Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 894 |
Quote
Why bosses are right to distrust women who don't want children... by a VERY outspoken mother (and ex-boss)
Much as I like to trumpet the importance of a woman's right to choose all things at all times, there's one choice I simply cannot understand: the choice of an otherwise sane and healthy woman not to have children.
If a would-be mother is a singleton of 40 who decides to have a baby without a partner, I might wish she'd thought of it sooner and prepared for it better - but I understand.
If she's half of a lesbian couple who 'borrows' the wherewithal, I might cross my fingers that the child is not teased at school - but I understand. Even if she's a 66-year- old pregnant pensioner, threatening to turn motherhood into a freak show, I might (indeed, I do) think she's monstrously selfish and dangerously wrong - but again, more or less, I understand.
Yet if she says she hasn't a shred of maternal feeling in her, moreover, if she says she would prefer to concentrate on her career and that a child would only get in the way of it, then my head might acknowledge her right to do so. But my heart whispers: 'Lady, you're weird.'
It was welcome news, therefore, to discover this week that I am not alone. Research conducted over six years shows that far from bosses and colleagues always being suspicious of a working mother, the opposite is becoming true: it is the childless woman who is regarded as cold and odd.
As a result, it is these single-track careerists who are increasingly likely to be vilified, refused jobs and denied promotion because many employers believe them to lack what the study calls 'an essential humanity'. And I know exactly what they mean.
In the little hothouse of my own trade as a hack, I play a game with myself. Reading all the other female scribblers, sometimes with grudging admiration and sometimes none at all, I try to guess from their expression of their world view whether or not they are mothers.
I haven't - yet - been wrong. Now, with MPs so much in the headlines, I've extended the game and started to guess about the women among them, too.
As far as I can tell, my score is also pretty high there - even though it's just a feeling. On both sides of the political divide, as with the writers, it's not what MPs say or do, so much as how they go about it.
'Mothers bring something extra'
And if that touch of 'essential humanity' - or its absence - colours such notably tough professions, it's hardly surprising that employers are starting to notice that the same applies across the spectrum of workplaces.
Of course, we need not be silly about it.
Nobody wishes to see a female soldier in combat with a six-week-old infant in one arm and a rifle in the other.
Or a high-flier working 20-hour days while still breast-feeding. Or the mother of a small brood taking on any job of such erratic hours that she cannot promise them when or even if she'll be home.
But most jobs aren't like that - and most children don't stay babies for long.
Besides which, in my experiences both as a colleague and an employer, I have found that mothers almost always bring something extra to the job, to the benefit of all.
It's not the mothers, for a start, who are going to turn up late and hungover after a night on the razz; they'll have been up, dressed and alert for hours, having cooked a family breakfast and delivered their children to school. On time.
It's not the mothers, usually, who run the office bitch-fest.
They're not there to compete for the attentions of the male executives; they're there to get out of the house; they're there because they genuinely enjoy some adult company; and they're there because they have mouths to feed other than their own and shoes to buy for someone else's feet.
Two-thirds of working mothers, a recent survey found, could not provide for the children they love in the manner they would wish if they lost their jobs. So there's incentive for you.
They will, it is true, snatch time off for poorly children and Christmas carol services. And it's true they will insist that, in return for arriving on the dot of 9am, they must also leave on the dot of 5pm.
Valuing assets in your staff
But rarely have I encountered a mother who did not offer to make up time lost, often in lunch hours. As for leaving on time, put enough mothers together in one workplace and you'll get rid of the ghastly ethos of 'presenteeism', whereby people vie for plaudits based solely on how late - albeit often uselessly - they hang around the office.
The prioritising that may baffle other people is a cinch for a woman who has spent years juggling a household. Negotiating skills? A request for 10 per cent off an overdue invoice is nothing to a woman who has had to broker a deal on Britain's Got Talent versus bedtime.
When it comes to emergencies, if you have run all the way to a clinic with a terrified toddler vomiting down your neck then, trust me, a package delayed in transit is a piece of cake. And if those are the tangibles, the intangibles - the 'essential humanity' - are more important still.
You cannot be a mother without knowing something about selflessness, compassion, generosity, commitment, fierce loyalty and plain hard work. You cannot - surely - be a boss and not value assets such as those in your staff.
Nor is it the boss who pays the price for the extras a mother brings with her; she's the one who pays for that.
Enough reams have been written about the long hours of slog it takes to run a home and hold down a job at the same time. Yet still we keep doing it because we want our work, our independence and our money.
But, more than all the things we want, we actually need our children; they complete us as women, they are our light and our love and our legacy.
We feel desperately sorry for those who yearn for children they cannot have; the unwilling barren, if you will. But when we meet a woman who chooses her childlessness in the belief that there is something out there worth more, we smile politely even while - once again - our guts whisper: 'Lady, you're weird.'
So three cheers for the employers who are catching on, the ones who don't want to people their workforces with the cold, the calculating, the sad and the mad. The only question is: what took you so long?
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,035 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 5,443 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,291 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 168 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,835 |
Miss_Hannigan NLI
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 883 |
Quote
But, more than all the things we want, we actually need our children; they complete us as women, they are our light and our love and our legacy.
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 14, 2010 | Registered: 18 years ago Posts: 4,092 |
Quote
Breeder Cunt
As a result, it is these single-track careerists who are increasingly likely to be vilified, refused jobs and denied promotion
Quote
I have found that mothers almost always bring something extra to the job
Quote
It's not the mothers, usually, who run the office bitch-fest.
Quote
they're there because they have mouths to feed other than their own and shoes to buy for someone else's feet.
Quote
put enough mothers together in one workplace and you'll get rid of the ghastly ethos of 'presenteeism', whereby people vie for plaudits based solely on how late - albeit often uselessly - they hang around the office.
Anonymous User
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 12,447 |
Quote
kidsuck
I had a job at a vet clinic where the entire staff was comprised of CF women. The boss loved it cause she never lost anyone for months on end to mat leave, had to deal with lateness or days off due to brat nonsense. She gave me a week off when I had my tubal!larious
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 1,431 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 405 |
As she puts it, she is a "hack" (aww bless, she's got herself a little writing job).Quote
When it comes to emergencies, if you have run all the way to a clinic with a terrified toddler vomiting down your neck then, trust me, a package delayed in transit is a piece of cake
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,434 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,149 |
Quote
Miss_Hannigan NLI
I can pick out the mothers in my workplace by their shoddy clothes (gym shoes in a corporate office), greasy ponytails, asses that look like the Sears Tower fell down sideways, a candy buffet larger than their outbox, and the ubiquitous 2-liter insulated mug from 7-11.
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 254 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 7,027 |
Quote
mumofsixbirds
She talks about how being a mother makes a person more compassionate, but this article PROVES that isn't the case?? Downgrading her fellow sisters because they don't have kids.
Quote
blather
You cannot be a mother without knowing something about selflessness, compassion, generosity, commitment, fierce loyalty and plain hard work. You cannot - surely - be a boss and not value assets such as those in your staff.
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 12,434 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,149 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,603 |
Quote
yurble
I always wondered why CF people are often characterized as party animals when we are disproportionately introverts. I suspect that a good many breeders once swilled beer like it was going out of style, and staggered into work hung over during their early 20s. Do they assume that's what we do with our childfree lives because that's what they want to be doing, or because they lack the imagination to envision anything outside of their own experience?
My childfree adult years are like nothing they might have experienced before they had children, my early 20s were quite different from their pre-child years, and even as a child I was different from my peers. Breeders cannot understand me because they have never experienced what I have experienced, and lack the ability to even envision my life in even an abstract way, let alone in an empathetic manner. (An ability to display empathy for, and understand the position of someone who isn't 'like you' is, in my opinion, one of the differences between parents and breeders.)
Miss_Hannigna NLI
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 |
Quote
yurble
I always wondered why CF people are often characterized as party animals when we are disproportionately introverts.
Quote
yurble
I suspect that a good many breeders once swilled beer like it was going out of style, and staggered into work hung over during their early 20s. Do they assume that's what we do with our childfree lives because that's what they want to be doing, or because they lack the imagination to envision anything outside of their own experience?
Again, exactly this. "If only I didn't have this squalling burden, I could go back to whoring it up at Slappy's Tavern"
Anonymous User
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 1,979 |
Re: Carol believes she can always pick which female staff have children December 15, 2010 | Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 183 |
Quote
CrabCake
All this reminds of a great post on this board a few months ago. I think it was by Amethyst. It hit the nail on the head regarding moo hypocrisy and the whole "parenting makes you less selfish" when it actually makes them far MORE selfish. I've looked for the post but can't find it. Amethyst, was that you, and if so do you have it or know where it is?
Quote
Amethyst
"Because I think when you are actively involved in raising children, it shows you know how to sacrifice yourself for the well being of others," she said.... This quote, by a single mother (aka Big Fail).
larious
OTHERS?! Raising children is patently NOT about "sacrificing yourself for others". It's about spending all your time and resources on different versions of YOU. Because YOU cant get enough of YOU. And so you think the world is not complete unless it has several different versions of YOU to share around.
Parenting is the number one biggest excuse in the world not to raise a finger to help anyone, in any way, at all, your whole life. Parents are not very likely to help others outside of their own family -- they just don't. They think that buying lots of christmas gifts for their toddler is somehow equivalent to real giving -- meaning dropping £50 into the charity bucket for the homeless shelter or volunteering for meals on wheels runs. Come Halloween, each and every one of 'em makes sure their child receives back at least as much candy as is given out by them on the day -- because hey, they don't want to be ripped off, right? Yeah, they'll fund-raise... for their child's school trip. Yeah, they'll bake cakes... for their child's scout troop. Yeah, they'll take a handful of underpriviledged inner city kids camping overnight in the country... so long as their children get to go too.
And so elections. Voting parents into public office is exactly the same thing as hiring them in the workplace, in my opinion: they're a liability. Like damaged goods. Their liability is off the scale when they're new parents, and it decreases over time but never quite disappears. I won't bother expatiating the reasons why they stink as employees (there are so many whole threads dedicated to that). Suffice to say that they know their get-out clauses and they're not afraid to use them when the going gets tough. And 20 years experience of living a narrow, myopic, cloistered existence where the only 'tabled' meetings are over the changing table and the kitchen table is NOT adequate real-world training for people who need to make broad-minded and tough leadership decisions.
Oh, AND be called to account -- by other adults -- over those decisions. Not only is that a completely alien concept to parents, but something to which they are actually hostile. However it is they treated their own children when their authority was questioned is exactly the same response the colleagues and voters will get. One more word from Mr Treasury and he's going to have to spend the next hour of debate sitting on the naughty step.