Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status April 14, 2022 | Registered: 17 years ago Posts: 8,579 |
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status April 14, 2022 | Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 2,560 |
Quote
bell_flower
I suppose by now we've all seen the hype over 41 year old Brittany Spears' pregnasty with her 27 year old boyfriend.
Of course, it's so WOOOOONDERFUL that she can have a baybee. It's harder to find that she lost custody of her first two kids.
My general impression is a big shrug. Yes, it was wrong for her family to raid her money and control her body. It gets into the whole "mah right to have a baybee" argument.
Yes, she has enough money to support the kid, for now, but I also wonder how many baby daddies and kids she would have had, had it not been for the conservatorship. At one time she certainly had bad judgement, mental health problems, etc.
So generally I do agree it's wrong to have someone else control your body. But I do shake my head how the OutrageTM only extends to having a baybee.
Random people are up in arms when someone isn't allowed to have a baybee, but there's no OutrageTM when a CF person isn't extended the same rights with his/her body?
Just ask any CF person who has tried to get a tubal ligation or a vasectomy.
P.S. I haven't seen the Hulu documentary. If anyone wants to weigh in on that, I'm all ears.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status April 25, 2022 | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 3,020 |
Quote
Peace
I saw Brittany's picture and the first thing that came to my mind is that she looks old, used and ridden hard. The sperm donor is 27? He's after a payday with her and the best way is to sue for custody and get child support from her.
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status May 13, 2022 | Registered: 17 years ago Posts: 8,579 |
Re: Our Breederific Media and Reproductive Status May 15, 2022 | Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 3,020 |
Quote
Peace
Quote
bell_flower
I suppose by now we've all seen the hype over 41 year old Brittany Spears' pregnasty with her 27 year old boyfriend.
Of course, it's so WOOOOONDERFUL that she can have a baybee. It's harder to find that she lost custody of her first two kids.
My general impression is a big shrug. Yes, it was wrong for her family to raid her money and control her body. It gets into the whole "mah right to have a baybee" argument.
Yes, she has enough money to support the kid, for now, but I also wonder how many baby daddies and kids she would have had, had it not been for the conservatorship. At one time she certainly had bad judgement, mental health problems, etc.
So generally I do agree it's wrong to have someone else control your body. But I do shake my head how the OutrageTM only extends to having a baybee.
Random people are up in arms when someone isn't allowed to have a baybee, but there's no OutrageTM when a CF person isn't extended the same rights with his/her body?
Just ask any CF person who has tried to get a tubal ligation or a vasectomy.
P.S. I haven't seen the Hulu documentary. If anyone wants to weigh in on that, I'm all ears.
I saw Brittany's picture and the first thing that came to my mind is that she looks old, used and ridden hard. The sperm donor is 27? He's after a payday with her and the best way is to sue for custody and get child support from her.