless* tits/vag/dick/ass shoved in my face any day, any time over that, maybe even sweaty ones.

Exile,

It's not about what you want to see, nor is it about what I want to see.

We're living in a civilization. We're not animals, not hunter-gatherers, not cavemen. When beefing OR graphic sex invades public spaces, it represents a human devolution back to more primitive times. We need to move forward.

Let me restate that I am all in favor of legalized pornography, prostitution, and swingers clubs. All are fine. What's not fine is having to be exposed to sex in the public arena. Same goes for beefing.

I'm tired of what amounts to a minority of stupid, yet increasingly vocal and crass, cadre of human beings who are determined to pound our culture and civilization down a rat hole. Well they're not going to do so. At least not without a fight.

Public beefing, public fucking, or any private act that an individual forces upon the public is unacceptable. This isn't "Idiocracy" goddammit.

StudioFiftyFour

My opinion is my opinion, you have a different one, that's great but dosn't mean I agree or will sit here and argue with you about it, regardless of the topic of public displays of graphic material for a minute, I do believe this is Idiocracy beginning because there are simply too many idiots out there for it not to have begun.

If it wasn't, we wouldn't be discussing topics about stupid people regularly, regardless of if the people being debated have kids in tow or not.

I won't be further responding on this topic since I see no gain in entering into an argument.

You have the right to your opinion. Let me emphasize--It's not an argument--it's a discussion on whether allowing people to behave like wild savages in public space moves the project of civilization forward, or backward.

Quote
exile

same, i'd rather see public sex than public beefing any day, I was watching youtube in the privacy of my own home a few days ago, and every add for 2 hours was this add about breast feeding showing a close up of its sicking tit sucking, I had to click off the shows I was watching, I was eating lunch and was put off it by the second time I had to see it, I don't want to see that shit, not in public, not in my home, not at all, not to mention all the diaper adds with a clearly Satan toddler bouncing around voiced over with "when your toddler is ready" as if its a given that every person watching that add has or will have a baby.

i'd rather *nice babyless* tits/vag/dick/ass shoved in my face any day, any time over that, maybe even sweaty ones.

LOL!

If you want to avoid ads all together, get Firefox and Ad Block Edge 2191

+++++++++++++

Passive Aggressive
Master Of Anti-brat
Excuses!

Quote
StudioFiftyFour
You have the right to your opinion. Let me emphasize--It's not an argument--it's a discussion on whether allowing people to behave like wild savages in public space moves the project of civilization forward, or backward.

So much this! It isn't about being a prude, or protecting kids or anything else. It is about the fact that everyone should be able to use publicly funded spaces without being subjected to unwanted porn. I don't like it but beefing in public is legal. Fucking is not. I don't want to see any of it in public. That is what porn is for, and should be watched in private. We are not animals and from one of the articles I read they were well aware others could see them. Anybody of any age shouldn't have to leave a public place because two adults can't or won't go home to fuck.

People should not have sex on the beach, and there should be a penalty for it because others have the right not to have to see people having sex. However, registration as a sex offender because one of the people who saw it happened to be a child is ridiculous. The registry probably implies that he was deliberately exposing himself to the kid, whereas it's more likely that seeing a kid completely spoiled the moment - it sure would for me. Some of this punishment is valid and some is pure hysteria.

Several things bother me about this story, and they bother me more than the fact that people had sex in public, which I agree should be illegal. Mostly it's the outrage because a chyuld was present, and that this makes the crime somehow much worse.

I'm going with the linked story information and linked video here. There may be more evidence that I'm not aware of, but I'm not interested enough to research it further.

I just don't view this particular case as sexual assault upon a minor, and despite any and all expert opinions from legal, medical, and chyuld psychology experts who will vehemently disagree and present mountains of evidence, this is still my opinion. Those of you who strongly disagree with my view are totally entitled to your opinion, as am I, so I just wanted to state my opinion, too.

The video was not at that much of a close range, and shows no chyuldrun within the frame. Even if parts of the video weren't blocked out, the video shows the couple was not in close enough range for me to have been able to discern much in details had I been present, so I doubt the four year old on the beach could see much better than I could. I also wonder how much a 4 year old can even comprehend of this act, how the four year old can see better than I could, and why the 4 year old's handlers didn't immediately remove him or her from viewing this.

The "outraged" grandmoo in the linked video said the whole group of offended holy famblees on the beach watched this spectacle yet did nothing during the entire first fucking session. How about turning your kyds away so they won't see, and going to another area of the beach, and calling the police immediately? But they didn't call the police.

According to outraged and offended grandmoo, the famblees instead waited, and watched, and didn't relocate to another section of the beach, all while the couple carried on. They waited and watched when the couple next went into the water, and waited and watched while the couple then came back onto the beach and passed out. Grandmoo said the couple then passed out for a long time and all the viewing famblees even wondered if the couple was dead. Still no call to police. Then the couple started up again, and then finally one of the offended famblees asked them to stop and at that point, someone at last called police.

Along with the notion that a crime is worse if chyuldrun are present is the idea that just because chyuldrun were present, this is a good enough reason to label these people as sex offenders for life. The couple showed disregard for anyone present, true, however, in my opinion, I see no evidence that they targeted any chyuldrun, engaged with any chyuldrun, or had sex within close range of chyuldrun. They're being stigmatised the same as people who deliberately expose themselves to just chyuldrun or engage in direct sexual acts with minors.

There is also societal hypocrisy here. Sex in public is wrong, but exposed breasts, if one is a beefing moo, is protected status. In my opinion, naked, exposed breasts, especially when showing nipple, should also be considered indecent exposure. After all, moos beef in public all the time in full view of nearby chyuldrun who get as much or much more of a close-up view of the full naked boob, including nipple, than they got of this couple's private parts, but no, public nudity associated with beefing (providing necessary nutrishun for a hungwy chyuwld!!) is not lewd and lascivious but instead a sanctified and protected act.

Imagine what kids see in the "family bed." Makes you wonder how many "precious" young minds have been warped from what they witness on a daily basis at home.

Quote
night owl
I just don't view this particular case as sexual assault upon a minor, and despite any and all expert opinions from legal, medical, and chyuld psychology experts who will vehemently disagree and present mountains of evidence, this is still my opinion. Those of you who strongly disagree with my view are totally entitled to your opinion, as am I, so I just wanted to state my opinion, too.

I and I imagine a good many other people in the world, accidently saw my parents have sex when I was a child. I was uncomfortable with it because who wants to see that? - but it didn't scar me for life. Besides, I'd already seen plenty of animals have sex by then; even if we hadn't had livestock I'm sure I would have seen dogs going at it at some point.

Back in the days when an entire family might live in a one room cabin or hovel people didn't have just one kid, so I'm pretty sure kids can adapt to having seen sex. For them it's just gross or uninteresting. It's hand-wringing adults that get so worried about sex (someone might have seen, how many people did someone sleep with, etc).

Of course people shouldn't have to see it in a public place, but this is indecent exposure or the like, not a sex crime and not pedophilia.